Loading…
Feasibility and Acceptability Testing of Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies for Residential Care
The current study examined stakeholder perspectives on the perceived effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of 20 evidence-based strategies appropriate for residential care via an online survey ( = 162). Most participants worked in long-term care (83%), were direct care providers (62%), worke...
Saved in:
Published in: | Research in gerontological nursing 2022-01, Vol.15 (1), p.27-38 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-eebe0a64c17c412744c8a35d1266eb25182da5ba87527bab16cca9ba45f9d5333 |
container_end_page | 38 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Research in gerontological nursing |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Keller, Heather Wei, Cindy Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini Syed, Safura Lengyel, Christina Yoon, Minn N Slaughter, Susan E Gaspar, Phyllis M Heckman, George A Mentes, Janet |
description | The current study examined stakeholder perspectives on the perceived effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of 20 evidence-based strategies appropriate for residential care via an online survey (
= 162). Most participants worked in long-term care (83%), were direct care providers (62%), worked in food/nutrition roles (55%), and identified as female (94%). Strategies that were rated as effective, feasible, and likely to be used in the future were social drinking events, increased drink options at meals, and pre-thickened drinks. Participants also listed their top strategies for inclusion in a multicomponent intervention. Responses to open-ended questions provided insight on implementation, compliance, and budget constraints. Participant perspectives provide insight into developing a multicomponent intervention. Strategies prioritized for such an intervention include: staff education, social drinking opportunities, drinks trolley, volunteer support, improved beverage availability, hydration reminders, offering preferred beverages, and prompting residents to drink using various cues. [
(1), 27-38.]. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3928/19404921-20211209-02 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621662086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621662086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-eebe0a64c17c412744c8a35d1266eb25182da5ba87527bab16cca9ba45f9d5333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5EFL16i-z_JsZbWCgVB6zlMNpOyJU3qbir025vY1oOneQy_9xjmEXLL2aNMRfLEU8VUKngkmOBcsDRi4owMeSqTSCijznutWNQzA3IVwpoxI6WRl2QgNVMqMXpIYIYQXO4q1-4p1AUdW4vbFo6bJYbW1SvalHT67QqsLUbPELCg833hoXVNTT_aTuDKYaBl4-k7hh5sHVR0Ah6vyUUJVcCb4xyRz9l0OZlHi7eX18l4EVmRqDZCzJGBUZbHVnERK2UTkLrgwhjMheaJKEDnkMRaxDnk3FgLaQ5Kl2mhpZQj8nDI3frma9fdnW1csFhVUGOzC5kwghsjWGI69P4fum52vu6u-6WYTDuwo9SBsr4JwWOZbb3bgN9nnGV9BdmpguxUQcZ6290xfJdvsPgznX4ufwCRioDs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621039662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and Acceptability Testing of Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies for Residential Care</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Keller, Heather ; Wei, Cindy ; Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini ; Syed, Safura ; Lengyel, Christina ; Yoon, Minn N ; Slaughter, Susan E ; Gaspar, Phyllis M ; Heckman, George A ; Mentes, Janet</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, Heather ; Wei, Cindy ; Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini ; Syed, Safura ; Lengyel, Christina ; Yoon, Minn N ; Slaughter, Susan E ; Gaspar, Phyllis M ; Heckman, George A ; Mentes, Janet</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examined stakeholder perspectives on the perceived effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of 20 evidence-based strategies appropriate for residential care via an online survey (
= 162). Most participants worked in long-term care (83%), were direct care providers (62%), worked in food/nutrition roles (55%), and identified as female (94%). Strategies that were rated as effective, feasible, and likely to be used in the future were social drinking events, increased drink options at meals, and pre-thickened drinks. Participants also listed their top strategies for inclusion in a multicomponent intervention. Responses to open-ended questions provided insight on implementation, compliance, and budget constraints. Participant perspectives provide insight into developing a multicomponent intervention. Strategies prioritized for such an intervention include: staff education, social drinking opportunities, drinks trolley, volunteer support, improved beverage availability, hydration reminders, offering preferred beverages, and prompting residents to drink using various cues. [
(1), 27-38.].</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-4921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20211209-02</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35044865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SLACK INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Delirium ; Dementia ; Dysphagia ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Hydration ; Intervention ; Long term health care ; Long-Term Care ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Qualitative research ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Research in gerontological nursing, 2022-01, Vol.15 (1), p.27-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2022, SLACK Incorporated</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-eebe0a64c17c412744c8a35d1266eb25182da5ba87527bab16cca9ba45f9d5333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621039662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621039662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syed, Safura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengyel, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Minn N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaughter, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Phyllis M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckman, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mentes, Janet</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and Acceptability Testing of Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies for Residential Care</title><title>Research in gerontological nursing</title><addtitle>Res Gerontol Nurs</addtitle><description>The current study examined stakeholder perspectives on the perceived effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of 20 evidence-based strategies appropriate for residential care via an online survey (
= 162). Most participants worked in long-term care (83%), were direct care providers (62%), worked in food/nutrition roles (55%), and identified as female (94%). Strategies that were rated as effective, feasible, and likely to be used in the future were social drinking events, increased drink options at meals, and pre-thickened drinks. Participants also listed their top strategies for inclusion in a multicomponent intervention. Responses to open-ended questions provided insight on implementation, compliance, and budget constraints. Participant perspectives provide insight into developing a multicomponent intervention. Strategies prioritized for such an intervention include: staff education, social drinking opportunities, drinks trolley, volunteer support, improved beverage availability, hydration reminders, offering preferred beverages, and prompting residents to drink using various cues. [
(1), 27-38.].</description><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Long-Term Care</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>1940-4921</issn><issn>1938-2464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5EFL16i-z_JsZbWCgVB6zlMNpOyJU3qbir025vY1oOneQy_9xjmEXLL2aNMRfLEU8VUKngkmOBcsDRi4owMeSqTSCijznutWNQzA3IVwpoxI6WRl2QgNVMqMXpIYIYQXO4q1-4p1AUdW4vbFo6bJYbW1SvalHT67QqsLUbPELCg833hoXVNTT_aTuDKYaBl4-k7hh5sHVR0Ah6vyUUJVcCb4xyRz9l0OZlHi7eX18l4EVmRqDZCzJGBUZbHVnERK2UTkLrgwhjMheaJKEDnkMRaxDnk3FgLaQ5Kl2mhpZQj8nDI3frma9fdnW1csFhVUGOzC5kwghsjWGI69P4fum52vu6u-6WYTDuwo9SBsr4JwWOZbb3bgN9nnGV9BdmpguxUQcZ6290xfJdvsPgznX4ufwCRioDs</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Keller, Heather</creator><creator>Wei, Cindy</creator><creator>Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini</creator><creator>Syed, Safura</creator><creator>Lengyel, Christina</creator><creator>Yoon, Minn N</creator><creator>Slaughter, Susan E</creator><creator>Gaspar, Phyllis M</creator><creator>Heckman, George A</creator><creator>Mentes, Janet</creator><general>SLACK INCORPORATED</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Feasibility and Acceptability Testing of Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies for Residential Care</title><author>Keller, Heather ; Wei, Cindy ; Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini ; Syed, Safura ; Lengyel, Christina ; Yoon, Minn N ; Slaughter, Susan E ; Gaspar, Phyllis M ; Heckman, George A ; Mentes, Janet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-eebe0a64c17c412744c8a35d1266eb25182da5ba87527bab16cca9ba45f9d5333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Long-Term Care</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syed, Safura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengyel, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Minn N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaughter, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Phyllis M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckman, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mentes, Janet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Hospital Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Proquest Medical Database</collection><collection>Proquest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in gerontological nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, Heather</au><au>Wei, Cindy</au><au>Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini</au><au>Syed, Safura</au><au>Lengyel, Christina</au><au>Yoon, Minn N</au><au>Slaughter, Susan E</au><au>Gaspar, Phyllis M</au><au>Heckman, George A</au><au>Mentes, Janet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and Acceptability Testing of Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies for Residential Care</atitle><jtitle>Research in gerontological nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Res Gerontol Nurs</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>27-38</pages><issn>1940-4921</issn><eissn>1938-2464</eissn><abstract>The current study examined stakeholder perspectives on the perceived effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of 20 evidence-based strategies appropriate for residential care via an online survey (
= 162). Most participants worked in long-term care (83%), were direct care providers (62%), worked in food/nutrition roles (55%), and identified as female (94%). Strategies that were rated as effective, feasible, and likely to be used in the future were social drinking events, increased drink options at meals, and pre-thickened drinks. Participants also listed their top strategies for inclusion in a multicomponent intervention. Responses to open-ended questions provided insight on implementation, compliance, and budget constraints. Participant perspectives provide insight into developing a multicomponent intervention. Strategies prioritized for such an intervention include: staff education, social drinking opportunities, drinks trolley, volunteer support, improved beverage availability, hydration reminders, offering preferred beverages, and prompting residents to drink using various cues. [
(1), 27-38.].</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SLACK INCORPORATED</pub><pmid>35044865</pmid><doi>10.3928/19404921-20211209-02</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1940-4921 |
ispartof | Research in gerontological nursing, 2022-01, Vol.15 (1), p.27-38 |
issn | 1940-4921 1938-2464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621662086 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Delirium Dementia Dysphagia Feasibility Studies Female Humans Hydration Intervention Long term health care Long-Term Care Nursing homes Older people Qualitative research Surveys and Questionnaires Workforce planning |
title | Feasibility and Acceptability Testing of Evidence-Based Hydration Strategies for Residential Care |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T21%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20Acceptability%20Testing%20of%20Evidence-Based%20Hydration%20Strategies%20for%20Residential%20Care&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20gerontological%20nursing&rft.au=Keller,%20Heather&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=27-38&rft.issn=1940-4921&rft.eissn=1938-2464&rft_id=info:doi/10.3928/19404921-20211209-02&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621662086%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-eebe0a64c17c412744c8a35d1266eb25182da5ba87527bab16cca9ba45f9d5333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621039662&rft_id=info:pmid/35044865&rfr_iscdi=true |