Loading…

Bowel preparation in MRI for detection of endometriosis: Comparison of the effect of an enema, no additional medication and intravenous butylscopolamine on image quality

•Butylscopolamine causes better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid, compared to Bisacodyl and no-medication.•Bisacodyl provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication.•In general there is no clinically relevant influence on delineation of other pelvic structure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of radiology 2022-04, Vol.149, p.110222-110222, Article 110222
Main Authors: Ciggaar, Isabeau A., Henneman, Onno D.F., Oei, Stanley A., Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L., Blikkendaal, Mathijs D., Bipat, Shandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913
container_end_page 110222
container_issue
container_start_page 110222
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 149
creator Ciggaar, Isabeau A.
Henneman, Onno D.F.
Oei, Stanley A.
Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L.
Blikkendaal, Mathijs D.
Bipat, Shandra
description •Butylscopolamine causes better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid, compared to Bisacodyl and no-medication.•Bisacodyl provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication.•In general there is no clinically relevant influence on delineation of other pelvic structures between protocols.•Bisacodyl causes bowel wall edema of the rectosigmoid in the majority of patients. To compare the effect of three different patient preparation strategies for reducing bowel motion on image quality in pelvic MRI. Retrospective study in which 95 consecutive patients undergoing pelvic MRI were subdivided based on preparation type for reduction of bowel motion: group 1 (N = 31) fasted 4 h and applied an enema (Bisacodyl 10 mg); group 2 (N = 32) received no medication; group 3 (N = 32) received intravenous butylscopolamine (Buscopan® 50 mg). Image quality was reviewed by visual assessment of delineation (3-point-scale) of pelvic structures: uterus, adnexa, bladder, rectum, sigmoid, uterosacral ligaments, round ligaments and small bowel. As secondary endpoint the presence of rectal wall edema was evaluated. Interobserver agreement was calculated, as well as relative diagnostic odds ratios (RDOR) for the protocols to provide an outcome in the best delineation category. Interobserver agreement proportions varied from 0.48 to 1.00. The rectum and sigmoid colon respectively have a 5.4 and 2.6 RDOR when butylscopolamine is applied compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.051; P = 0.008), and a 4.2 and 5.7 times higher RDOR with Bisacodyl preparation compared to no medical preparation (P = 0.006; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110222
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633857713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X22000729</els_id><sourcerecordid>2633857713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2L1TAUDaI4b0Z_gSBZurDPfDRNK7jQh6MDI4IouAtpcqt5tEknSUfeT_Jfmk5Hl24ScnPuPeeeg9AzSvaU0ObVcQ_HqO2eEcb2lJaTPUA72kpWScnkQ7QjkpGK1O33M3Se0pEQIuqOPUZnXDAqWd3t0O934ReMeI4w66izCx47jz99ucJDiNhCBnNXDAMGb8MEObqQXHqND2EqLS5tn_knYBiGgl5f2hc0TPol9gFra906Q494AuvMxqK9LUw56lvwYUm4X_JpTCbMYdST84BXJZP-Afhm0aPLpyfo0aDHBE_v7wv07fL918PH6vrzh6vD2-vKcNHlqhayF6JlAmjLpeTQa84aLaEBrSlloim1pqak7jtuDGtsC7U0bQ9mMNBRfoFebHPnGG4WSFlNLhkYR-2hCFWs4bwVUlJeoHyDmhhSijCoORbN8aQoUWtG6qjuMlJrRmrLqHQ9vydY-mLIv56_oRTAmw0AZc1bB1El48CbYl4sBisb3H8J_gBxVKa-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633857713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bowel preparation in MRI for detection of endometriosis: Comparison of the effect of an enema, no additional medication and intravenous butylscopolamine on image quality</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Ciggaar, Isabeau A. ; Henneman, Onno D.F. ; Oei, Stanley A. ; Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L. ; Blikkendaal, Mathijs D. ; Bipat, Shandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciggaar, Isabeau A. ; Henneman, Onno D.F. ; Oei, Stanley A. ; Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L. ; Blikkendaal, Mathijs D. ; Bipat, Shandra</creatorcontrib><description>•Butylscopolamine causes better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid, compared to Bisacodyl and no-medication.•Bisacodyl provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication.•In general there is no clinically relevant influence on delineation of other pelvic structures between protocols.•Bisacodyl causes bowel wall edema of the rectosigmoid in the majority of patients. To compare the effect of three different patient preparation strategies for reducing bowel motion on image quality in pelvic MRI. Retrospective study in which 95 consecutive patients undergoing pelvic MRI were subdivided based on preparation type for reduction of bowel motion: group 1 (N = 31) fasted 4 h and applied an enema (Bisacodyl 10 mg); group 2 (N = 32) received no medication; group 3 (N = 32) received intravenous butylscopolamine (Buscopan® 50 mg). Image quality was reviewed by visual assessment of delineation (3-point-scale) of pelvic structures: uterus, adnexa, bladder, rectum, sigmoid, uterosacral ligaments, round ligaments and small bowel. As secondary endpoint the presence of rectal wall edema was evaluated. Interobserver agreement was calculated, as well as relative diagnostic odds ratios (RDOR) for the protocols to provide an outcome in the best delineation category. Interobserver agreement proportions varied from 0.48 to 1.00. The rectum and sigmoid colon respectively have a 5.4 and 2.6 RDOR when butylscopolamine is applied compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.051; P = 0.008), and a 4.2 and 5.7 times higher RDOR with Bisacodyl preparation compared to no medical preparation (P = 0.006; P &lt; 0.01). Small bowel delineation was significantly better with butylscopolamine compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in delineation of the other structures between protocols. There is a significant higher chance of observing rectal wall edema with Bisacodyl compared to the other protocols (both P &lt; 0.001). Butylscopolamine provides better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid compared to Bisacodyl, which in turn, provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication. Moreover, Bisacodyl causes rectal wall edema in the majority of cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35217249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bowel Preparation ; Diagnostic imaging ; Endometriosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2022-04, Vol.149, p.110222-110222, Article 110222</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciggaar, Isabeau A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneman, Onno D.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oei, Stanley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blikkendaal, Mathijs D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bipat, Shandra</creatorcontrib><title>Bowel preparation in MRI for detection of endometriosis: Comparison of the effect of an enema, no additional medication and intravenous butylscopolamine on image quality</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•Butylscopolamine causes better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid, compared to Bisacodyl and no-medication.•Bisacodyl provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication.•In general there is no clinically relevant influence on delineation of other pelvic structures between protocols.•Bisacodyl causes bowel wall edema of the rectosigmoid in the majority of patients. To compare the effect of three different patient preparation strategies for reducing bowel motion on image quality in pelvic MRI. Retrospective study in which 95 consecutive patients undergoing pelvic MRI were subdivided based on preparation type for reduction of bowel motion: group 1 (N = 31) fasted 4 h and applied an enema (Bisacodyl 10 mg); group 2 (N = 32) received no medication; group 3 (N = 32) received intravenous butylscopolamine (Buscopan® 50 mg). Image quality was reviewed by visual assessment of delineation (3-point-scale) of pelvic structures: uterus, adnexa, bladder, rectum, sigmoid, uterosacral ligaments, round ligaments and small bowel. As secondary endpoint the presence of rectal wall edema was evaluated. Interobserver agreement was calculated, as well as relative diagnostic odds ratios (RDOR) for the protocols to provide an outcome in the best delineation category. Interobserver agreement proportions varied from 0.48 to 1.00. The rectum and sigmoid colon respectively have a 5.4 and 2.6 RDOR when butylscopolamine is applied compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.051; P = 0.008), and a 4.2 and 5.7 times higher RDOR with Bisacodyl preparation compared to no medical preparation (P = 0.006; P &lt; 0.01). Small bowel delineation was significantly better with butylscopolamine compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in delineation of the other structures between protocols. There is a significant higher chance of observing rectal wall edema with Bisacodyl compared to the other protocols (both P &lt; 0.001). Butylscopolamine provides better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid compared to Bisacodyl, which in turn, provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication. Moreover, Bisacodyl causes rectal wall edema in the majority of cases.</description><subject>Bowel Preparation</subject><subject>Diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU2L1TAUDaI4b0Z_gSBZurDPfDRNK7jQh6MDI4IouAtpcqt5tEknSUfeT_Jfmk5Hl24ScnPuPeeeg9AzSvaU0ObVcQ_HqO2eEcb2lJaTPUA72kpWScnkQ7QjkpGK1O33M3Se0pEQIuqOPUZnXDAqWd3t0O934ReMeI4w66izCx47jz99ucJDiNhCBnNXDAMGb8MEObqQXHqND2EqLS5tn_knYBiGgl5f2hc0TPol9gFra906Q494AuvMxqK9LUw56lvwYUm4X_JpTCbMYdST84BXJZP-Afhm0aPLpyfo0aDHBE_v7wv07fL918PH6vrzh6vD2-vKcNHlqhayF6JlAmjLpeTQa84aLaEBrSlloim1pqak7jtuDGtsC7U0bQ9mMNBRfoFebHPnGG4WSFlNLhkYR-2hCFWs4bwVUlJeoHyDmhhSijCoORbN8aQoUWtG6qjuMlJrRmrLqHQ9vydY-mLIv56_oRTAmw0AZc1bB1El48CbYl4sBisb3H8J_gBxVKa-</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Ciggaar, Isabeau A.</creator><creator>Henneman, Onno D.F.</creator><creator>Oei, Stanley A.</creator><creator>Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L.</creator><creator>Blikkendaal, Mathijs D.</creator><creator>Bipat, Shandra</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Bowel preparation in MRI for detection of endometriosis: Comparison of the effect of an enema, no additional medication and intravenous butylscopolamine on image quality</title><author>Ciggaar, Isabeau A. ; Henneman, Onno D.F. ; Oei, Stanley A. ; Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L. ; Blikkendaal, Mathijs D. ; Bipat, Shandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bowel Preparation</topic><topic>Diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciggaar, Isabeau A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneman, Onno D.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oei, Stanley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blikkendaal, Mathijs D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bipat, Shandra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciggaar, Isabeau A.</au><au>Henneman, Onno D.F.</au><au>Oei, Stanley A.</au><au>Vanhooymissen, Inge J.S.M.L.</au><au>Blikkendaal, Mathijs D.</au><au>Bipat, Shandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bowel preparation in MRI for detection of endometriosis: Comparison of the effect of an enema, no additional medication and intravenous butylscopolamine on image quality</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>149</volume><spage>110222</spage><epage>110222</epage><pages>110222-110222</pages><artnum>110222</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•Butylscopolamine causes better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid, compared to Bisacodyl and no-medication.•Bisacodyl provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication.•In general there is no clinically relevant influence on delineation of other pelvic structures between protocols.•Bisacodyl causes bowel wall edema of the rectosigmoid in the majority of patients. To compare the effect of three different patient preparation strategies for reducing bowel motion on image quality in pelvic MRI. Retrospective study in which 95 consecutive patients undergoing pelvic MRI were subdivided based on preparation type for reduction of bowel motion: group 1 (N = 31) fasted 4 h and applied an enema (Bisacodyl 10 mg); group 2 (N = 32) received no medication; group 3 (N = 32) received intravenous butylscopolamine (Buscopan® 50 mg). Image quality was reviewed by visual assessment of delineation (3-point-scale) of pelvic structures: uterus, adnexa, bladder, rectum, sigmoid, uterosacral ligaments, round ligaments and small bowel. As secondary endpoint the presence of rectal wall edema was evaluated. Interobserver agreement was calculated, as well as relative diagnostic odds ratios (RDOR) for the protocols to provide an outcome in the best delineation category. Interobserver agreement proportions varied from 0.48 to 1.00. The rectum and sigmoid colon respectively have a 5.4 and 2.6 RDOR when butylscopolamine is applied compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.051; P = 0.008), and a 4.2 and 5.7 times higher RDOR with Bisacodyl preparation compared to no medical preparation (P = 0.006; P &lt; 0.01). Small bowel delineation was significantly better with butylscopolamine compared to Bisacodyl (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in delineation of the other structures between protocols. There is a significant higher chance of observing rectal wall edema with Bisacodyl compared to the other protocols (both P &lt; 0.001). Butylscopolamine provides better delineation of the small bowel and rectosigmoid compared to Bisacodyl, which in turn, provides better delineation of the rectosigmoid compared to no medication. Moreover, Bisacodyl causes rectal wall edema in the majority of cases.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35217249</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110222</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2022-04, Vol.149, p.110222-110222, Article 110222
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633857713
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Bowel Preparation
Diagnostic imaging
Endometriosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Bowel preparation in MRI for detection of endometriosis: Comparison of the effect of an enema, no additional medication and intravenous butylscopolamine on image quality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A50%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bowel%20preparation%20in%20MRI%20for%20detection%20of%20endometriosis:%20Comparison%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20an%20enema,%20no%20additional%20medication%20and%20intravenous%20butylscopolamine%20on%20image%20quality&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Ciggaar,%20Isabeau%20A.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=149&rft.spage=110222&rft.epage=110222&rft.pages=110222-110222&rft.artnum=110222&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2633857713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-457b55825e183773eba326a7e6eaa1125673e64104b93cc26d8e47c8becfce913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633857713&rft_id=info:pmid/35217249&rfr_iscdi=true