In-vitro cytocompatibility of self-adhesive dual-curing resin cements on human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) and periodontal ligament cells (PDL-hTERT)

Self-adhesive dual cured resin cements provide easier clinical application than conventional resin cements but release higher amounts of unreacted monomers, potentially affecting their biocompatibility. This study aimed to compare the cytotoxic effects of self-adhesive dual cured resin cements with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dental materials 2022-02, Vol.38 (2), p.376-383
Main Authors: Frasheri, Iris, Grimm, Alexandra, Ern, Christina, Hickel, Reinhard, Folwaczny, Matthias
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adhesives
Biocompatibility
Cell viability
Cements
Cytotoxicity
Dental cement
Humans
Ligaments
Materials Testing
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Monomer
Monomers
Periodontal
Periodontal Ligament
Polymerization
Release
Resin Cements
Resins
Stem cells
Telomerase reverse transcriptase
Tissue
Toxicity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Self-adhesive dual cured resin cements provide easier clinical application than conventional resin cements but release higher amounts of unreacted monomers, potentially affecting their biocompatibility. This study aimed to compare the cytotoxic effects of self-adhesive dual cured resin cements with two conventional resin cements. Samples of four resin cements, two self-adhesive dual cured cements (group A: RelyX Unicem, group B: SmartCem), and two conventional resin cements (group C: Panavia 2.0, group D: Variolink Esthetic DC) were prepared with a similar dimension under standardized polymerization conditions and stored in water. For each material 18 samples were used and cell cultures of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) or periodontal ligament cells (PDL-hTERT) were added under appropriate conditions. One experimental group (group E) was left untreated as control. A cell viability WST test, was performed in each experimental group at day 1, 7, 14 and 21. Moreover, microscopic examination of cells was performed using cell viability staining. Viability of both cell types as determined by WST test was significantly impaired at all time periods by the four different cement materials compared to the untreated control. Comparison between the four materials revealed different inhibition of the viability of both, PDL-hTERT and hMSC cells (group C > group B > group A > group D; p 
ISSN:0109-5641
1879-0097
DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.020