Factors influencing the orthodontic treatment plan in Class II malocclusion

• Published in: American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2022-06, Vol.161 (6), p.829-837.e1
• Main Authors: Alsaggaf, Doaa H., Afify, Ahmed R., Zawawi, Khalid H., Alsulaimani, Fahad F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0889-5406; 1097-6752
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.034

This study aimed to investigate the influence of orthodontists’ demographics and patient characteristics on the orthodontic treatment plan decision for borderline Class II Division 1 malocclusion in growing patients. An electronic survey was distributed to orthodontists through the American Association of Orthodontists. Participating orthodontists were asked to select their preferred orthodontic treatment plan for 3 patients with borderline Class II Division 1 malocclusion. The survey also included questions about the patient-related factors contributing to the treatment decision for each patient. A total of 113 orthodontists completed the survey. United States–trained orthodontists were more likely to select growth modification and nonextraction relative to extraction (odds ratio, 3.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-12.12; odds ratio, 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-10.91, respectively). Clinicians with >15 years of experience were 72% less likely to prefer nonextraction relative to extraction in 1 patient and were 67% less likely to prefer growth modification relative to extraction in another patient. Working solely in private practice was associated with higher, but not statistically significant, odds of growth modification and nonextraction. The practice location was also associated with treatment plan decisions; however, findings were inconsistent between the patients. The orthodontist’s experience, place of education, location, and type of practice appear to influence the preferred treatment plan for Class II malocclusion. Overall, the patient’s profile and age were the most considered patient-related factors for growth modification, whereas the patient’s profile, amount of crowding, and smile esthetics were the most considered factors for preferring extraction and nonextraction treatment modalities. •Considerable variations exist in orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion.•Orthodontists’ demographics could influence the treatment of Class II malocclusion.•Orthodontists seem to evaluate the same patients’ characteristics differently.•The patient’s profile is the most appraised factor by orthodontists.