Loading…
Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials
To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dentistry 2022-03, Vol.118, p.103949-103949, Article 103949 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943 |
container_end_page | 103949 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103949 |
container_title | Journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Leyva del Rio, Diana Johnston, William Michael |
description | To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.
Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction.
The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P < 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT.
Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2620083828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571222000069</els_id><sourcerecordid>2646135858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMoOi6_QJAGL156rKzTffAg4gaCFwVvIZ1UY5rpxaRH9N-bsUcPHrzkkcr3qiqPkGMKcwpUnTfzxmE3zhkwliq8FOUWmdFiUeZ0oV62yQw4QC4XlO2R_RgbABDAyl2yxyUwxaWYkbvHYfTWLDP7aoKxIwYfUyFmfZ3hx5CubZqR3t0ktm-HPvoRs4DRd1lr1hazjIdkp06CRxs9IM83109Xd_nD4-391eVDboXkY15x6Zxw3KAqkDlWs0IatNKCoxXCwnBlKyWYK6mQ6SyZoorWVSXrElwp-AE5m_oOoX9bYRx166PF5dJ02K-iZooBFLxgRUJP_6BNvwpd2i5RQlEuC7mm-ETZ0McYsNZD-rQJn5qCXgetG_0dtF4Hraegk-tk03tVteh-PT_JJuBiAjCF8e4x6Gg9dhadD2hH7Xr_74Avv52P0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646135858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Leyva del Rio, Diana ; Johnston, William Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Leyva del Rio, Diana ; Johnston, William Michael</creatorcontrib><description>To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.
Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction.
The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P < 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT.
Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35026354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Aluminum ; Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate ; Color ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins ; Dental cement ; Dental Materials ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Experimental composites ; Filler fraction ; Fillers ; Humans ; Light ; Light transmission ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Monomers ; Optical characteristics ; Optical properties ; Parameters ; Particle size ; Polymerization ; Resins ; Statistical analysis ; Thickness ; Translucency ; Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2022-03, Vol.118, p.103949-103949, Article 103949</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35026354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leyva del Rio, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.
Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction.
The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P < 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT.
Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental cement</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Experimental composites</subject><subject>Filler fraction</subject><subject>Fillers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light transmission</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Monomers</subject><subject>Optical characteristics</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Translucency</subject><subject>Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMoOi6_QJAGL156rKzTffAg4gaCFwVvIZ1UY5rpxaRH9N-bsUcPHrzkkcr3qiqPkGMKcwpUnTfzxmE3zhkwliq8FOUWmdFiUeZ0oV62yQw4QC4XlO2R_RgbABDAyl2yxyUwxaWYkbvHYfTWLDP7aoKxIwYfUyFmfZ3hx5CubZqR3t0ktm-HPvoRs4DRd1lr1hazjIdkp06CRxs9IM83109Xd_nD4-391eVDboXkY15x6Zxw3KAqkDlWs0IatNKCoxXCwnBlKyWYK6mQ6SyZoorWVSXrElwp-AE5m_oOoX9bYRx166PF5dJ02K-iZooBFLxgRUJP_6BNvwpd2i5RQlEuC7mm-ETZ0McYsNZD-rQJn5qCXgetG_0dtF4Hraegk-tk03tVteh-PT_JJuBiAjCF8e4x6Gg9dhadD2hH7Xr_74Avv52P0w</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Leyva del Rio, Diana</creator><creator>Johnston, William Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</title><author>Leyva del Rio, Diana ; Johnston, William Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental cement</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Experimental composites</topic><topic>Filler fraction</topic><topic>Fillers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light transmission</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Monomers</topic><topic>Optical characteristics</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Translucency</topic><topic>Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leyva del Rio, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leyva del Rio, Diana</au><au>Johnston, William Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>103949</spage><epage>103949</epage><pages>103949-103949</pages><artnum>103949</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.
Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction.
The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P < 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT.
Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35026354</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 2022-03, Vol.118, p.103949-103949, Article 103949 |
issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2620083828 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Acceptability Aluminum Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate Color Composite materials Composite Resins Dental cement Dental Materials Dental restorative materials Dentistry Experimental composites Filler fraction Fillers Humans Light Light transmission Materials Testing Mechanical properties Monomers Optical characteristics Optical properties Parameters Particle size Polymerization Resins Statistical analysis Thickness Translucency Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate Variance analysis |
title | Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A56%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optical%20characteristics%20of%20experimental%20dental%20composite%20resin%20materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Leyva%20del%20Rio,%20Diana&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=103949&rft.epage=103949&rft.pages=103949-103949&rft.artnum=103949&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646135858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646135858&rft_id=info:pmid/35026354&rfr_iscdi=true |