The better, the choosier: A meta‐analysis on interindividual variation of male mate choice

• Published in: Ecology letters 2022-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1305-1322
• Main Authors: Pollo, Pietro, Nakagawa, Shinichi, Kasumovic, Michael M., Isvaran, Kavita
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal species; Animals; Body mass; Design of experiments; differential resource allocation; Empirical analysis; Experimental design; Female; Females; interindividual variation; Male; male mate choice; male mate preferences; Males; mate availability; Mate selection; Mathematical analysis; Mating Preference, Animal; Meta-analysis; Phenotype; Phenotypes; prudent choice; Reproduction; Sexual Behavior, Animal
• ISSN: 1461-023X; 1461-0248
• DOI: 10.1111/ele.13981

Male mate choice occurs in several animal species, but we know little about the factors that influence the expression of this behaviour. Males vary in their capacity to acquire mates (i.e. male quality), which could be crucial to male mate choice expression but it is often overlooked. Using a meta‐analytical approach, we explore interindividual variation in the expression of male mate choice by comparing the mating investment of males of different qualities and phenotypes to high‐ and low‐quality females. We used two datasets that together contained information from 60 empirical studies, comprising 52 species. We found that males of all qualities and phenotypes prefer high‐quality females, but differ in the strength of such preference. High‐ and medium‐quality males are choosier than low‐quality males. Similarly, males that are larger or in greater body condition are choosier than their counterparts. In contrast, male body mass and age are not associated with changes in male mate choice. We also show that experimental design may influence our understanding of male mating investment patterns, which may limit the generalisation of our findings. Nonetheless, we argue that male quality may be an important feature in the expression of male mate choice. Using a meta‐analytical approach, we explore interindividual variation in the expression of male mate choice by comparing the mating investment of males of different qualities and phenotypes to high‐ and low‐quality females. We found that males of all qualities and phenotypes prefer high‐quality females, but differ in the strength of such preference: high‐ and medium‐quality males are choosier than low‐quality males. Similarly, males that are larger or in greater body condition are choosier than their counterparts.