Loading…

Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation

In the kinematic dynamo problem a fluid motion is specified arbitrarily and the induction equation is solved for non-decaying magnetic fields; it forms part of the larger magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) dynamo problem in which the fluid flow is buoyancy-driven. Although somewhat restrictive, the kinematic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of fluid mechanics 1996-01, Vol.306, p.223-265
Main Authors: Sarson, Graeme R., Gubbins, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53
container_end_page 265
container_issue
container_start_page 223
container_title Journal of fluid mechanics
container_volume 306
creator Sarson, Graeme R.
Gubbins, David
description In the kinematic dynamo problem a fluid motion is specified arbitrarily and the induction equation is solved for non-decaying magnetic fields; it forms part of the larger magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) dynamo problem in which the fluid flow is buoyancy-driven. Although somewhat restrictive, the kinematic problem is important for two reasons: first, it suffers from numerical difficulties that are holding up progress on the MHD problem; secondly, for the geodynamo, it is capable of reproducing details of the observable magnetic field. It is more efficient to study these two aspects for the kinematic dynamo than for the full MHD dynamo. We explore solutions for a family of fluid flows in a sphere, first studied by Kumar & Roberts (1975), that is heuristically representative of convection in a rotating sphere such as the Earth's core. We guard against numerical difficulties by comparing our results with well-understood solutions from the axisymmetric (αω) limit of Braginskii (1964a) and with solutions of the adjoint problem, which must yield identical eigenvalues in an adequate numerical treatment. Previous work has found a range of steady dipolar solutions; here we extend these results and find solutions of other symmetries, notably oscillatory and quadrupolar fields. The surface magnetic fields, important for comparison with observations, have magnetic flux concentrated by downwelling flow. Roberts (1972) found that meridional circulation promoted stationary solutions of the αω-equations, preferred solutions being oscillatory when no such circulation was present. We find analogous results for the full three-dimensional problem, but note that in the latter case the ‘effective’ meridional circulation arising from the non-axisymmetric convection (a concept made precise in the asymptotic limit of Braginskii 1964a) must be considered. Thus stationary solutions are obtained even in the absence of ‘true’ meridional circulation, and the time-dependence can be controlled by the strength of the convection as well as by the meridional circulation. The preference for fields of dipole or quadrupole parity is largely controlled by the sign of the velocity: a reversal of velocity from a case favouring a dipole will favour quadrupole parity, and vice versa. For the comparison problem of Proctor (1977b) this symmetry is exact; for the physical problem the boundary conditions make a difference. The boundary effect is first removed by surrounding the dynamo region with a thick laye
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022112096001292
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26373277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022112096001292</cupid><sourcerecordid>26373277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAeyyQOwCftR2skSI8hAUIQosrUk8KYbEBjuV6N-TqhUbJFazuOeMri4hR4yeMsr02ROlnDPGaakoZbzkW2TExqrMtRrLbTJaxfkq3yV7Kb0PjKClHpH72VtEzK3r0CcXPLTZh_PYQe_qzC49dCFlNnTOQ482q5ZZ6mPw88y6psGIvneDEkM_CMEfkJ0G2oSHm7tPnieXs4vr_O7h6ubi_C6vRSH7vFIVtaIQiupGIJXjQuhSyNrSokCpNVMN48g0q8aKSrBVRTWABirQKqik2Ccn67-fMXwtMPWmc6nGtgWPYZEMV0ILrvUAsjVYx5BSxMZ8RtdBXBpGzWo482e4wTnePIdUQ9tE8LVLvyIvtSzVqkO-xlzq8fs3hvhhlBZaGnX1aG7V6-PTdPJipgMvNlWgq6KzczTvYRGHxdM_ZX4AMEGLzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26373277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation</title><source>Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)</source><creator>Sarson, Graeme R. ; Gubbins, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarson, Graeme R. ; Gubbins, David</creatorcontrib><description>In the kinematic dynamo problem a fluid motion is specified arbitrarily and the induction equation is solved for non-decaying magnetic fields; it forms part of the larger magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) dynamo problem in which the fluid flow is buoyancy-driven. Although somewhat restrictive, the kinematic problem is important for two reasons: first, it suffers from numerical difficulties that are holding up progress on the MHD problem; secondly, for the geodynamo, it is capable of reproducing details of the observable magnetic field. It is more efficient to study these two aspects for the kinematic dynamo than for the full MHD dynamo. We explore solutions for a family of fluid flows in a sphere, first studied by Kumar &amp; Roberts (1975), that is heuristically representative of convection in a rotating sphere such as the Earth's core. We guard against numerical difficulties by comparing our results with well-understood solutions from the axisymmetric (αω) limit of Braginskii (1964a) and with solutions of the adjoint problem, which must yield identical eigenvalues in an adequate numerical treatment. Previous work has found a range of steady dipolar solutions; here we extend these results and find solutions of other symmetries, notably oscillatory and quadrupolar fields. The surface magnetic fields, important for comparison with observations, have magnetic flux concentrated by downwelling flow. Roberts (1972) found that meridional circulation promoted stationary solutions of the αω-equations, preferred solutions being oscillatory when no such circulation was present. We find analogous results for the full three-dimensional problem, but note that in the latter case the ‘effective’ meridional circulation arising from the non-axisymmetric convection (a concept made precise in the asymptotic limit of Braginskii 1964a) must be considered. Thus stationary solutions are obtained even in the absence of ‘true’ meridional circulation, and the time-dependence can be controlled by the strength of the convection as well as by the meridional circulation. The preference for fields of dipole or quadrupole parity is largely controlled by the sign of the velocity: a reversal of velocity from a case favouring a dipole will favour quadrupole parity, and vice versa. For the comparison problem of Proctor (1977b) this symmetry is exact; for the physical problem the boundary conditions make a difference. The boundary effect is first removed by surrounding the dynamo region with a thick layer of quiescent conducting fluid, and then studied numerically by progressively reducing the thickness of this layer to zero. The insulating boundary contributes to the difficulty of obtaining dynamo action, and to the numerical difficulties encountered. The effect of an inner boundary on dynamo action is also considered, but found to be slight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022112096001292</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFLSA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Journal of fluid mechanics, 1996-01, Vol.306, p.223-265</ispartof><rights>1996 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022112096001292/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,55689</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2975965$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarson, Graeme R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubbins, David</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation</title><title>Journal of fluid mechanics</title><addtitle>J. Fluid Mech</addtitle><description>In the kinematic dynamo problem a fluid motion is specified arbitrarily and the induction equation is solved for non-decaying magnetic fields; it forms part of the larger magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) dynamo problem in which the fluid flow is buoyancy-driven. Although somewhat restrictive, the kinematic problem is important for two reasons: first, it suffers from numerical difficulties that are holding up progress on the MHD problem; secondly, for the geodynamo, it is capable of reproducing details of the observable magnetic field. It is more efficient to study these two aspects for the kinematic dynamo than for the full MHD dynamo. We explore solutions for a family of fluid flows in a sphere, first studied by Kumar &amp; Roberts (1975), that is heuristically representative of convection in a rotating sphere such as the Earth's core. We guard against numerical difficulties by comparing our results with well-understood solutions from the axisymmetric (αω) limit of Braginskii (1964a) and with solutions of the adjoint problem, which must yield identical eigenvalues in an adequate numerical treatment. Previous work has found a range of steady dipolar solutions; here we extend these results and find solutions of other symmetries, notably oscillatory and quadrupolar fields. The surface magnetic fields, important for comparison with observations, have magnetic flux concentrated by downwelling flow. Roberts (1972) found that meridional circulation promoted stationary solutions of the αω-equations, preferred solutions being oscillatory when no such circulation was present. We find analogous results for the full three-dimensional problem, but note that in the latter case the ‘effective’ meridional circulation arising from the non-axisymmetric convection (a concept made precise in the asymptotic limit of Braginskii 1964a) must be considered. Thus stationary solutions are obtained even in the absence of ‘true’ meridional circulation, and the time-dependence can be controlled by the strength of the convection as well as by the meridional circulation. The preference for fields of dipole or quadrupole parity is largely controlled by the sign of the velocity: a reversal of velocity from a case favouring a dipole will favour quadrupole parity, and vice versa. For the comparison problem of Proctor (1977b) this symmetry is exact; for the physical problem the boundary conditions make a difference. The boundary effect is first removed by surrounding the dynamo region with a thick layer of quiescent conducting fluid, and then studied numerically by progressively reducing the thickness of this layer to zero. The insulating boundary contributes to the difficulty of obtaining dynamo action, and to the numerical difficulties encountered. The effect of an inner boundary on dynamo action is also considered, but found to be slight.</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>0022-1120</issn><issn>1469-7645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAeyyQOwCftR2skSI8hAUIQosrUk8KYbEBjuV6N-TqhUbJFazuOeMri4hR4yeMsr02ROlnDPGaakoZbzkW2TExqrMtRrLbTJaxfkq3yV7Kb0PjKClHpH72VtEzK3r0CcXPLTZh_PYQe_qzC49dCFlNnTOQ482q5ZZ6mPw88y6psGIvneDEkM_CMEfkJ0G2oSHm7tPnieXs4vr_O7h6ubi_C6vRSH7vFIVtaIQiupGIJXjQuhSyNrSokCpNVMN48g0q8aKSrBVRTWABirQKqik2Ccn67-fMXwtMPWmc6nGtgWPYZEMV0ILrvUAsjVYx5BSxMZ8RtdBXBpGzWo482e4wTnePIdUQ9tE8LVLvyIvtSzVqkO-xlzq8fs3hvhhlBZaGnX1aG7V6-PTdPJipgMvNlWgq6KzczTvYRGHxdM_ZX4AMEGLzQ</recordid><startdate>19960110</startdate><enddate>19960110</enddate><creator>Sarson, Graeme R.</creator><creator>Gubbins, David</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960110</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation</title><author>Sarson, Graeme R. ; Gubbins, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarson, Graeme R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubbins, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarson, Graeme R.</au><au>Gubbins, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Fluid Mech</addtitle><date>1996-01-10</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>306</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>223-265</pages><issn>0022-1120</issn><eissn>1469-7645</eissn><coden>JFLSA7</coden><abstract>In the kinematic dynamo problem a fluid motion is specified arbitrarily and the induction equation is solved for non-decaying magnetic fields; it forms part of the larger magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) dynamo problem in which the fluid flow is buoyancy-driven. Although somewhat restrictive, the kinematic problem is important for two reasons: first, it suffers from numerical difficulties that are holding up progress on the MHD problem; secondly, for the geodynamo, it is capable of reproducing details of the observable magnetic field. It is more efficient to study these two aspects for the kinematic dynamo than for the full MHD dynamo. We explore solutions for a family of fluid flows in a sphere, first studied by Kumar &amp; Roberts (1975), that is heuristically representative of convection in a rotating sphere such as the Earth's core. We guard against numerical difficulties by comparing our results with well-understood solutions from the axisymmetric (αω) limit of Braginskii (1964a) and with solutions of the adjoint problem, which must yield identical eigenvalues in an adequate numerical treatment. Previous work has found a range of steady dipolar solutions; here we extend these results and find solutions of other symmetries, notably oscillatory and quadrupolar fields. The surface magnetic fields, important for comparison with observations, have magnetic flux concentrated by downwelling flow. Roberts (1972) found that meridional circulation promoted stationary solutions of the αω-equations, preferred solutions being oscillatory when no such circulation was present. We find analogous results for the full three-dimensional problem, but note that in the latter case the ‘effective’ meridional circulation arising from the non-axisymmetric convection (a concept made precise in the asymptotic limit of Braginskii 1964a) must be considered. Thus stationary solutions are obtained even in the absence of ‘true’ meridional circulation, and the time-dependence can be controlled by the strength of the convection as well as by the meridional circulation. The preference for fields of dipole or quadrupole parity is largely controlled by the sign of the velocity: a reversal of velocity from a case favouring a dipole will favour quadrupole parity, and vice versa. For the comparison problem of Proctor (1977b) this symmetry is exact; for the physical problem the boundary conditions make a difference. The boundary effect is first removed by surrounding the dynamo region with a thick layer of quiescent conducting fluid, and then studied numerically by progressively reducing the thickness of this layer to zero. The insulating boundary contributes to the difficulty of obtaining dynamo action, and to the numerical difficulties encountered. The effect of an inner boundary on dynamo action is also considered, but found to be slight.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022112096001292</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1120
ispartof Journal of fluid mechanics, 1996-01, Vol.306, p.223-265
issn 0022-1120
1469-7645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26373277
source Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)
subjects Exact sciences and technology
Fluid dynamics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics
Physics
title Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A30%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20kinematic%20dynamos%20dominated%20by%20strong%20differential%20rotation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluid%20mechanics&rft.au=Sarson,%20Graeme%20R.&rft.date=1996-01-10&rft.volume=306&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=223-265&rft.issn=0022-1120&rft.eissn=1469-7645&rft.coden=JFLSA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022112096001292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26373277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-b6b0d383607f3e054837935cd088e57716f12e171b4605adbb07aa7a03ed6ab53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26373277&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022112096001292&rfr_iscdi=true