Prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthetic restoration: A retrospective study after 17 to 23 years

Information on the epidemiology and etiopathology of peri-implant diseases in reference to prostheses is sparse. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze the prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthesis. A total of 274 implants in 106 patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2023-11, Vol.130 (5), p.690-697
Main Authors: Kesar, Nikolina, Weigl, Paul, Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus, Krebs, Mischa
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3
container_end_page 697
container_issue 5
container_start_page 690
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 130
creator Kesar, Nikolina
Weigl, Paul
Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus
Krebs, Mischa
description Information on the epidemiology and etiopathology of peri-implant diseases in reference to prostheses is sparse. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze the prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthesis. A total of 274 implants in 106 patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological examination. Peri-implant mucositis was defined by bleeding on probing, whereas peri-implantitis was defined by additional bone loss ≥1.5 mm since seating of the definitive prosthesis. Prosthetic design and anamnestic risk factors were assessed in a regression analysis, whereas clinical and radiological differences between the prosthesis groups were compared by the Pearson chi-squared test (α=.05 for all procedures). The median observation period was 18 years. Seventy-two implants were restored with single crowns, 138 implants with fixed partial dentures, and 64 implants with removable prostheses. Peri-implant mucositis was diagnosed more often in implants supporting fixed partial dentures (42.8%), whereas peri-implantitis was found more frequently in implants supporting removable prostheses (31.3%) (overall distribution pattern: P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619210380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619210380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9Uctu3DAMFIoUzSbtLwQ89mKHlGzL7i0I0gcQoDm0Z0GWaFSbXduRtAH2ng-v0iS9kCA4JGc4QlwQ1oTUXW7rNS7J85xriZJqohoVvhMbwkFXXd_QidggSlmpgdSpOEtpi4h9q-mDOFVt2aGHZiOe7iI_2h3PjsHOHmJI97BMsHIMVdivOztn8CGxTZxgLNHDMkP-w5CPK_-DFiKlzsFB5JSXaHNY5i9wVcpceiu7HB4ZUj74I9gpcwTSkBeQCo5sY_oo3k92l_jTaz4Xv7_e_Lr-Xt3-_Pbj-uq2cqodckVSaeRRT9ig8tyPHhvVtuPQ90orN-LkiNmi7jqv2VFHshl4bLUbLE3eqnPx-WVvofxwKFzNPiTHuyKSl0MysqNBEqoeC7R7gbqiIEWezBrD3sajITTPDpiteXPAPDtgiExxoAxevN44jHv2_8feXq7-Al7ShnE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619210380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthetic restoration: A retrospective study after 17 to 23 years</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kesar, Nikolina ; Weigl, Paul ; Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus ; Krebs, Mischa</creator><creatorcontrib>Kesar, Nikolina ; Weigl, Paul ; Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus ; Krebs, Mischa</creatorcontrib><description>Information on the epidemiology and etiopathology of peri-implant diseases in reference to prostheses is sparse. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze the prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthesis. A total of 274 implants in 106 patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological examination. Peri-implant mucositis was defined by bleeding on probing, whereas peri-implantitis was defined by additional bone loss ≥1.5 mm since seating of the definitive prosthesis. Prosthetic design and anamnestic risk factors were assessed in a regression analysis, whereas clinical and radiological differences between the prosthesis groups were compared by the Pearson chi-squared test (α=.05 for all procedures). The median observation period was 18 years. Seventy-two implants were restored with single crowns, 138 implants with fixed partial dentures, and 64 implants with removable prostheses. Peri-implant mucositis was diagnosed more often in implants supporting fixed partial dentures (42.8%), whereas peri-implantitis was found more frequently in implants supporting removable prostheses (31.3%) (overall distribution pattern: P&lt;.001). The type of prosthetic restoration was confirmed to be an independent prognostic risk factor regarding peri-implant diseases (P=.005). Additionally, increased bone loss was found with implant-supported removable prostheses, regardless of peri-implantitis (P&lt;.001). The type of prosthetic restoration was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of peri-implant diseases. Particularly, implants supporting double crown-retained removable prostheses might be at risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35016794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2023-11, Vol.130 (5), p.690-697</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6163-6764</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kesar, Nikolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigl, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Mischa</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthetic restoration: A retrospective study after 17 to 23 years</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Information on the epidemiology and etiopathology of peri-implant diseases in reference to prostheses is sparse. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze the prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthesis. A total of 274 implants in 106 patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological examination. Peri-implant mucositis was defined by bleeding on probing, whereas peri-implantitis was defined by additional bone loss ≥1.5 mm since seating of the definitive prosthesis. Prosthetic design and anamnestic risk factors were assessed in a regression analysis, whereas clinical and radiological differences between the prosthesis groups were compared by the Pearson chi-squared test (α=.05 for all procedures). The median observation period was 18 years. Seventy-two implants were restored with single crowns, 138 implants with fixed partial dentures, and 64 implants with removable prostheses. Peri-implant mucositis was diagnosed more often in implants supporting fixed partial dentures (42.8%), whereas peri-implantitis was found more frequently in implants supporting removable prostheses (31.3%) (overall distribution pattern: P&lt;.001). The type of prosthetic restoration was confirmed to be an independent prognostic risk factor regarding peri-implant diseases (P=.005). Additionally, increased bone loss was found with implant-supported removable prostheses, regardless of peri-implantitis (P&lt;.001). The type of prosthetic restoration was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of peri-implant diseases. Particularly, implants supporting double crown-retained removable prostheses might be at risk.</description><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9Uctu3DAMFIoUzSbtLwQ89mKHlGzL7i0I0gcQoDm0Z0GWaFSbXduRtAH2ng-v0iS9kCA4JGc4QlwQ1oTUXW7rNS7J85xriZJqohoVvhMbwkFXXd_QidggSlmpgdSpOEtpi4h9q-mDOFVt2aGHZiOe7iI_2h3PjsHOHmJI97BMsHIMVdivOztn8CGxTZxgLNHDMkP-w5CPK_-DFiKlzsFB5JSXaHNY5i9wVcpceiu7HB4ZUj74I9gpcwTSkBeQCo5sY_oo3k92l_jTaz4Xv7_e_Lr-Xt3-_Pbj-uq2cqodckVSaeRRT9ig8tyPHhvVtuPQ90orN-LkiNmi7jqv2VFHshl4bLUbLE3eqnPx-WVvofxwKFzNPiTHuyKSl0MysqNBEqoeC7R7gbqiIEWezBrD3sajITTPDpiteXPAPDtgiExxoAxevN44jHv2_8feXq7-Al7ShnE</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Kesar, Nikolina</creator><creator>Weigl, Paul</creator><creator>Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus</creator><creator>Krebs, Mischa</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-6764</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthetic restoration: A retrospective study after 17 to 23 years</title><author>Kesar, Nikolina ; Weigl, Paul ; Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus ; Krebs, Mischa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kesar, Nikolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigl, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Mischa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kesar, Nikolina</au><au>Weigl, Paul</au><au>Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus</au><au>Krebs, Mischa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthetic restoration: A retrospective study after 17 to 23 years</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>697</epage><pages>690-697</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Information on the epidemiology and etiopathology of peri-implant diseases in reference to prostheses is sparse. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze the prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthesis. A total of 274 implants in 106 patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological examination. Peri-implant mucositis was defined by bleeding on probing, whereas peri-implantitis was defined by additional bone loss ≥1.5 mm since seating of the definitive prosthesis. Prosthetic design and anamnestic risk factors were assessed in a regression analysis, whereas clinical and radiological differences between the prosthesis groups were compared by the Pearson chi-squared test (α=.05 for all procedures). The median observation period was 18 years. Seventy-two implants were restored with single crowns, 138 implants with fixed partial dentures, and 64 implants with removable prostheses. Peri-implant mucositis was diagnosed more often in implants supporting fixed partial dentures (42.8%), whereas peri-implantitis was found more frequently in implants supporting removable prostheses (31.3%) (overall distribution pattern: P&lt;.001). The type of prosthetic restoration was confirmed to be an independent prognostic risk factor regarding peri-implant diseases (P=.005). Additionally, increased bone loss was found with implant-supported removable prostheses, regardless of peri-implantitis (P&lt;.001). The type of prosthetic restoration was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of peri-implant diseases. Particularly, implants supporting double crown-retained removable prostheses might be at risk.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35016794</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.030</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-6764</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2023-11, Vol.130 (5), p.690-697
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619210380
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
title Prevalence and risk of peri-implant diseases based on the type of prosthetic restoration: A retrospective study after 17 to 23 years
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20risk%20of%20peri-implant%20diseases%20based%20on%20the%20type%20of%20prosthetic%20restoration:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20after%2017%20to%2023%20years&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Kesar,%20Nikolina&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=697&rft.pages=690-697&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2619210380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-12370eb7f0403de8bd04355b988373cb0fc1eea0766d7ec161249eb57c9a1fda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619210380&rft_id=info:pmid/35016794&rfr_iscdi=true