Subjective Measures of Workload and Sleep in Australian Army Recruits; Potential Utility as Monitoring Tools

ABSTRACT Introduction Subjective measures may offer practitioners a relatively simple method to monitor recruit responses to basic military training (BMT). Yet, a lack of agreement between subjective and objective measures may presents a problem to practitioners wishing to implement subjective monit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Military medicine 2023-03, Vol.188 (3-4), p.670-677
Main Authors: Gibson, Neil, Drain, Jace R, Larsen, Penelope, Williams, Sean, Groeller, Herbert, Sampson, John A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Australia
Heart Rate
Humans
Physical Exertion - physiology
Sleep - physiology
Sleep Duration
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workload
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction Subjective measures may offer practitioners a relatively simple method to monitor recruit responses to basic military training (BMT). Yet, a lack of agreement between subjective and objective measures may presents a problem to practitioners wishing to implement subjective monitoring strategies. This study therefore aims to examine associations between subjective and objective measures of workload and sleep in Australian Army recruits. Materials and Methods Thirty recruits provided daily rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and differential RPE (d-RPE) for breathlessness and leg muscle exertion each evening. Daily internal workloads determined via heart rate monitors were expressed as Edwards training impulse (TRIMP) and average heart rate. External workloads were determined via global positioning system (PlayerLoadTM) and activity monitors (step count). Subjective sleep quality and duration was monitored in 29 different recruits via a customized questionnaire. Activity monitors assessed objective sleep measures. Linear mixed-models assessed associations between objective and subjective measures. Akaike Information Criterion assessed if the inclusion of d-RPE measures resulted in a more parsimonious model. Mean bias, typical error of the estimate (TEE) and within-subject repeated measures correlations examined agreement between subjective and objective sleep duration. Results Conditional R2 for associations between objective and subjective workloads ranged from 0.18 to 0.78, P 
ISSN:0026-4075
1930-613X
DOI:10.1093/milmed/usab551