Participation in Cost-offset Community Supported Agriculture by Low-income Households in the U.S. is Associated with Community Characteristics and Operational Practices

• Published in: Public health nutrition 2022-04, p.1-25
• Main Authors: Hanson, Karla L, Xu, Lynn, Marshall, Grace A, Sitaker, Marilyn, Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie B, Kolodinsky, Jane, Bennett, April, Carriker, Salem, Smith, Diane, Ammerman, Alice S, Seguin-Fowler, Rebecca A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1475-2727
• DOI: 10.1017/S1368980022000908

OBJECTIVESubsidized or cost-offset community supported agriculture (CO-CSA) connects farms directly to low-income households and can improve fruit and vegetable intake. This analysis identifies factors associated with participation in CO-CSA.DESIGNFarm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK) provided a half-price, summer CO-CSA plus healthy eating classes to low-income households with children. Community characteristics (population, socio-demographics, health statistics) and CO-CSA operational practices (share sizes, pick-up sites, payment options, produce selection) are described and associations with participation levels examined.SETTINGTen communities in New York (NY), North Carolina (NC), Vermont, and Washington states in USA.PARTICIPANTSCaregiver-child dyads enrolled in spring 2016 or 2017.RESULTSResidents of micropolitan communities had more education and less poverty than in small towns. The one rural location (NC2) had the fewest college graduates (10%) and most poverty (23%), and poor health statistics. Most F3HK participants were white, except in NC where 45.2% were African American. CO-CSA participation varied significantly across communities from 33% (NC2) to 89% (NY1) of weeks picked-up. Most CO-CSAs offered multiple share sizes (69.2%) and participation was higher than when not offered (76.8% vs. 57.7% of weeks); whereas 53.8% offered a community pick-up location, and participation in these communities was lower than elsewhere (64.7% vs. 78.2% of weeks).CONCLUSIONCO-CSAs should consider offering choice of share size and innovate to address potential barriers such as rural location and limited education and income among residents. Future research is needed to better understand barriers to participation, particularly among participants utilizing community pick-up locations.