Loading…

Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study

Aims The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectivene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2022-12, Vol.18 (6), p.578-585
Main Authors: Maeda, Osamu, Fukaya, Masahide, Koike, Masahiko, Miyata, Kazushi, Kanda, Mitsuro, Nishida, Kazuki, Ando, Masahiko, Kodera, Yasuhiro, Ando, Yuichi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443
container_end_page 585
container_issue 6
container_start_page 578
container_title Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 18
creator Maeda, Osamu
Fukaya, Masahide
Koike, Masahiko
Miyata, Kazushi
Kanda, Mitsuro
Nishida, Kazuki
Ando, Masahiko
Kodera, Yasuhiro
Ando, Yuichi
description Aims The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study. Methods The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate. Results Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle. Conclusions Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN. Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajco.13755
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621250776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621250776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALUdFS2PAAyBIbhDrFlzjOdDcacZmqUlnA2jrjHE8zcuJgO5R5Cl4Zl7RdsKg3to4-_TryT8gbzs55OR9hb8M5l1qpZ-SE60outKrl88e3UsfkZUp7xuRSLPkLciwVq6TS1Qn58y1iGDFC7n4hbYPFDL_Rn1HbpdGX6XBGYWip81OIYYpgO09zRMg9DpnedvmGjrhznd9FSLnraRhoCweqqQuRjiWhuDRDTGG8gR2CpxYGi_GCrmiZJKSbDU15ag-vyJEDn_D1_X1Kfnz-9H39dXF1_WWzXl0tbNlbLSqNCBqcZLDEViEKVXMleeO2W1u3HB1WWqgKnRRMNlrUTomGcdg2omZVJU_J-zl3jOHnhCmbvksWvYcBw5SMqAUXimldF_ruP7ovHzGU7YzQSgrV8FoX9WFWNoaUIjozxq6HeDCcmbuazF1N5l9NBb-9j5y2PbaP9KGXAvgMbjuPhyeizOpyfT2H_gVPhp4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753258167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Maeda, Osamu ; Fukaya, Masahide ; Koike, Masahiko ; Miyata, Kazushi ; Kanda, Mitsuro ; Nishida, Kazuki ; Ando, Masahiko ; Kodera, Yasuhiro ; Ando, Yuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Osamu ; Fukaya, Masahide ; Koike, Masahiko ; Miyata, Kazushi ; Kanda, Mitsuro ; Nishida, Kazuki ; Ando, Masahiko ; Kodera, Yasuhiro ; Ando, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><description>Aims The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study. Methods The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate. Results Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle. Conclusions Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN. Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-7555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13755</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35043574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>5-Fluorouracil ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin ; docetaxel ; Esophageal cancer ; Intravenous administration ; Neutropenia ; Patients ; pegfilgrastim ; Radiation therapy ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2022-12, Vol.18 (6), p.578-585</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5464-3819 ; 0000-0002-0315-9637 ; 0000-0003-0367-8557 ; 0000-0003-4700-6541 ; 0000-0002-6173-7474 ; 0000-0002-6849-2297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Masahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Kazushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanda, Mitsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodera, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Aims The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study. Methods The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate. Results Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle. Conclusions Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN. Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.</description><subject>5-Fluorouracil</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin</subject><subject>docetaxel</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pegfilgrastim</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1743-7555</issn><issn>1743-7563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALUdFS2PAAyBIbhDrFlzjOdDcacZmqUlnA2jrjHE8zcuJgO5R5Cl4Zl7RdsKg3to4-_TryT8gbzs55OR9hb8M5l1qpZ-SE60outKrl88e3UsfkZUp7xuRSLPkLciwVq6TS1Qn58y1iGDFC7n4hbYPFDL_Rn1HbpdGX6XBGYWip81OIYYpgO09zRMg9DpnedvmGjrhznd9FSLnraRhoCweqqQuRjiWhuDRDTGG8gR2CpxYGi_GCrmiZJKSbDU15ag-vyJEDn_D1_X1Kfnz-9H39dXF1_WWzXl0tbNlbLSqNCBqcZLDEViEKVXMleeO2W1u3HB1WWqgKnRRMNlrUTomGcdg2omZVJU_J-zl3jOHnhCmbvksWvYcBw5SMqAUXimldF_ruP7ovHzGU7YzQSgrV8FoX9WFWNoaUIjozxq6HeDCcmbuazF1N5l9NBb-9j5y2PbaP9KGXAvgMbjuPhyeizOpyfT2H_gVPhp4g</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Maeda, Osamu</creator><creator>Fukaya, Masahide</creator><creator>Koike, Masahiko</creator><creator>Miyata, Kazushi</creator><creator>Kanda, Mitsuro</creator><creator>Nishida, Kazuki</creator><creator>Ando, Masahiko</creator><creator>Kodera, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>Ando, Yuichi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-9637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-8557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-6541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-2297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</title><author>Maeda, Osamu ; Fukaya, Masahide ; Koike, Masahiko ; Miyata, Kazushi ; Kanda, Mitsuro ; Nishida, Kazuki ; Ando, Masahiko ; Kodera, Yasuhiro ; Ando, Yuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>5-Fluorouracil</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin</topic><topic>docetaxel</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pegfilgrastim</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Masahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Kazushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanda, Mitsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodera, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maeda, Osamu</au><au>Fukaya, Masahide</au><au>Koike, Masahiko</au><au>Miyata, Kazushi</au><au>Kanda, Mitsuro</au><au>Nishida, Kazuki</au><au>Ando, Masahiko</au><au>Kodera, Yasuhiro</au><au>Ando, Yuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>578-585</pages><issn>1743-7555</issn><eissn>1743-7563</eissn><abstract>Aims The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study. Methods The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate. Results Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle. Conclusions Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN. Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35043574</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajco.13755</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-9637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-8557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-6541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-2297</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-7555
ispartof Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2022-12, Vol.18 (6), p.578-585
issn 1743-7555
1743-7563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621250776
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects 5-Fluorouracil
Chemoradiotherapy
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin
docetaxel
Esophageal cancer
Intravenous administration
Neutropenia
Patients
pegfilgrastim
Radiation therapy
Surgery
title Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20docetaxel,%20cisplatin,%20and%20fluorouracil%20treatment%20with%20pegfilgrastim%20on%20day%207%20for%20patients%20with%20esophageal%20cancer:%20A%20phase%20II%20study&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Maeda,%20Osamu&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=578-585&rft.issn=1743-7555&rft.eissn=1743-7563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajco.13755&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621250776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753258167&rft_id=info:pmid/35043574&rfr_iscdi=true