Loading…

Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression

In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.613-638
Main Authors: Forstinger, Marlene, Grüner, Markus, Ansorge, Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703
cites
container_end_page 638
container_issue 6
container_start_page 613
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 48
creator Forstinger, Marlene
Grüner, Markus
Ansorge, Ulrich
description In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2). Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xhp0001001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2648902985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2673376392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvChR-ALHFBRQF_xnZvZYGCVMGhWzhaTjLZuMomwR9A_z1etoDEAWmk0fh99Go8L0JPKHlJCVevfgwLIYSWuodW1HBTUabUfbQixNQVlYwfoeMYb8ie0vIhOuKSa6OIWiG4niKAn7Y4DYC_DD4Bfg0unOGPsHXJfwN8VcZ2wOtQtOAdvsi-A_zZx-xGfJ4STMnPE94MYc7bAW_mpXozf5_wVV6WADEW8RF60LsxwuO7foKu373drN9Xl58uPqzPLyvHa56qlneq5UQYxVSveylUJ4yQVHClGmGaRpRHx1mRiWYdqWslJRda9MCa8h9-gp4ffJcwf80Qk9352MI4ugnmHC2rhTaEGS0L-uwf9GbOYSrbFUpxrmpu2P8pSZhm4pfX6YFqwxxjgN4uwe9cuLWU2H1E9m9EBX56Z5mbHXR_0N-ZFODFAXCLs0u8bV1Ivh0htjmEcuy9mRXa1ramnP8EI-2Ycw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650282485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Forstinger, Marlene ; Grüner, Markus ; Ansorge, Ulrich</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Forstinger, Marlene ; Grüner, Markus ; Ansorge, Ulrich ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2). Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35389707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Cues ; Female ; Goal Orientation ; Human ; Humans ; Ignorance ; Male ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Reaction Time ; Visual Attention ; Visual Perception ; Visual Search</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.613-638</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2421-9942 ; 0000-0002-1100-3317 ; 0000-0002-0869-4081</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35389707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Forstinger, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grüner, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansorge, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2). Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Visual Attention</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Search</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvChR-ALHFBRQF_xnZvZYGCVMGhWzhaTjLZuMomwR9A_z1etoDEAWmk0fh99Go8L0JPKHlJCVevfgwLIYSWuodW1HBTUabUfbQixNQVlYwfoeMYb8ie0vIhOuKSa6OIWiG4niKAn7Y4DYC_DD4Bfg0unOGPsHXJfwN8VcZ2wOtQtOAdvsi-A_zZx-xGfJ4STMnPE94MYc7bAW_mpXozf5_wVV6WADEW8RF60LsxwuO7foKu373drN9Xl58uPqzPLyvHa56qlneq5UQYxVSveylUJ4yQVHClGmGaRpRHx1mRiWYdqWslJRda9MCa8h9-gp4ffJcwf80Qk9352MI4ugnmHC2rhTaEGS0L-uwf9GbOYSrbFUpxrmpu2P8pSZhm4pfX6YFqwxxjgN4uwe9cuLWU2H1E9m9EBX56Z5mbHXR_0N-ZFODFAXCLs0u8bV1Ivh0htjmEcuy9mRXa1ramnP8EI-2Ycw</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Forstinger, Marlene</creator><creator>Grüner, Markus</creator><creator>Ansorge, Ulrich</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-9942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-3317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-4081</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</title><author>Forstinger, Marlene ; Grüner, Markus ; Ansorge, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Visual Attention</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Search</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forstinger, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grüner, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansorge, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forstinger, Marlene</au><au>Grüner, Markus</au><au>Ansorge, Ulrich</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>638</epage><pages>613-638</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><abstract>In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2). Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35389707</pmid><doi>10.1037/xhp0001001</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-9942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-3317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-4081</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.613-638
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2648902985
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); PsycARTICLES
subjects Attention
Cues
Female
Goal Orientation
Human
Humans
Ignorance
Male
Photic Stimulation - methods
Reaction Time
Visual Attention
Visual Perception
Visual Search
title Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A30%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unseeing%20the%20White%20Bear:%20Negative%20Search%20Criteria%20Guide%20Visual%20Attention%20Through%20Top-Down%20Suppression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Forstinger,%20Marlene&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=638&rft.pages=613-638&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xhp0001001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2673376392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650282485&rft_id=info:pmid/35389707&rfr_iscdi=true