Loading…
Evaluation of the stability of treatment with Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander and fixed orthodontics through counterpart analysis: A longitudinal follow‐up study
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment with a Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander (Stage I), followed by fixed appliances (Stage II) and follow‐up for an average of 4 years after Stage II, on dentoskeletal facial structures. Methods This study involved...
Saved in:
Published in: | Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.27-36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment with a Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander (Stage I), followed by fixed appliances (Stage II) and follow‐up for an average of 4 years after Stage II, on dentoskeletal facial structures.
Methods
This study involved 50 adolescents with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion associated with mandibular retrognathism: Treated Group (TG‐25) and Control Group (CG‐25). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken: T1, immediately before Stage I (TG) or at the beginning of the follow‐up period (CG); T2, at the end of Stage I (TG) or the follow‐up period (CG); T3, at the end of Stage II (TG); and T4, on average, 4 years after Stage II (TG). Enlow's counterpart analysis and some cephalometric measurements were evaluated. Parametric and non‐parametric tests were used (P ≤ 0.05).
Results
The ramus alignment variables (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1601-6335 1601-6343 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ocr.12574 |