Loading…

Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used for early glottic cancer. Patients failing this treatment are referred to surgical management of their disease. Salvage partial laryngectomy (SPL) has the advantage of preserving laryngeal function with total laryngectomy (TL) remaining as a last resort. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2022-06, Vol.279 (6), p.3021-3027
Main Authors: Shapira, Udi, Warshavsky, Anton, Muhanna, Nidal, Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael, Nachalon, Yuval, Ungar, Omer J., Safadi, Ahmad, Carmel Neiderman, Narin N., Horowitz, Gilad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3
container_end_page 3027
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3021
container_title European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
container_volume 279
creator Shapira, Udi
Warshavsky, Anton
Muhanna, Nidal
Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael
Nachalon, Yuval
Ungar, Omer J.
Safadi, Ahmad
Carmel Neiderman, Narin N.
Horowitz, Gilad
description Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used for early glottic cancer. Patients failing this treatment are referred to surgical management of their disease. Salvage partial laryngectomy (SPL) has the advantage of preserving laryngeal function with total laryngectomy (TL) remaining as a last resort. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPL in preventing total laryngectomy, following failed RT, for early glottic cancer. Methods A meta-analysis of all published English literature was performed. All publications that included patients undergoing SPL were reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The search strategy identified 154 relevant articles. A total of 15 retrospective studies that included 323 suitable patients were subsequently analyzed in this meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was the rate of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) following SPL. The indications for salvage TL (i.e., disease recurrence and poorly functional larynxes) as well as subgroup analyses for open and trans-oral SPLs were also calculated. Results The overall rate of LFS following SPL was 81.2% (fixed effects model range: 75.7–86.8%). Salvage TL following SPL were performed in 96.8% due to disease recurrence and in 3.2% to poorly functional larynxes. A subgroup analysis showed a 90.4% LFS after open SPL and 78.6% following trans-oral SPL. Conclusion A high rate of successful salvage partial laryngectomies, regardless of surgical technique, is to be anticipated in well-selected patients after RT failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00405-022-07257-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621019134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621019134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyyQl2wMfiVO2CHES6rEBtaW40yqVHkUTxLUv8fQglixGmnm3CvNIeRc8CvBublGzjVPGJeScSMTw-QBmQutNNNGpodkznNlmNbGzMgJ4ppznuhcHZOZSrjKszyZk3LpwrZbgR_6dsuqAEBxDFM9uYa6aoBA0TWTWwHduDDUcdv8CdxQR3GLA7RuqD0NMNXwQV1X0hYGx1znmi3WeEqOKtcgnO3ngrw93L_ePbHly-Pz3e2SeaXNwEBLyJRROegCSgF5IQrvM2MKpbwXlVO6SFVuNEjgKi3KLC3jE5lOStAiLdWCXO56N6F_HwEH29booWlcB_2IVqZScJELpSMqd6gPPWKAym5C3cbXrOD2y67d2bXRrv22a2UMXez7x6KF8jfyozMCagdgPEVJwa77MUQL-F_tJ91WhzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621019134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Shapira, Udi ; Warshavsky, Anton ; Muhanna, Nidal ; Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael ; Nachalon, Yuval ; Ungar, Omer J. ; Safadi, Ahmad ; Carmel Neiderman, Narin N. ; Horowitz, Gilad</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapira, Udi ; Warshavsky, Anton ; Muhanna, Nidal ; Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael ; Nachalon, Yuval ; Ungar, Omer J. ; Safadi, Ahmad ; Carmel Neiderman, Narin N. ; Horowitz, Gilad</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used for early glottic cancer. Patients failing this treatment are referred to surgical management of their disease. Salvage partial laryngectomy (SPL) has the advantage of preserving laryngeal function with total laryngectomy (TL) remaining as a last resort. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPL in preventing total laryngectomy, following failed RT, for early glottic cancer. Methods A meta-analysis of all published English literature was performed. All publications that included patients undergoing SPL were reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The search strategy identified 154 relevant articles. A total of 15 retrospective studies that included 323 suitable patients were subsequently analyzed in this meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was the rate of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) following SPL. The indications for salvage TL (i.e., disease recurrence and poorly functional larynxes) as well as subgroup analyses for open and trans-oral SPLs were also calculated. Results The overall rate of LFS following SPL was 81.2% (fixed effects model range: 75.7–86.8%). Salvage TL following SPL were performed in 96.8% due to disease recurrence and in 3.2% to poorly functional larynxes. A subgroup analysis showed a 90.4% LFS after open SPL and 78.6% following trans-oral SPL. Conclusion A high rate of successful salvage partial laryngectomies, regardless of surgical technique, is to be anticipated in well-selected patients after RT failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07257-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35039895</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; Glottis - surgery ; Head and Neck Surgery ; Humans ; Laryngeal Neoplasms ; Laryngectomy - methods ; Laryngology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery ; Neurosurgery ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Retrospective Studies ; Salvage Therapy - methods ; Survival Rate ; Tongue Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2022-06, Vol.279 (6), p.3021-3027</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1741-2074</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039895$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapira, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warshavsky, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhanna, Nidal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachalon, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Omer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safadi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel Neiderman, Narin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Gilad</creatorcontrib><title>Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used for early glottic cancer. Patients failing this treatment are referred to surgical management of their disease. Salvage partial laryngectomy (SPL) has the advantage of preserving laryngeal function with total laryngectomy (TL) remaining as a last resort. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPL in preventing total laryngectomy, following failed RT, for early glottic cancer. Methods A meta-analysis of all published English literature was performed. All publications that included patients undergoing SPL were reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The search strategy identified 154 relevant articles. A total of 15 retrospective studies that included 323 suitable patients were subsequently analyzed in this meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was the rate of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) following SPL. The indications for salvage TL (i.e., disease recurrence and poorly functional larynxes) as well as subgroup analyses for open and trans-oral SPLs were also calculated. Results The overall rate of LFS following SPL was 81.2% (fixed effects model range: 75.7–86.8%). Salvage TL following SPL were performed in 96.8% due to disease recurrence and in 3.2% to poorly functional larynxes. A subgroup analysis showed a 90.4% LFS after open SPL and 78.6% following trans-oral SPL. Conclusion A high rate of successful salvage partial laryngectomies, regardless of surgical technique, is to be anticipated in well-selected patients after RT failure.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell</subject><subject>Glottis - surgery</subject><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal Neoplasms</subject><subject>Laryngectomy - methods</subject><subject>Laryngology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Salvage Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tongue Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyyQl2wMfiVO2CHES6rEBtaW40yqVHkUTxLUv8fQglixGmnm3CvNIeRc8CvBublGzjVPGJeScSMTw-QBmQutNNNGpodkznNlmNbGzMgJ4ppznuhcHZOZSrjKszyZk3LpwrZbgR_6dsuqAEBxDFM9uYa6aoBA0TWTWwHduDDUcdv8CdxQR3GLA7RuqD0NMNXwQV1X0hYGx1znmi3WeEqOKtcgnO3ngrw93L_ePbHly-Pz3e2SeaXNwEBLyJRROegCSgF5IQrvM2MKpbwXlVO6SFVuNEjgKi3KLC3jE5lOStAiLdWCXO56N6F_HwEH29booWlcB_2IVqZScJELpSMqd6gPPWKAym5C3cbXrOD2y67d2bXRrv22a2UMXez7x6KF8jfyozMCagdgPEVJwa77MUQL-F_tJ91WhzM</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Shapira, Udi</creator><creator>Warshavsky, Anton</creator><creator>Muhanna, Nidal</creator><creator>Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael</creator><creator>Nachalon, Yuval</creator><creator>Ungar, Omer J.</creator><creator>Safadi, Ahmad</creator><creator>Carmel Neiderman, Narin N.</creator><creator>Horowitz, Gilad</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-2074</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Shapira, Udi ; Warshavsky, Anton ; Muhanna, Nidal ; Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael ; Nachalon, Yuval ; Ungar, Omer J. ; Safadi, Ahmad ; Carmel Neiderman, Narin N. ; Horowitz, Gilad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell</topic><topic>Glottis - surgery</topic><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal Neoplasms</topic><topic>Laryngectomy - methods</topic><topic>Laryngology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Salvage Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tongue Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapira, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warshavsky, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhanna, Nidal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachalon, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Omer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safadi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel Neiderman, Narin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Gilad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapira, Udi</au><au>Warshavsky, Anton</au><au>Muhanna, Nidal</au><au>Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael</au><au>Nachalon, Yuval</au><au>Ungar, Omer J.</au><au>Safadi, Ahmad</au><au>Carmel Neiderman, Narin N.</au><au>Horowitz, Gilad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>279</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3021</spage><epage>3027</epage><pages>3021-3027</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used for early glottic cancer. Patients failing this treatment are referred to surgical management of their disease. Salvage partial laryngectomy (SPL) has the advantage of preserving laryngeal function with total laryngectomy (TL) remaining as a last resort. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPL in preventing total laryngectomy, following failed RT, for early glottic cancer. Methods A meta-analysis of all published English literature was performed. All publications that included patients undergoing SPL were reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The search strategy identified 154 relevant articles. A total of 15 retrospective studies that included 323 suitable patients were subsequently analyzed in this meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was the rate of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) following SPL. The indications for salvage TL (i.e., disease recurrence and poorly functional larynxes) as well as subgroup analyses for open and trans-oral SPLs were also calculated. Results The overall rate of LFS following SPL was 81.2% (fixed effects model range: 75.7–86.8%). Salvage TL following SPL were performed in 96.8% due to disease recurrence and in 3.2% to poorly functional larynxes. A subgroup analysis showed a 90.4% LFS after open SPL and 78.6% following trans-oral SPL. Conclusion A high rate of successful salvage partial laryngectomies, regardless of surgical technique, is to be anticipated in well-selected patients after RT failure.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35039895</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-022-07257-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-2074</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-4477
ispartof European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2022-06, Vol.279 (6), p.3021-3027
issn 0937-4477
1434-4726
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621019134
source Springer Nature
subjects Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Glottis - surgery
Head and Neck Surgery
Humans
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Laryngectomy - methods
Laryngology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
Neurosurgery
Otorhinolaryngology
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy - methods
Survival Rate
Tongue Neoplasms - surgery
title Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laryngectomy-free%20survival%20after%20salvage%20partial%20laryngectomy:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Shapira,%20Udi&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=279&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3021&rft.epage=3027&rft.pages=3021-3027&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-022-07257-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621019134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e42e83739e4bed1e9b1bcc877b33cc1fa34b63974e2e036bd86d895845de416d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621019134&rft_id=info:pmid/35039895&rfr_iscdi=true