Loading…
Femoral nerve inguinal approach versus proximal femoral triangle ap proach for continuous regional analgesia in active rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomised study
A catheter in femoral nerve block (F-Cath) is an effective regional analgesia technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but results in significant quadriceps weakness. The femoral triangle catheter (FTB-Cath) seems to be an interesting alternative. In this study, we aim to demonstrate that the nerv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anaesthesia critical care & pain medicine 2022-04, Vol.41 (2), p.101043-101043, Article 101043 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A catheter in femoral nerve block (F-Cath) is an effective regional analgesia technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but results in significant quadriceps weakness. The femoral triangle catheter (FTB-Cath) seems to be an interesting alternative. In this study, we aim to demonstrate that the nerve block administration for analgesic purposes via an FTB-Cath results in less quadriceps weakness than via an F-Cath.
This study included patients scheduled for TKA performed under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomised to receive either an F-Cath or an FTB-Cath. A unique regimen of 0.2% ropivacaine was administrated for 72 h. The primary endpoint was quadriceps strength assessed clinically on postoperative day (POD) 2 by the Manual Muscle Test (MMT) using a motor grading scores (0–5). The secondary endpoints were quadriceps strength measured by a dynamometer, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the 30-m walk test (30MWT) and pain scores.
Forty-four patients were analysed (22 in each group). On POD 2, 77.3% of the patients in the FTB-Cath group had MMT scores ≥ 4 and 13.6% in the F-Cath group (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2352-5568 2352-5568 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101043 |