Sexual reproduction is light‐limited as marsh grasses colonize maritime forest

• Published in: American journal of botany 2022-04, Vol.109 (4), p.514-525
• Main Authors: Kottler, Ezra J., Gedan, Keryn B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquatic plants; Climate Change; Colonization; Dieback; ecotone; Flowering; Forests; Genetic diversity; Grasses; high marsh; Interspecific relationships; intraspecific variation; maritime forest; marsh migration; Marshes; Meadows; Photosynthesis; Poaceae; Propagation; range edge; Reproduction; Reproduction (biology); Reproductive strategy; Sea level; sea‐level rise; Seeds; Sexual reproduction; Shading; Spartina; Species; Understory; Wetlands; Wildlife conservation
• ISSN: 0002-9122; 1537-2197
• DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1831

Climate change is driving abiotic shifts that can threaten the conservation of foundation species and the habitats they support. Directional range shifting is one mechanism of escape, but requires the successful colonization of habitats where interspecific interactions may differ from those to which a species has adapted. For plants with multiple reproductive strategies, these range‐edge interactions may alter the investment or allocation toward a given reproductive strategy. In this study, we quantified sexual reproduction of the clonal marsh grass Spartina patens across an inland colonization front into maritime forest being driven by sea‐level rise. We find that flowering is variable across S. patens meadows, but consistently reduced in low light conditions like those of the forest understory. Observational surveys of S. patens flowering at four sites in the Delmarva Peninsula agreed with the results of two experimental manipulations of light availability (shading experiment in S. patens‐dominated marsh and a forest dieback manipulation). These three approaches pinpointed light limitation as a principal control on S. patens flowering capacity, suggesting that light competition with taller upland species can suppress S. patens flowering along its upland migration front. Consequently, all propagation in shaded conditions must occur clonally or via seeds from the marsh, a reproductive restriction that could limit the potential for local adaptation and reduce genetic diversity. Future research is needed to determine whether the lack of flowering is the result of a trade‐off between sexual and clonal reproduction or results from insufficient photosynthetic products needed to achieve either reproductive method.