Which Measures From a Sustained Attention Task Best Predict ADHD Group Membership?

Difficulty with sustaining attention to a task is a hallmark of ADHD. It would be useful to know which measures of sustained attention best predict a diagnosis of ADHD. Participants were 129 children with a diagnosis of ADHD and 129 matched controls who completed the fixed Sustained Attention to Res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of attention disorders 2022-09, Vol.26 (11), p.1471-1482
Main Authors: Machida, Keitaro, Barry, Edwina, Mulligan, Aisling, Gill, Michael, Robertson, Ian H., Lewis, Frances C., Green, Benita, Kelly, Simon P, Bellgrove, Mark A., Johnson, Katherine A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Difficulty with sustaining attention to a task is a hallmark of ADHD. It would be useful to know which measures of sustained attention best predict a diagnosis of ADHD. Participants were 129 children with a diagnosis of ADHD and 129 matched controls who completed the fixed Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). The number of commission and omission errors, standard deviation of response time (SDRT), tau, fast and slow frequency variability, d-prime, and mu were able to successfully classify children with and without ADHD. The mean response time, criterion, and sigma were not able to classify participants. The best classifiers were d-prime (0.75 Area Under the Receiver Operated Characteristic), tau (.74), SDRT (0.74), omission errors (0.72), commission errors (0.71), and SFAUS (0.70). This list of the best classifier measures derived from the SART may prove useful for the planning of future studies.
ISSN:1087-0547
1557-1246
DOI:10.1177/10870547221081266