Loading…

Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration

Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2022-08, Vol.110 (8), p.1771-1779
Main Authors: Thao Le, Thi Thanh, Makkar, Preeti, Tripathi, Garima, Lee, Byong‐Taek
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43
container_end_page 1779
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1771
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
container_volume 110
creator Thao Le, Thi Thanh
Makkar, Preeti
Tripathi, Garima
Lee, Byong‐Taek
description Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.b.35033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630931304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674590867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90btOwzAUBmALgWgpTOwoEgsSavElsdOxLZeCQDDAbNnJCXWUS7ETUDcegWfkSXAvdGBgsiV__n18DkLHBA8IxvQi1-VAD1iEGdtBXRJFtB8OY7K73QvWQQfO5R5zHLF91GEREZxi3EX5U23r1gWTy-koKE1iazefgQUXFCqFKtC2dTPTwPfnl1YO0sBUOSSN0gUEuq4gcK12jWnaxl_JahuYcm7rdw9XpxZeoQKrGlNXh2gvU4WDo83aQy_XV8-Taf_-8eZ2MrrvJyHlrC9EmmJC4lQBUVhlsY4FwYpDyFjGYs4586cRpJpmPFJYZDQToUjjIY1p4lUPna1zfSFvLbhGlsYlUBSqAv9V6R_BQ0YYXtLTPzSvW1v56rwSYTTEMRdena_VsjvOQibn1pTKLiTBcjkC6UcgtVyNwOuTTWarS0i39rfnHtA1-DAFLP7Lknfjh_E69QcFXJKx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674590867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Thao Le, Thi Thanh ; Makkar, Preeti ; Tripathi, Garima ; Lee, Byong‐Taek</creator><creatorcontrib>Thao Le, Thi Thanh ; Makkar, Preeti ; Tripathi, Garima ; Lee, Byong‐Taek</creatorcontrib><description>Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35176200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatibility ; Biological activity ; Biomedical materials ; Bone biomaterials ; Bone Cements - pharmacology ; Bone growth ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Substitutes - pharmacology ; Calcium phosphates ; Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology ; CDHA microspheres ; Cell migration ; Compressive strength ; CPC ; Degradation ; IBS ; Inflammation ; Materials research ; Materials science ; Microspheres ; Osteogenesis ; Porosity ; Rats ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; Substitute bone</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022-08, Vol.110 (8), p.1771-1779</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9072-0033</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkar, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Garima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Byong‐Taek</creatorcontrib><title>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater</addtitle><description>Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone biomaterials</subject><subject>Bone Cements - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium phosphates</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</subject><subject>CDHA microspheres</subject><subject>Cell migration</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>CPC</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>IBS</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Materials research</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Microspheres</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90btOwzAUBmALgWgpTOwoEgsSavElsdOxLZeCQDDAbNnJCXWUS7ETUDcegWfkSXAvdGBgsiV__n18DkLHBA8IxvQi1-VAD1iEGdtBXRJFtB8OY7K73QvWQQfO5R5zHLF91GEREZxi3EX5U23r1gWTy-koKE1iazefgQUXFCqFKtC2dTPTwPfnl1YO0sBUOSSN0gUEuq4gcK12jWnaxl_JahuYcm7rdw9XpxZeoQKrGlNXh2gvU4WDo83aQy_XV8-Taf_-8eZ2MrrvJyHlrC9EmmJC4lQBUVhlsY4FwYpDyFjGYs4586cRpJpmPFJYZDQToUjjIY1p4lUPna1zfSFvLbhGlsYlUBSqAv9V6R_BQ0YYXtLTPzSvW1v56rwSYTTEMRdena_VsjvOQibn1pTKLiTBcjkC6UcgtVyNwOuTTWarS0i39rfnHtA1-DAFLP7Lknfjh_E69QcFXJKx</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</creator><creator>Makkar, Preeti</creator><creator>Tripathi, Garima</creator><creator>Lee, Byong‐Taek</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-0033</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</title><author>Thao Le, Thi Thanh ; Makkar, Preeti ; Tripathi, Garima ; Lee, Byong‐Taek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone biomaterials</topic><topic>Bone Cements - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium phosphates</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</topic><topic>CDHA microspheres</topic><topic>Cell migration</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>CPC</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>IBS</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Materials research</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Microspheres</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkar, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Garima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Byong‐Taek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</au><au>Makkar, Preeti</au><au>Tripathi, Garima</au><au>Lee, Byong‐Taek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1771</spage><epage>1779</epage><pages>1771-1779</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35176200</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.35033</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-0033</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4973
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022-08, Vol.110 (8), p.1771-1779
issn 1552-4973
1552-4981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630931304
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Biocompatibility
Biological activity
Biomedical materials
Bone biomaterials
Bone Cements - pharmacology
Bone growth
Bone Regeneration
Bone Substitutes - pharmacology
Calcium phosphates
Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology
CDHA microspheres
Cell migration
Compressive strength
CPC
Degradation
IBS
Inflammation
Materials research
Materials science
Microspheres
Osteogenesis
Porosity
Rats
Regeneration
Regeneration (physiology)
Substitute bone
title Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A47%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Porous%20CDHA%20microspheres%20laden%20brushite%E2%80%90based%20injectable%20bone%20substitutes%20for%20improved%20bone%20regeneration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Thao%20Le,%20Thi%20Thanh&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1771&rft.epage=1779&rft.pages=1771-1779&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674590867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674590867&rft_id=info:pmid/35176200&rfr_iscdi=true