Loading…

Evaluation of the stability of treatment with Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander and fixed orthodontics through counterpart analysis: A longitudinal follow‐up study

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment with a Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander (Stage I), followed by fixed appliances (Stage II) and follow‐up for an average of 4 years after Stage II, on dentoskeletal facial structures. Methods This study involved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.27-36
Main Authors: Arruda Aidar, Luís Antônio, Marchi, Luiz Carlos, Fuerte, Silvia, Yamashita, Hélio K., Dominguez, Gladys Cristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment with a Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander (Stage I), followed by fixed appliances (Stage II) and follow‐up for an average of 4 years after Stage II, on dentoskeletal facial structures. Methods This study involved 50 adolescents with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion associated with mandibular retrognathism: Treated Group (TG‐25) and Control Group (CG‐25). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken: T1, immediately before Stage I (TG) or at the beginning of the follow‐up period (CG); T2, at the end of Stage I (TG) or the follow‐up period (CG); T3, at the end of Stage II (TG); and T4, on average, 4 years after Stage II (TG). Enlow's counterpart analysis and some cephalometric measurements were evaluated. Parametric and non‐parametric tests were used (P ≤ 0.05). Results The ramus alignment variables (P 
ISSN:1601-6335
1601-6343
DOI:10.1111/ocr.12574