Phylogenetic Diversity Rankings in the Face of Extinctions: The Robustness of the Fair Proportion Index

Abstract Planning for the protection of species often involves difficult choices about which species to prioritize, given constrained resources. One way of prioritizing species is to consider their “evolutionary distinctiveness,” (ED) that is, their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogenetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Systematic biology 2023-06, Vol.72 (3), p.606-615
Main Authors: Fischer, Mareike, Francis, Andrew, Wicke, Kristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Benchmarking
Biodiversity
Biological Evolution
Conservation of Natural Resources
Extinction, Biological
Phylogeny
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Planning for the protection of species often involves difficult choices about which species to prioritize, given constrained resources. One way of prioritizing species is to consider their “evolutionary distinctiveness,” (ED) that is, their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogenetic tree. Several evolutionary isolation metrics or phylogenetic diversity indices have been introduced in the literature, among them the so-called Fair Proportion (FP) index (also known as the ED score). This index apportions the total diversity of a tree among all leaves, thereby providing a simple prioritization criterion for conservation. Here, we focus on the prioritization order obtained from the FP index and analyze the effects of species extinction on this ranking. More precisely, we analyze the extent to which the ranking order may change when some species go extinct and the FP index is recomputed for the remaining taxa. We show that for each phylogenetic tree, there are edge lengths such that the extinction of one leaf per cherry completely reverses the ranking. Moreover, we show that even if only the lowest-ranked species goes extinct, the ranking order may drastically change. We end by analyzing the effects of these two extinction scenarios (extinction of the lowest-ranked species and extinction of one leaf per cherry) for a collection of empirical and simulated trees. In both cases, we can observe significant changes in the prioritization orders, highlighting the empirical relevance of our theoretical findings. [Biodiversity conservation; Fair Proportion index; phylogenetic diversity; species prioritization.]
ISSN:1063-5157
1076-836X
DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syac030