Loading…
Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression
In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.613-638 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 638 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Forstinger, Marlene Grüner, Markus Ansorge, Ulrich |
description | In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2).
Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xhp0001001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2648902985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2673376392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvChR-ALHFBRQF_xnZvZYGCVMGhWzhaTjLZuMomwR9A_z1etoDEAWmk0fh99Go8L0JPKHlJCVevfgwLIYSWuodW1HBTUabUfbQixNQVlYwfoeMYb8ie0vIhOuKSa6OIWiG4niKAn7Y4DYC_DD4Bfg0unOGPsHXJfwN8VcZ2wOtQtOAdvsi-A_zZx-xGfJ4STMnPE94MYc7bAW_mpXozf5_wVV6WADEW8RF60LsxwuO7foKu373drN9Xl58uPqzPLyvHa56qlneq5UQYxVSveylUJ4yQVHClGmGaRpRHx1mRiWYdqWslJRda9MCa8h9-gp4ffJcwf80Qk9352MI4ugnmHC2rhTaEGS0L-uwf9GbOYSrbFUpxrmpu2P8pSZhm4pfX6YFqwxxjgN4uwe9cuLWU2H1E9m9EBX56Z5mbHXR_0N-ZFODFAXCLs0u8bV1Ivh0htjmEcuy9mRXa1ramnP8EI-2Ycw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650282485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Forstinger, Marlene ; Grüner, Markus ; Ansorge, Ulrich</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Forstinger, Marlene ; Grüner, Markus ; Ansorge, Ulrich ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2).
Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35389707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Cues ; Female ; Goal Orientation ; Human ; Humans ; Ignorance ; Male ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Reaction Time ; Visual Attention ; Visual Perception ; Visual Search</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.613-638</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2421-9942 ; 0000-0002-1100-3317 ; 0000-0002-0869-4081</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35389707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Forstinger, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grüner, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansorge, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2).
Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Visual Attention</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Search</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvChR-ALHFBRQF_xnZvZYGCVMGhWzhaTjLZuMomwR9A_z1etoDEAWmk0fh99Go8L0JPKHlJCVevfgwLIYSWuodW1HBTUabUfbQixNQVlYwfoeMYb8ie0vIhOuKSa6OIWiG4niKAn7Y4DYC_DD4Bfg0unOGPsHXJfwN8VcZ2wOtQtOAdvsi-A_zZx-xGfJ4STMnPE94MYc7bAW_mpXozf5_wVV6WADEW8RF60LsxwuO7foKu373drN9Xl58uPqzPLyvHa56qlneq5UQYxVSveylUJ4yQVHClGmGaRpRHx1mRiWYdqWslJRda9MCa8h9-gp4ffJcwf80Qk9352MI4ugnmHC2rhTaEGS0L-uwf9GbOYSrbFUpxrmpu2P8pSZhm4pfX6YFqwxxjgN4uwe9cuLWU2H1E9m9EBX56Z5mbHXR_0N-ZFODFAXCLs0u8bV1Ivh0htjmEcuy9mRXa1ramnP8EI-2Ycw</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Forstinger, Marlene</creator><creator>Grüner, Markus</creator><creator>Ansorge, Ulrich</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-9942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-3317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-4081</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</title><author>Forstinger, Marlene ; Grüner, Markus ; Ansorge, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Visual Attention</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Search</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forstinger, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grüner, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansorge, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forstinger, Marlene</au><au>Grüner, Markus</au><au>Ansorge, Ulrich</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>638</epage><pages>613-638</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><abstract>In three spatial cueing experiments, we investigated whether a negative search criterion (i.e., a task-relevant feature that negatively defines the target) can guide visual attention in a top-down manner. Our participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (e.g., red if the target was a nonred horizontal bar). Before the target, a peripheral singleton cue was shown at the target position (valid condition) or a nontarget position (invalid condition). We found slower reaction times in valid than invalid trials only with singleton cues matching the negative feature. Importantly, we ruled out that participants searched for target-associated features instead of suppressing the negative feature (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that suppression of cues with a negative feature was stronger than mere ignorance of singleton cues with a task-irrelevant feature. Finally, cue-target intervals of 60 ms and 150 ms elicited the same suppression effects for cues matching the negative feature. These findings suggest that the usage of a negative search criterion elicited feature-selective proactive suppression (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, our results provide first evidence of top-down attentional suppression dependent on current task goals as a strategy operating in parallel to the goal-directed search for target-defining features (Experiment 2).
Public Significance StatementPrevious research has indicated that even if features should be ignored, the to-be-ignored features nevertheless capture attention. However, we showed that if participants searched for a target defined by a negative feature (i.e., the target was a nonred horizontal bar), the negative feature (here: the color red) was actively suppressed during attentional guidance. Our results extend the knowledge of attentional guidance by showing selective suppression of task-relevant features that negatively define the target.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35389707</pmid><doi>10.1037/xhp0001001</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-9942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-3317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-4081</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.613-638 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2648902985 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Attention Cues Female Goal Orientation Human Humans Ignorance Male Photic Stimulation - methods Reaction Time Visual Attention Visual Perception Visual Search |
title | Unseeing the White Bear: Negative Search Criteria Guide Visual Attention Through Top-Down Suppression |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A30%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unseeing%20the%20White%20Bear:%20Negative%20Search%20Criteria%20Guide%20Visual%20Attention%20Through%20Top-Down%20Suppression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Forstinger,%20Marlene&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=638&rft.pages=613-638&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xhp0001001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2673376392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-c3d7c3049727f8f547d494514377b49bb48f5a32727082d0667553484fe2b9703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650282485&rft_id=info:pmid/35389707&rfr_iscdi=true |