Loading…

Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients

We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europace (London, England) England), 2022-09, Vol.24 (8), p.1240-1247
Main Authors: Szymanski, Tomasz, Ashton, Rachel, Sekelj, Sara, Petrungaro, Bruno, Pollock, Kevin G, Sandler, Belinda, Lister, Steven, Hill, Nathan R, Farooqui, Usman
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3
container_end_page 1247
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1240
container_title Europace (London, England)
container_volume 24
creator Szymanski, Tomasz
Ashton, Rachel
Sekelj, Sara
Petrungaro, Bruno
Pollock, Kevin G
Sandler, Belinda
Lister, Steven
Hill, Nathan R
Farooqui, Usman
description We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older in 2018/19, and had complete data for weight, height, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded within 1 year. Three screening scenarios were assessed: (i) opportunistic screening and diagnosis (standard care); (ii) standard care replaced by the use of the algorithm; and (iii) combined use of standard care and the algorithm. The analysis considered a 3-year time horizon, and the budget impact for the National Health Service (NHS) costs alone or with personal social services (PSS) costs. Scenario 1 would identify 79 410 new AF cases (detection gap reduced by 22%). Scenario 2 would identify 70 916 (gap reduced by 19%) and Scenario 3 would identify 99 267 new cases (gap reduction 27%). These rates translate into 2639 strokes being prevented in Scenario 1, 2357 in Scenario 2, and 3299 in Scenario 3. The 3-year NHS budget impact of Scenario 1 would be £45.3 million, £3.6 million (difference ‒92.0%) with Scenario 2, and £46.3 million (difference 2.2%) in Scenario 3, but for NHS plus PSS would be ‒£48.8 million, ‒£80.4 million (64.8%), and ‒£71.3 million (46.1%), respectively. Implementation of an AF risk prediction algorithm alongside standard opportunistic screening could close the AF detection gap and prevent strokes while substantially reducing NHS and PSS combined care costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/europace/euac016
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634514092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2634514092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMyGPLAE7rtN6BMSXVIkF5uhin1tDEgfbGVj42zG0Zbon3fs93T1Czjm74kyJaxyDH0BjFqAZrw7IlEtRFiVT5WHWTKlC8lJNyEmM74yxRankMZkIWZYVZ3xKvm9Hs8ZEXZdzEoUe2q_oIvWWAu1Ab1yPtEUIvevXFNq1Dy5tOpo8HQIal5mNW29ocPHjD0rBQUuta4JrW0jO9xQ6n9khuA7CF9UQkA55g32Kp-TIQhvxbDdn5O3h_vXuqVi9PD7f3awKLeY8FVKhEFYurQAUsmJmaQzoZf6So1BziU0jEUzTGM2EhUqDlQswXDHBKm1RzMjlNncI_nPEmOrORY35wh79GOuyEnPJ5zkwW9nWqoOPMaCtd5fXnNW_rdf71utd6xm52KWPTYfmH9jXLH4AYaiEoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2634514092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Oxford Open</source><creator>Szymanski, Tomasz ; Ashton, Rachel ; Sekelj, Sara ; Petrungaro, Bruno ; Pollock, Kevin G ; Sandler, Belinda ; Lister, Steven ; Hill, Nathan R ; Farooqui, Usman</creator><creatorcontrib>Szymanski, Tomasz ; Ashton, Rachel ; Sekelj, Sara ; Petrungaro, Bruno ; Pollock, Kevin G ; Sandler, Belinda ; Lister, Steven ; Hill, Nathan R ; Farooqui, Usman</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older in 2018/19, and had complete data for weight, height, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded within 1 year. Three screening scenarios were assessed: (i) opportunistic screening and diagnosis (standard care); (ii) standard care replaced by the use of the algorithm; and (iii) combined use of standard care and the algorithm. The analysis considered a 3-year time horizon, and the budget impact for the National Health Service (NHS) costs alone or with personal social services (PSS) costs. Scenario 1 would identify 79 410 new AF cases (detection gap reduced by 22%). Scenario 2 would identify 70 916 (gap reduced by 19%) and Scenario 3 would identify 99 267 new cases (gap reduction 27%). These rates translate into 2639 strokes being prevented in Scenario 1, 2357 in Scenario 2, and 3299 in Scenario 3. The 3-year NHS budget impact of Scenario 1 would be £45.3 million, £3.6 million (difference ‒92.0%) with Scenario 2, and £46.3 million (difference 2.2%) in Scenario 3, but for NHS plus PSS would be ‒£48.8 million, ‒£80.4 million (64.8%), and ‒£71.3 million (46.1%), respectively. Implementation of an AF risk prediction algorithm alongside standard opportunistic screening could close the AF detection gap and prevent strokes while substantially reducing NHS and PSS combined care costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35226101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2022-09, Vol.24 (8), p.1240-1247</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2022. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5298-0504</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szymanski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekelj, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrungaro, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Kevin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lister, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Nathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooqui, Usman</creatorcontrib><title>Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><description>We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older in 2018/19, and had complete data for weight, height, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded within 1 year. Three screening scenarios were assessed: (i) opportunistic screening and diagnosis (standard care); (ii) standard care replaced by the use of the algorithm; and (iii) combined use of standard care and the algorithm. The analysis considered a 3-year time horizon, and the budget impact for the National Health Service (NHS) costs alone or with personal social services (PSS) costs. Scenario 1 would identify 79 410 new AF cases (detection gap reduced by 22%). Scenario 2 would identify 70 916 (gap reduced by 19%) and Scenario 3 would identify 99 267 new cases (gap reduction 27%). These rates translate into 2639 strokes being prevented in Scenario 1, 2357 in Scenario 2, and 3299 in Scenario 3. The 3-year NHS budget impact of Scenario 1 would be £45.3 million, £3.6 million (difference ‒92.0%) with Scenario 2, and £46.3 million (difference 2.2%) in Scenario 3, but for NHS plus PSS would be ‒£48.8 million, ‒£80.4 million (64.8%), and ‒£71.3 million (46.1%), respectively. Implementation of an AF risk prediction algorithm alongside standard opportunistic screening could close the AF detection gap and prevent strokes while substantially reducing NHS and PSS combined care costs.</description><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMyGPLAE7rtN6BMSXVIkF5uhin1tDEgfbGVj42zG0Zbon3fs93T1Czjm74kyJaxyDH0BjFqAZrw7IlEtRFiVT5WHWTKlC8lJNyEmM74yxRankMZkIWZYVZ3xKvm9Hs8ZEXZdzEoUe2q_oIvWWAu1Ab1yPtEUIvevXFNq1Dy5tOpo8HQIal5mNW29ocPHjD0rBQUuta4JrW0jO9xQ6n9khuA7CF9UQkA55g32Kp-TIQhvxbDdn5O3h_vXuqVi9PD7f3awKLeY8FVKhEFYurQAUsmJmaQzoZf6So1BziU0jEUzTGM2EhUqDlQswXDHBKm1RzMjlNncI_nPEmOrORY35wh79GOuyEnPJ5zkwW9nWqoOPMaCtd5fXnNW_rdf71utd6xm52KWPTYfmH9jXLH4AYaiEoA</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Szymanski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Ashton, Rachel</creator><creator>Sekelj, Sara</creator><creator>Petrungaro, Bruno</creator><creator>Pollock, Kevin G</creator><creator>Sandler, Belinda</creator><creator>Lister, Steven</creator><creator>Hill, Nathan R</creator><creator>Farooqui, Usman</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-0504</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients</title><author>Szymanski, Tomasz ; Ashton, Rachel ; Sekelj, Sara ; Petrungaro, Bruno ; Pollock, Kevin G ; Sandler, Belinda ; Lister, Steven ; Hill, Nathan R ; Farooqui, Usman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szymanski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekelj, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrungaro, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Kevin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lister, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Nathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooqui, Usman</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szymanski, Tomasz</au><au>Ashton, Rachel</au><au>Sekelj, Sara</au><au>Petrungaro, Bruno</au><au>Pollock, Kevin G</au><au>Sandler, Belinda</au><au>Lister, Steven</au><au>Hill, Nathan R</au><au>Farooqui, Usman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1240</spage><epage>1247</epage><pages>1240-1247</pages><issn>1099-5129</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older in 2018/19, and had complete data for weight, height, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded within 1 year. Three screening scenarios were assessed: (i) opportunistic screening and diagnosis (standard care); (ii) standard care replaced by the use of the algorithm; and (iii) combined use of standard care and the algorithm. The analysis considered a 3-year time horizon, and the budget impact for the National Health Service (NHS) costs alone or with personal social services (PSS) costs. Scenario 1 would identify 79 410 new AF cases (detection gap reduced by 22%). Scenario 2 would identify 70 916 (gap reduced by 19%) and Scenario 3 would identify 99 267 new cases (gap reduction 27%). These rates translate into 2639 strokes being prevented in Scenario 1, 2357 in Scenario 2, and 3299 in Scenario 3. The 3-year NHS budget impact of Scenario 1 would be £45.3 million, £3.6 million (difference ‒92.0%) with Scenario 2, and £46.3 million (difference 2.2%) in Scenario 3, but for NHS plus PSS would be ‒£48.8 million, ‒£80.4 million (64.8%), and ‒£71.3 million (46.1%), respectively. Implementation of an AF risk prediction algorithm alongside standard opportunistic screening could close the AF detection gap and prevent strokes while substantially reducing NHS and PSS combined care costs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>35226101</pmid><doi>10.1093/europace/euac016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-0504</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-5129
ispartof Europace (London, England), 2022-09, Vol.24 (8), p.1240-1247
issn 1099-5129
1532-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634514092
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Oxford Journals Online; Oxford Open
title Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Budget%20impact%20analysis%20of%20a%20machine%20learning%20algorithm%20to%20predict%20high%20risk%20of%20atrial%20fibrillation%20among%20primary%20care%20patients&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Szymanski,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1240&rft.epage=1247&rft.pages=1240-1247&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euac016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2634514092%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-59e33f58f3ae3560d8ddac80921e3945ebb5eadbbdc03fa6caf57ad190306cfe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2634514092&rft_id=info:pmid/35226101&rfr_iscdi=true