Validity of the ActivPAL monitor to distinguish postures: A systematic review

• Published in: Gait & posture 2022-05, Vol.94, p.107-113
• Main Authors: O’Brien, Myles W., Wu, Yanlin, Petterson, Jennifer L., Bray, Nick W., Kimmerly, Derek S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accelerometry - methods; Adult; Humans; Inclinometer; Lying time; Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods; Posture; Reproducibility of Results; Sedentary Behavior; Sedentary time; Sitting time; Thigh-worn accelerometry; Torso
• ISSN: 0966-6362; 1879-2219
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.03.002

Posture has been recently integrated into activity guidelines, advising people to limit their sedentary time and break up sedentary postures with standing/stepping as much as possible. The thigh-worn activPAL is a frequently used objective measure of posture, but its validity has only been investigated by individual studies and has not been systematically reviewed. Can the activPAL accurately characterize different postures? A rigorous systematic review protocol was conducted, including multiple study screeners and determiners of study quality. To be included, validation studies had to examine the accuracy of an activPAL posture outcome relative to a criterion measure (e.g., direct observation) in adults (>18 years). Citations were not restricted to language or date of publication. Sources were searched on May 16, 2021 and included Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. The study was pre-registered in Prospero (ID# CRD42021248240). Study quality was determined using a modified Hagströmer Bowles checklist. The results are presented narratively. Twenty-four studies (18 semi-structured laboratory arms, 8 uncontrolled protocol arms; 476 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Some studies (5/24) incorporated dual-monitor (trunk: 4/5; shin: 1/5) configurations. While heterogenous statistical procedures were implemented, most studies (n = 22/24) demonstrated a high validity (e.g., percent agreement >90%, no fixed bias, etc.) of the activPAL to measure sedentary and/or upright postures across semi-structured (17/18 arms) and uncontrolled study designs (7/8 arms). Specific experimental protocol factors (i.e., seat height, fidgeting, non-direct observation criterion comparator) likely explain the divergent reports that observed valid versus invalid findings. The study quality was 11.3 (standard deviation: 2.3) out of 19. Despite heterogeneous methodological and statistical approaches, the included studies generally provide supporting evidence that the activPAL can accurately distinguish between sedentary and standing postures. Multiple activPAL monitor configurations (e.g., thigh and torso) are needed to better characterize sitting versus lying postures. •The activPAL is a commonly used device to characterize postures.•We reviewed studies that examined the ability of the activPAL to measure posture.•Most (92%) studies observe high criterion validity, regardless of study protocol.•Dual placement of monitors (thigh and torso) provide more det