Loading…
Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis
The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucoco...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dermatology 2022-06, Vol.49 (6), p.629-636 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753 |
container_end_page | 636 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 629 |
container_title | Journal of dermatology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Yu, Rentao Chen, Shuang Pan, Yun Ma, Chunrong Hu, Li Chen, Aijun Wei, Bin |
description | The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1346-8138.16369 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652582197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672193072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1O3DAQB3CrKupuoefekCUuvWTXH3HiHNECbRESB-BsJfZYm1ViL3YCzY134A15knq7wIFLfbE0-vkvzwxC3ylZ0HSWlOdFJimXC1rwovqE5u-Vz2hOuBQZy0k5Q19j3BDCKkHJFzTjIuelFHKO7Mr3TevA4DEC9hbrSXc-bn1IRdw6PKwBDwHqoQc37MDNAA_g4svT86Vfu-gdjpMzwfewHPyfVmPYtgZCX3fYgQ6-m2Ibj9CBrbsI317vQ3R3cX67-pVdXf_8vTq9yjQXsspsbgXV1jR1XVBm8qbMGwNgOJSaScMqDrwyUgMQY2tmeWWFzstCggRalYIfoh_73G3w9yPEQfVt1NB1tQM_RsUKwYRkySZ68oFu_Bhc-l1SZSKclCyp5V6lTmIMYNU2tH0dJkWJ2q1A7QaudgNX_1aQXhy_5o5ND-bdv808AbEHj20H0__y1OXZ-T74L0Jzk2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672193072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Yu, Rentao ; Chen, Shuang ; Pan, Yun ; Ma, Chunrong ; Hu, Li ; Chen, Aijun ; Wei, Bin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rentao ; Chen, Shuang ; Pan, Yun ; Ma, Chunrong ; Hu, Li ; Chen, Aijun ; Wei, Bin</creatorcontrib><description>The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p < 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non‐cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17–3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re‐epithelialization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1346-8138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35437858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>body surface area detached ; Clinical outcomes ; cyclosporine ; Cyclosporins ; Disseminated infection ; Drug dosages ; Glucocorticoids ; Immunoglobulin G ; Inhibitor drugs ; Intravenous administration ; Patients ; Risk factors ; SCORTEN ; Side effects ; Skin diseases ; Stevens–Johnson syndrome ; Toxic epidermal necrolysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of dermatology, 2022-06, Vol.49 (6), p.629-636</ispartof><rights>2022 Japanese Dermatological Association</rights><rights>2022 Japanese Dermatological Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Japanese Dermatological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4952-9274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rentao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Bin</creatorcontrib><title>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</title><title>Journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>J Dermatol</addtitle><description>The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p < 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non‐cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17–3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re‐epithelialization.</description><subject>body surface area detached</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>cyclosporine</subject><subject>Cyclosporins</subject><subject>Disseminated infection</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Inhibitor drugs</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>SCORTEN</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Skin diseases</subject><subject>Stevens–Johnson syndrome</subject><subject>Toxic epidermal necrolysis</subject><issn>0385-2407</issn><issn>1346-8138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1O3DAQB3CrKupuoefekCUuvWTXH3HiHNECbRESB-BsJfZYm1ViL3YCzY134A15knq7wIFLfbE0-vkvzwxC3ylZ0HSWlOdFJimXC1rwovqE5u-Vz2hOuBQZy0k5Q19j3BDCKkHJFzTjIuelFHKO7Mr3TevA4DEC9hbrSXc-bn1IRdw6PKwBDwHqoQc37MDNAA_g4svT86Vfu-gdjpMzwfewHPyfVmPYtgZCX3fYgQ6-m2Ibj9CBrbsI317vQ3R3cX67-pVdXf_8vTq9yjQXsspsbgXV1jR1XVBm8qbMGwNgOJSaScMqDrwyUgMQY2tmeWWFzstCggRalYIfoh_73G3w9yPEQfVt1NB1tQM_RsUKwYRkySZ68oFu_Bhc-l1SZSKclCyp5V6lTmIMYNU2tH0dJkWJ2q1A7QaudgNX_1aQXhy_5o5ND-bdv808AbEHj20H0__y1OXZ-T74L0Jzk2E</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Yu, Rentao</creator><creator>Chen, Shuang</creator><creator>Pan, Yun</creator><creator>Ma, Chunrong</creator><creator>Hu, Li</creator><creator>Chen, Aijun</creator><creator>Wei, Bin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-9274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</title><author>Yu, Rentao ; Chen, Shuang ; Pan, Yun ; Ma, Chunrong ; Hu, Li ; Chen, Aijun ; Wei, Bin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>body surface area detached</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>cyclosporine</topic><topic>Cyclosporins</topic><topic>Disseminated infection</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Inhibitor drugs</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>SCORTEN</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Skin diseases</topic><topic>Stevens–Johnson syndrome</topic><topic>Toxic epidermal necrolysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rentao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Bin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Rentao</au><au>Chen, Shuang</au><au>Pan, Yun</au><au>Ma, Chunrong</au><au>Hu, Li</au><au>Chen, Aijun</au><au>Wei, Bin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>629-636</pages><issn>0385-2407</issn><eissn>1346-8138</eissn><abstract>The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p < 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non‐cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17–3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re‐epithelialization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35437858</pmid><doi>10.1111/1346-8138.16369</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-9274</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0385-2407 |
ispartof | Journal of dermatology, 2022-06, Vol.49 (6), p.629-636 |
issn | 0385-2407 1346-8138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652582197 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | body surface area detached Clinical outcomes cyclosporine Cyclosporins Disseminated infection Drug dosages Glucocorticoids Immunoglobulin G Inhibitor drugs Intravenous administration Patients Risk factors SCORTEN Side effects Skin diseases Stevens–Johnson syndrome Toxic epidermal necrolysis |
title | Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20use%20of%20cyclosporine%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20Stevens%E2%80%93Johnson%20syndrome/toxic%20epidermal%20necrolysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Yu,%20Rentao&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=629-636&rft.issn=0385-2407&rft.eissn=1346-8138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1346-8138.16369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672193072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672193072&rft_id=info:pmid/35437858&rfr_iscdi=true |