Silibinin Can Promote Bone Regeneration of Selenium Hydrogel by Reducing the Oxidative Stress Pathway in Ovariectomized Rats

• Published in: Calcified tissue international 2022-06, Vol.110 (6), p.723-735
• Main Authors: Tao, Zhoushan, Li, Tian-Lin, Yang, Min, Xu, Hong-Guang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biochemistry; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Bone growth; Bone mineral density; Cell Biology; Cell viability; Computed tomography; Drug therapy; Endocrinology; Femur; Hydrogels; Life Sciences; Metaphysis; Mineralization; Original Research; Orthopedics; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Ovariectomy; Oxidative stress; Public health; Regeneration; Selenium; Silibinin; SIRT1 protein; Superoxide dismutase
• ISSN: 1432-0827; 0171-967X; 1432-0827
• DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00936-y

Osteoporosis-related bone defects are a major public health concern. Considering poor effects of a singular pharmacological treatment, many have sought combination therapies, including local treatment combined with systemic intervention. Based on recent evidence that selenium and silibinin increase bone formation and bone mineral density, it is hypothesized that systemic administration with silibinin plus local treatment with selenium may have an additive effect on bone regeneration in an OVX rat model with bone defects. To verify this hypothesis, 3-month-old ovariectomized Sprague- Dawley rats ( n  = 10/gp) were intraperitoneally with a dose of 50 mg/kg silibinin with selenium hydrogel scaffolds implanted into femoral metaphysis bone defect. Moreover, the MC3T3-E1 cells were co-cultured with selenium and silibinin, and observed any change of cell viability, ROS, and osteogenic activity. Experiment results show that the cell mineralization and osteogenic activity of silibinin plus selenium (SSe) group is enormously higher than the control (Con) group and selenium (Se) group, while ROS appears to be immensely reduced. Osteogenic protein expressions such as SIRT1, SOD2, RUNX-2 and OC of SSe group are significantly higher than Con group and Se group. Micro-CT and Histological analysis evaluation display that group SSe, compared with Con group and Se group, presents the strongest effect on bone regeneration, bone mineralization and higher expression of SIRT1 and SOD2. RT-qPCR analysis indicates that SSe group manifests increased SIRT1, SOD1, SOD2 and CAT than the Con group and Se group ( p