Wear resistance of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium cast iron re-evaluated

A comparison of the wear resistances of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium (15-3) cast irons has been made under different testing conditions. Several kinds of wear tester were employed (reciprocating grooving tester, dry sand rubber wheel tester, single-pass pendulum impact grooving tester, and blasting e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wear 1993-06, Vol.166 (1), p.37-40
Main Authors: Jinzhu, Liu, Shizhuo, Li, Yongfa, Man
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Contact of materials. Friction. Wear
Exact sciences and technology
Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology
Metals. Metallurgy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Wear
container_volume 166
creator Jinzhu, Liu
Shizhuo, Li
Yongfa, Man
description A comparison of the wear resistances of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium (15-3) cast irons has been made under different testing conditions. Several kinds of wear tester were employed (reciprocating grooving tester, dry sand rubber wheel tester, single-pass pendulum impact grooving tester, and blasting erosion tester). The results show that whereas Ni-hard 4 seems to be more suitable to resist blasting erosion, high-chromium cast iron is better at resisting grooving wear, the ranking of materials changing with testing conditions. The measured wear resistance of the irons has been explained in terms of microstructure and hardness. Material removal occurred as a result of different mechanisms. For grooving wear, a harder metal surface is preferable, under blasting erosion conditions, material removal is mainly determined by the matrix.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90276-R
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26335479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>004316489390276R</els_id><sourcerecordid>26335479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMUsRHQRTSbJZLIRpNQHFIWiuAyZ5I4TmUdNZgr-e6e2dOnqbr5zLudD6JySG0podksIZ5hmPL9S7FqRVGZ4eYAmNJcMp0LKQzTZI8foJMYvQghVIpug-QeYkASIPvamtZB0ZfLicWWCS3hiWpdU_rPCtgpd44cmsSb2iQ9dO2YwrE09mB7cKToqTR3hbHen6P1h_jZ7wovXx-fZ_QLbVKoeU8VcTrlTBRO5kc46kwpKVG7BgClUkWYcCmdlSUlZUsEEY84K65gQdhzApuhy27sK3fcAsdeNjxbq2rTQDVGnGWOCSzWCfAva0MUYoNSr4BsTfjQleuNMb4TojRCtmP5zppdj7GLXb6I1dRlGJT7us0xynqZixO62GIxb1x6CjtbDaM_5ALbXrvP___kFFLt_UQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26335479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wear resistance of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium cast iron re-evaluated</title><source>Backfile Package - Materials Science [YMS]</source><creator>Jinzhu, Liu ; Shizhuo, Li ; Yongfa, Man</creator><creatorcontrib>Jinzhu, Liu ; Shizhuo, Li ; Yongfa, Man</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of the wear resistances of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium (15-3) cast irons has been made under different testing conditions. Several kinds of wear tester were employed (reciprocating grooving tester, dry sand rubber wheel tester, single-pass pendulum impact grooving tester, and blasting erosion tester). The results show that whereas Ni-hard 4 seems to be more suitable to resist blasting erosion, high-chromium cast iron is better at resisting grooving wear, the ranking of materials changing with testing conditions. The measured wear resistance of the irons has been explained in terms of microstructure and hardness. Material removal occurred as a result of different mechanisms. For grooving wear, a harder metal surface is preferable, under blasting erosion conditions, material removal is mainly determined by the matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90276-R</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WEARAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Contact of materials. Friction. Wear ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology ; Metals. Metallurgy</subject><ispartof>Wear, 1993-06, Vol.166 (1), p.37-40</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004316489390276R$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3542,27898,27899,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3744225$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jinzhu, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shizhuo, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yongfa, Man</creatorcontrib><title>Wear resistance of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium cast iron re-evaluated</title><title>Wear</title><description>A comparison of the wear resistances of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium (15-3) cast irons has been made under different testing conditions. Several kinds of wear tester were employed (reciprocating grooving tester, dry sand rubber wheel tester, single-pass pendulum impact grooving tester, and blasting erosion tester). The results show that whereas Ni-hard 4 seems to be more suitable to resist blasting erosion, high-chromium cast iron is better at resisting grooving wear, the ranking of materials changing with testing conditions. The measured wear resistance of the irons has been explained in terms of microstructure and hardness. Material removal occurred as a result of different mechanisms. For grooving wear, a harder metal surface is preferable, under blasting erosion conditions, material removal is mainly determined by the matrix.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Contact of materials. Friction. Wear</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><issn>0043-1648</issn><issn>1873-2577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMUsRHQRTSbJZLIRpNQHFIWiuAyZ5I4TmUdNZgr-e6e2dOnqbr5zLudD6JySG0podksIZ5hmPL9S7FqRVGZ4eYAmNJcMp0LKQzTZI8foJMYvQghVIpug-QeYkASIPvamtZB0ZfLicWWCS3hiWpdU_rPCtgpd44cmsSb2iQ9dO2YwrE09mB7cKToqTR3hbHen6P1h_jZ7wovXx-fZ_QLbVKoeU8VcTrlTBRO5kc46kwpKVG7BgClUkWYcCmdlSUlZUsEEY84K65gQdhzApuhy27sK3fcAsdeNjxbq2rTQDVGnGWOCSzWCfAva0MUYoNSr4BsTfjQleuNMb4TojRCtmP5zppdj7GLXb6I1dRlGJT7us0xynqZixO62GIxb1x6CjtbDaM_5ALbXrvP___kFFLt_UQ</recordid><startdate>19930615</startdate><enddate>19930615</enddate><creator>Jinzhu, Liu</creator><creator>Shizhuo, Li</creator><creator>Yongfa, Man</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930615</creationdate><title>Wear resistance of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium cast iron re-evaluated</title><author>Jinzhu, Liu ; Shizhuo, Li ; Yongfa, Man</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Contact of materials. Friction. Wear</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jinzhu, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shizhuo, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yongfa, Man</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Wear</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jinzhu, Liu</au><au>Shizhuo, Li</au><au>Yongfa, Man</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wear resistance of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium cast iron re-evaluated</atitle><jtitle>Wear</jtitle><date>1993-06-15</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>37-40</pages><issn>0043-1648</issn><eissn>1873-2577</eissn><coden>WEARAH</coden><abstract>A comparison of the wear resistances of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium (15-3) cast irons has been made under different testing conditions. Several kinds of wear tester were employed (reciprocating grooving tester, dry sand rubber wheel tester, single-pass pendulum impact grooving tester, and blasting erosion tester). The results show that whereas Ni-hard 4 seems to be more suitable to resist blasting erosion, high-chromium cast iron is better at resisting grooving wear, the ranking of materials changing with testing conditions. The measured wear resistance of the irons has been explained in terms of microstructure and hardness. Material removal occurred as a result of different mechanisms. For grooving wear, a harder metal surface is preferable, under blasting erosion conditions, material removal is mainly determined by the matrix.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1648(93)90276-R</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1648
ispartof Wear, 1993-06, Vol.166 (1), p.37-40
issn 0043-1648
1873-2577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26335479
source Backfile Package - Materials Science [YMS]
subjects Applied sciences
Contact of materials. Friction. Wear
Exact sciences and technology
Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology
Metals. Metallurgy
title Wear resistance of Ni-hard 4 and high-chromium cast iron re-evaluated
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T23%3A27%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wear%20resistance%20of%20Ni-hard%204%20and%20high-chromium%20cast%20iron%20re-evaluated&rft.jtitle=Wear&rft.au=Jinzhu,%20Liu&rft.date=1993-06-15&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=37-40&rft.issn=0043-1648&rft.eissn=1873-2577&rft.coden=WEARAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1648(93)90276-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26335479%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-193d814d9b358a7dcda251098ceaeab9b264ebdc7f10ff153533dc5cd355c0433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26335479&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true