Loading…
Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration
Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2022-08, Vol.110 (8), p.1771-1779 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43 |
container_end_page | 1779 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1771 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Thao Le, Thi Thanh Makkar, Preeti Tripathi, Garima Lee, Byong‐Taek |
description | Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.b.35033 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630931304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674590867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90btOwzAUBmALgWgpTOwoEgsSavElsdOxLZeCQDDAbNnJCXWUS7ETUDcegWfkSXAvdGBgsiV__n18DkLHBA8IxvQi1-VAD1iEGdtBXRJFtB8OY7K73QvWQQfO5R5zHLF91GEREZxi3EX5U23r1gWTy-koKE1iazefgQUXFCqFKtC2dTPTwPfnl1YO0sBUOSSN0gUEuq4gcK12jWnaxl_JahuYcm7rdw9XpxZeoQKrGlNXh2gvU4WDo83aQy_XV8-Taf_-8eZ2MrrvJyHlrC9EmmJC4lQBUVhlsY4FwYpDyFjGYs4586cRpJpmPFJYZDQToUjjIY1p4lUPna1zfSFvLbhGlsYlUBSqAv9V6R_BQ0YYXtLTPzSvW1v56rwSYTTEMRdena_VsjvOQibn1pTKLiTBcjkC6UcgtVyNwOuTTWarS0i39rfnHtA1-DAFLP7Lknfjh_E69QcFXJKx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674590867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Thao Le, Thi Thanh ; Makkar, Preeti ; Tripathi, Garima ; Lee, Byong‐Taek</creator><creatorcontrib>Thao Le, Thi Thanh ; Makkar, Preeti ; Tripathi, Garima ; Lee, Byong‐Taek</creatorcontrib><description>Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35176200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatibility ; Biological activity ; Biomedical materials ; Bone biomaterials ; Bone Cements - pharmacology ; Bone growth ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Substitutes - pharmacology ; Calcium phosphates ; Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology ; CDHA microspheres ; Cell migration ; Compressive strength ; CPC ; Degradation ; IBS ; Inflammation ; Materials research ; Materials science ; Microspheres ; Osteogenesis ; Porosity ; Rats ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; Substitute bone</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022-08, Vol.110 (8), p.1771-1779</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9072-0033</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkar, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Garima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Byong‐Taek</creatorcontrib><title>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater</addtitle><description>Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone biomaterials</subject><subject>Bone Cements - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium phosphates</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</subject><subject>CDHA microspheres</subject><subject>Cell migration</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>CPC</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>IBS</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Materials research</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Microspheres</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90btOwzAUBmALgWgpTOwoEgsSavElsdOxLZeCQDDAbNnJCXWUS7ETUDcegWfkSXAvdGBgsiV__n18DkLHBA8IxvQi1-VAD1iEGdtBXRJFtB8OY7K73QvWQQfO5R5zHLF91GEREZxi3EX5U23r1gWTy-koKE1iazefgQUXFCqFKtC2dTPTwPfnl1YO0sBUOSSN0gUEuq4gcK12jWnaxl_JahuYcm7rdw9XpxZeoQKrGlNXh2gvU4WDo83aQy_XV8-Taf_-8eZ2MrrvJyHlrC9EmmJC4lQBUVhlsY4FwYpDyFjGYs4586cRpJpmPFJYZDQToUjjIY1p4lUPna1zfSFvLbhGlsYlUBSqAv9V6R_BQ0YYXtLTPzSvW1v56rwSYTTEMRdena_VsjvOQibn1pTKLiTBcjkC6UcgtVyNwOuTTWarS0i39rfnHtA1-DAFLP7Lknfjh_E69QcFXJKx</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</creator><creator>Makkar, Preeti</creator><creator>Tripathi, Garima</creator><creator>Lee, Byong‐Taek</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-0033</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</title><author>Thao Le, Thi Thanh ; Makkar, Preeti ; Tripathi, Garima ; Lee, Byong‐Taek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone biomaterials</topic><topic>Bone Cements - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium phosphates</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</topic><topic>CDHA microspheres</topic><topic>Cell migration</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>CPC</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>IBS</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Materials research</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Microspheres</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkar, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Garima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Byong‐Taek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thao Le, Thi Thanh</au><au>Makkar, Preeti</au><au>Tripathi, Garima</au><au>Lee, Byong‐Taek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1771</spage><epage>1779</epage><pages>1771-1779</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Porous CDHA microspheres were incorporated into innovative injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) to enhance the rate of degradation and bioactivity of bone regeneration. With varying content of CDHA microspheres, the final setting time varied between 12 and 17 min, which is adequate for surgeons to accomplish the implantation. Compressive strength ranged between 6 and 8 MPa, until the addition of porous CDHA microsphere into CPC reached 20 vol %, but decreased dramatically after 30 vol % addition. Therefore, CPC with 20 vol % addition of porous CDHA microspheres was found appropriate for in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility studies. Histological assessment identified new bone formation around the injected bone substitute without significant inflammatory reactions. In vivo analysis of rat femoral defects revealed a threefold higher bone formation in CPC/CDHA 20 vol % than in CPC, due to the more cell migration and penetration into CPC by the existence of porous CDHA microspheres. Based on the promising results obtained, this novel injectable bone substitute may be useful in bone regeneration.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35176200</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.35033</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-0033</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-4973 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022-08, Vol.110 (8), p.1771-1779 |
issn | 1552-4973 1552-4981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630931304 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animals Biocompatibility Biological activity Biomedical materials Bone biomaterials Bone Cements - pharmacology Bone growth Bone Regeneration Bone Substitutes - pharmacology Calcium phosphates Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology CDHA microspheres Cell migration Compressive strength CPC Degradation IBS Inflammation Materials research Materials science Microspheres Osteogenesis Porosity Rats Regeneration Regeneration (physiology) Substitute bone |
title | Porous CDHA microspheres laden brushite‐based injectable bone substitutes for improved bone regeneration |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A47%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Porous%20CDHA%20microspheres%20laden%20brushite%E2%80%90based%20injectable%20bone%20substitutes%20for%20improved%20bone%20regeneration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Thao%20Le,%20Thi%20Thanh&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1771&rft.epage=1779&rft.pages=1771-1779&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674590867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-77dd0118dae1a0af8b8710a6e433f3866631185edb2f65a07f2f747d89282ce43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674590867&rft_id=info:pmid/35176200&rfr_iscdi=true |