A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan

• Published in: The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075
• Main Authors: Takae, Seido, Kato, Keiichi, Watanabe, Chie, Nara, Kazuko, Koizumi, Tomoe, Kawai, Kiyotaka, Ota, Kuniaki, Yumura, Yasushi, Yabuuchi, Akiko, Kuwahara, Akira, Furui, Tatsuro, Takai, Yasushi, Irahara, Minoru, Suzuki, Nao
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast cancer; cancer survivor; Cryopreservation; Female; Fertility; Fertility Preservation; Gynecology; Humans; Japan; Obstetrics; oncofertility; oocyte cryopreservation; Oocytes; Oocytes - physiology; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; Ovaries; Patients; Pregnancy; Reproductive technologies; Reproductive technology; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1341-8076; 1447-0756
• DOI: 10.1111/jog.15199

Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. Results Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. Conclusions Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.