Analysis of the impact of badger culling on bovine tuberculosis in cattle in the high‐risk area of England, 2009–2020

Background Since 2013, badger culling has been part of the UK Government's strategy for controlling bovine tuberculosis (bTB) within a high‐risk area (HRA) in England. Government surveillance data now enables an examination of bTB herd incidence and prevalence, its headline indicators, within a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary record 2022-03, Vol.190 (6), p.e1384-n/a
Main Authors: Langton, Thomas E. S., Jones, Mark W., McGill, Iain
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Bayes Theorem
Cattle
Cattle Diseases
England - epidemiology
Incidence
Mustelidae
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Bovine - epidemiology
Tuberculosis, Bovine - prevention & control
Veterinary medicine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Since 2013, badger culling has been part of the UK Government's strategy for controlling bovine tuberculosis (bTB) within a high‐risk area (HRA) in England. Government surveillance data now enables an examination of bTB herd incidence and prevalence, its headline indicators, within and outside cull areas over the period 2009–2020. Methods Analysis compared herd incidence and prevalence data from within and outside badger culling areas. A range of models (GLMs, GLMMs, GAMs and GAMMs) were used to analyse incidence and prevalence in culled and unculled areas using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Change in incidence across ten county areas within the HRA for the period 2010–2020 was also compared. Results Analyses based on Defra published data using a variety of statistical methodologies did not suggest that badger culling affected herd bTB incidence or prevalence over the study period. In 9 of 10 counties, bTB incidence peaked and began to fall before badger culling commenced. Limitations There are limitations around the data available on culling location, temporal information and other confounding factors. As such, further analysis of any future datasets that may be released on bTB levels in areas where badger culling has been implemented is warranted. Conclusion This examination of government data obtained over a wide area and a long time period failed to identify a meaningful effect of badger culling on bTB in English cattle herds. These findings may have implications for the use of badger culling in current and future bTB control policy.
ISSN:0042-4900
2042-7670
DOI:10.1002/vetr.1384