Loading…
Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study
Aims The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectivene...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2022-12, Vol.18 (6), p.578-585 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443 |
container_end_page | 585 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 578 |
container_title | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Maeda, Osamu Fukaya, Masahide Koike, Masahiko Miyata, Kazushi Kanda, Mitsuro Nishida, Kazuki Ando, Masahiko Kodera, Yasuhiro Ando, Yuichi |
description | Aims
The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study.
Methods
The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate.
Results
Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle.
Conclusions
Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.
Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajco.13755 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621250776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621250776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALUdFS2PAAyBIbhDrFlzjOdDcacZmqUlnA2jrjHE8zcuJgO5R5Cl4Zl7RdsKg3to4-_TryT8gbzs55OR9hb8M5l1qpZ-SE60outKrl88e3UsfkZUp7xuRSLPkLciwVq6TS1Qn58y1iGDFC7n4hbYPFDL_Rn1HbpdGX6XBGYWip81OIYYpgO09zRMg9DpnedvmGjrhznd9FSLnraRhoCweqqQuRjiWhuDRDTGG8gR2CpxYGi_GCrmiZJKSbDU15ag-vyJEDn_D1_X1Kfnz-9H39dXF1_WWzXl0tbNlbLSqNCBqcZLDEViEKVXMleeO2W1u3HB1WWqgKnRRMNlrUTomGcdg2omZVJU_J-zl3jOHnhCmbvksWvYcBw5SMqAUXimldF_ruP7ovHzGU7YzQSgrV8FoX9WFWNoaUIjozxq6HeDCcmbuazF1N5l9NBb-9j5y2PbaP9KGXAvgMbjuPhyeizOpyfT2H_gVPhp4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753258167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Maeda, Osamu ; Fukaya, Masahide ; Koike, Masahiko ; Miyata, Kazushi ; Kanda, Mitsuro ; Nishida, Kazuki ; Ando, Masahiko ; Kodera, Yasuhiro ; Ando, Yuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Osamu ; Fukaya, Masahide ; Koike, Masahiko ; Miyata, Kazushi ; Kanda, Mitsuro ; Nishida, Kazuki ; Ando, Masahiko ; Kodera, Yasuhiro ; Ando, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study.
Methods
The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate.
Results
Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle.
Conclusions
Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.
Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-7555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13755</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35043574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>5-Fluorouracil ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin ; docetaxel ; Esophageal cancer ; Intravenous administration ; Neutropenia ; Patients ; pegfilgrastim ; Radiation therapy ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2022-12, Vol.18 (6), p.578-585</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5464-3819 ; 0000-0002-0315-9637 ; 0000-0003-0367-8557 ; 0000-0003-4700-6541 ; 0000-0002-6173-7474 ; 0000-0002-6849-2297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Masahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Kazushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanda, Mitsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodera, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Aims
The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study.
Methods
The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate.
Results
Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle.
Conclusions
Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.
Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.</description><subject>5-Fluorouracil</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin</subject><subject>docetaxel</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pegfilgrastim</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1743-7555</issn><issn>1743-7563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALUdFS2PAAyBIbhDrFlzjOdDcacZmqUlnA2jrjHE8zcuJgO5R5Cl4Zl7RdsKg3to4-_TryT8gbzs55OR9hb8M5l1qpZ-SE60outKrl88e3UsfkZUp7xuRSLPkLciwVq6TS1Qn58y1iGDFC7n4hbYPFDL_Rn1HbpdGX6XBGYWip81OIYYpgO09zRMg9DpnedvmGjrhznd9FSLnraRhoCweqqQuRjiWhuDRDTGG8gR2CpxYGi_GCrmiZJKSbDU15ag-vyJEDn_D1_X1Kfnz-9H39dXF1_WWzXl0tbNlbLSqNCBqcZLDEViEKVXMleeO2W1u3HB1WWqgKnRRMNlrUTomGcdg2omZVJU_J-zl3jOHnhCmbvksWvYcBw5SMqAUXimldF_ruP7ovHzGU7YzQSgrV8FoX9WFWNoaUIjozxq6HeDCcmbuazF1N5l9NBb-9j5y2PbaP9KGXAvgMbjuPhyeizOpyfT2H_gVPhp4g</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Maeda, Osamu</creator><creator>Fukaya, Masahide</creator><creator>Koike, Masahiko</creator><creator>Miyata, Kazushi</creator><creator>Kanda, Mitsuro</creator><creator>Nishida, Kazuki</creator><creator>Ando, Masahiko</creator><creator>Kodera, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>Ando, Yuichi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-9637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-8557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-6541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-2297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</title><author>Maeda, Osamu ; Fukaya, Masahide ; Koike, Masahiko ; Miyata, Kazushi ; Kanda, Mitsuro ; Nishida, Kazuki ; Ando, Masahiko ; Kodera, Yasuhiro ; Ando, Yuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>5-Fluorouracil</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin</topic><topic>docetaxel</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pegfilgrastim</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukaya, Masahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Kazushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanda, Mitsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodera, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maeda, Osamu</au><au>Fukaya, Masahide</au><au>Koike, Masahiko</au><au>Miyata, Kazushi</au><au>Kanda, Mitsuro</au><au>Nishida, Kazuki</au><au>Ando, Masahiko</au><au>Kodera, Yasuhiro</au><au>Ando, Yuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>578-585</pages><issn>1743-7555</issn><eissn>1743-7563</eissn><abstract>Aims
The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5‐FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study.
Methods
The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5‐FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1–5. A single 3.6‐mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade‐2/3 histopathological response rate.
Results
Thirty‐seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty‐four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle.
Conclusions
Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.
Graphical : We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim and evaluated their effectiveness and safety. Although DCF is effective as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen, pegfilgrastim on day 7 seems to be insufficient for preventing febrile neutropenia.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35043574</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajco.13755</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-9637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-8557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-6541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-2297</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1743-7555 |
ispartof | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2022-12, Vol.18 (6), p.578-585 |
issn | 1743-7555 1743-7563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621250776 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy Cisplatin docetaxel Esophageal cancer Intravenous administration Neutropenia Patients pegfilgrastim Radiation therapy Surgery |
title | Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20docetaxel,%20cisplatin,%20and%20fluorouracil%20treatment%20with%20pegfilgrastim%20on%20day%207%20for%20patients%20with%20esophageal%20cancer:%20A%20phase%20II%20study&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Maeda,%20Osamu&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=578-585&rft.issn=1743-7555&rft.eissn=1743-7563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajco.13755&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621250776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-47eea7af30a9ed5ee25615318fbbc6d1efe47254ef32038726f52801ab8260443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753258167&rft_id=info:pmid/35043574&rfr_iscdi=true |