Loading…

Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials

To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dentistry 2022-03, Vol.118, p.103949-103949, Article 103949
Main Authors: Leyva del Rio, Diana, Johnston, William Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943
container_end_page 103949
container_issue
container_start_page 103949
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 118
creator Leyva del Rio, Diana
Johnston, William Michael
description To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction. The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P < 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT. Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2620083828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571222000069</els_id><sourcerecordid>2646135858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMoOi6_QJAGL156rKzTffAg4gaCFwVvIZ1UY5rpxaRH9N-bsUcPHrzkkcr3qiqPkGMKcwpUnTfzxmE3zhkwliq8FOUWmdFiUeZ0oV62yQw4QC4XlO2R_RgbABDAyl2yxyUwxaWYkbvHYfTWLDP7aoKxIwYfUyFmfZ3hx5CubZqR3t0ktm-HPvoRs4DRd1lr1hazjIdkp06CRxs9IM83109Xd_nD4-391eVDboXkY15x6Zxw3KAqkDlWs0IatNKCoxXCwnBlKyWYK6mQ6SyZoorWVSXrElwp-AE5m_oOoX9bYRx166PF5dJ02K-iZooBFLxgRUJP_6BNvwpd2i5RQlEuC7mm-ETZ0McYsNZD-rQJn5qCXgetG_0dtF4Hraegk-tk03tVteh-PT_JJuBiAjCF8e4x6Gg9dhadD2hH7Xr_74Avv52P0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646135858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Leyva del Rio, Diana ; Johnston, William Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Leyva del Rio, Diana ; Johnston, William Michael</creatorcontrib><description>To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction. The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P &lt; 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT. Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35026354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Aluminum ; Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate ; Color ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins ; Dental cement ; Dental Materials ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Experimental composites ; Filler fraction ; Fillers ; Humans ; Light ; Light transmission ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Monomers ; Optical characteristics ; Optical properties ; Parameters ; Particle size ; Polymerization ; Resins ; Statistical analysis ; Thickness ; Translucency ; Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2022-03, Vol.118, p.103949-103949, Article 103949</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35026354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leyva del Rio, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction. The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P &lt; 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT. Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental cement</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Experimental composites</subject><subject>Filler fraction</subject><subject>Fillers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light transmission</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Monomers</subject><subject>Optical characteristics</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Translucency</subject><subject>Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMoOi6_QJAGL156rKzTffAg4gaCFwVvIZ1UY5rpxaRH9N-bsUcPHrzkkcr3qiqPkGMKcwpUnTfzxmE3zhkwliq8FOUWmdFiUeZ0oV62yQw4QC4XlO2R_RgbABDAyl2yxyUwxaWYkbvHYfTWLDP7aoKxIwYfUyFmfZ3hx5CubZqR3t0ktm-HPvoRs4DRd1lr1hazjIdkp06CRxs9IM83109Xd_nD4-391eVDboXkY15x6Zxw3KAqkDlWs0IatNKCoxXCwnBlKyWYK6mQ6SyZoorWVSXrElwp-AE5m_oOoX9bYRx166PF5dJ02K-iZooBFLxgRUJP_6BNvwpd2i5RQlEuC7mm-ETZ0McYsNZD-rQJn5qCXgetG_0dtF4Hraegk-tk03tVteh-PT_JJuBiAjCF8e4x6Gg9dhadD2hH7Xr_74Avv52P0w</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Leyva del Rio, Diana</creator><creator>Johnston, William Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</title><author>Leyva del Rio, Diana ; Johnston, William Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental cement</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Experimental composites</topic><topic>Filler fraction</topic><topic>Fillers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light transmission</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Monomers</topic><topic>Optical characteristics</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Translucency</topic><topic>Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leyva del Rio, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leyva del Rio, Diana</au><au>Johnston, William Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>103949</spage><epage>103949</epage><pages>103949-103949</pages><artnum>103949</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>To derive the K-M optical coefficients of experimental composites and compare the inherent CIE L*, a* and b* color parameters, translucency parameters and both perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. Experimental composites were prepared with 4 base-monomers: Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA and Fit852 with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer and 3 filler:resin fractions (50:50wt%, 60:40wt% and 70:30wt%). The optical absorption (K) and scattering (S) coefficients over the visible spectra were derived. Corrected reflectivity spectra were calculated using the corrected Kubelka-Munk reflectance model and were used to calculate CIE color parameters (X, Y, Z) values. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using the CIEDE2000 color difference. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the CIE L*a* and b* color parameters at infinite thickness. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the translucency parameter at 2 mm thickness. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests. For all statistical testing α = 0.05 was used. Color parameters (ΔE00) were calculated for every experimental composite using the CIEDE2000 color differences. Perceptibility threshold (PT), acceptability threshold (AT) and translucency differences (ΔTP) were used to compare experimental composites in both filler fraction within every resin and every resin within each filler fraction. The statistical analysis revealed a 3-way interaction (P &lt; 0.0001) between base monomer, filler and direction factors. For the translucency parameter, when comparing filler fraction within base monomers, there were statistically significant differences between the filler fraction within all base monomers. The analysis of color differences (ΔE00) of base monomers within filler fraction revealed that the comparison between experimental composites where beyond the acceptability threshold. The comparison of the differences in translucency parameter (ΔTP) of base monomers within filler fraction were beyond the perceptibility threshold, except between base monomers UT and FT. Different base monomer and filler fraction combination influences the optical characteristics of experimental composites such as: light transmission, translucency, and color appearance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35026354</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2022-03, Vol.118, p.103949-103949, Article 103949
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2620083828
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Acceptability
Aluminum
Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate
Color
Composite materials
Composite Resins
Dental cement
Dental Materials
Dental restorative materials
Dentistry
Experimental composites
Filler fraction
Fillers
Humans
Light
Light transmission
Materials Testing
Mechanical properties
Monomers
Optical characteristics
Optical properties
Parameters
Particle size
Polymerization
Resins
Statistical analysis
Thickness
Translucency
Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate
Variance analysis
title Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A56%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optical%20characteristics%20of%20experimental%20dental%20composite%20resin%20materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Leyva%20del%20Rio,%20Diana&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=103949&rft.epage=103949&rft.pages=103949-103949&rft.artnum=103949&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103949&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646135858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-b35dd4d3ae68e2d2f285aec5c0d1be07a36cb642d91452d9926161fbb5f90d943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646135858&rft_id=info:pmid/35026354&rfr_iscdi=true