Pre-diagnosis meat intake and cooking method and ovarian cancer survival: results from the Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up Study (OOPS)

Objectives : The relationships between pre-diagnosis meat intake and ovarian cancer (OC) survival were limited and controversial. To date, no study has taken account of cooking methods. Thus, we aimed to firstly clarify these associations based on the Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up Study. Methods : This p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food & function 2022-04, Vol.13 (8), p.4653-4663
Main Authors: Wei, Yi-Fan, Sun, Ming-Li, Wen, Zhao-Yan, Liu, Fang-Hua, Liu, Ya-Shu, Yan, Shi, Qin, Xue, Gao, Song, Li, Xiu-Qin, Zhao, Yu-Hong, Gong, Ting-Ting, Wu, Qi-Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Cancer
Confidence intervals
Cooking
Cooking - methods
Diagnosis
Diet
Female
Fish
Fishes
Follow-Up Studies
Food intake
Humans
Meat
Medical records
Ovarian cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Seafood
Statistical models
Survival
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives : The relationships between pre-diagnosis meat intake and ovarian cancer (OC) survival were limited and controversial. To date, no study has taken account of cooking methods. Thus, we aimed to firstly clarify these associations based on the Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up Study. Methods : This prospective cohort study, including 853 OC patients between 2015 and 2020, was conducted to examine the aforementioned associations. All women completed a food frequency questionnaire. Deaths were ascertained up to March 31, 2021 via medical records and active follow-up. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results : During the median follow-up of 37.17 months, 130 women died. Pre-diagnosis fish and seafood intake was associated with better survival (HR T 3 vs. T 1 = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.82, p trend
ISSN:2042-6496
2042-650X
2042-650X
DOI:10.1039/d1fo03825g