Loading…

Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucoco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dermatology 2022-06, Vol.49 (6), p.629-636
Main Authors: Yu, Rentao, Chen, Shuang, Pan, Yun, Ma, Chunrong, Hu, Li, Chen, Aijun, Wei, Bin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753
container_end_page 636
container_issue 6
container_start_page 629
container_title Journal of dermatology
container_volume 49
creator Yu, Rentao
Chen, Shuang
Pan, Yun
Ma, Chunrong
Hu, Li
Chen, Aijun
Wei, Bin
description The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1346-8138.16369
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652582197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672193072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1O3DAQB3CrKupuoefekCUuvWTXH3HiHNECbRESB-BsJfZYm1ViL3YCzY134A15knq7wIFLfbE0-vkvzwxC3ylZ0HSWlOdFJimXC1rwovqE5u-Vz2hOuBQZy0k5Q19j3BDCKkHJFzTjIuelFHKO7Mr3TevA4DEC9hbrSXc-bn1IRdw6PKwBDwHqoQc37MDNAA_g4svT86Vfu-gdjpMzwfewHPyfVmPYtgZCX3fYgQ6-m2Ibj9CBrbsI317vQ3R3cX67-pVdXf_8vTq9yjQXsspsbgXV1jR1XVBm8qbMGwNgOJSaScMqDrwyUgMQY2tmeWWFzstCggRalYIfoh_73G3w9yPEQfVt1NB1tQM_RsUKwYRkySZ68oFu_Bhc-l1SZSKclCyp5V6lTmIMYNU2tH0dJkWJ2q1A7QaudgNX_1aQXhy_5o5ND-bdv808AbEHj20H0__y1OXZ-T74L0Jzk2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672193072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Yu, Rentao ; Chen, Shuang ; Pan, Yun ; Ma, Chunrong ; Hu, Li ; Chen, Aijun ; Wei, Bin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rentao ; Chen, Shuang ; Pan, Yun ; Ma, Chunrong ; Hu, Li ; Chen, Aijun ; Wei, Bin</creatorcontrib><description>The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p &lt; 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non‐cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17–3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re‐epithelialization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1346-8138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35437858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>body surface area detached ; Clinical outcomes ; cyclosporine ; Cyclosporins ; Disseminated infection ; Drug dosages ; Glucocorticoids ; Immunoglobulin G ; Inhibitor drugs ; Intravenous administration ; Patients ; Risk factors ; SCORTEN ; Side effects ; Skin diseases ; Stevens–Johnson syndrome ; Toxic epidermal necrolysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of dermatology, 2022-06, Vol.49 (6), p.629-636</ispartof><rights>2022 Japanese Dermatological Association</rights><rights>2022 Japanese Dermatological Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Japanese Dermatological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4952-9274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rentao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Bin</creatorcontrib><title>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</title><title>Journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>J Dermatol</addtitle><description>The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p &lt; 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non‐cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17–3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re‐epithelialization.</description><subject>body surface area detached</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>cyclosporine</subject><subject>Cyclosporins</subject><subject>Disseminated infection</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Inhibitor drugs</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>SCORTEN</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Skin diseases</subject><subject>Stevens–Johnson syndrome</subject><subject>Toxic epidermal necrolysis</subject><issn>0385-2407</issn><issn>1346-8138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1O3DAQB3CrKupuoefekCUuvWTXH3HiHNECbRESB-BsJfZYm1ViL3YCzY134A15knq7wIFLfbE0-vkvzwxC3ylZ0HSWlOdFJimXC1rwovqE5u-Vz2hOuBQZy0k5Q19j3BDCKkHJFzTjIuelFHKO7Mr3TevA4DEC9hbrSXc-bn1IRdw6PKwBDwHqoQc37MDNAA_g4svT86Vfu-gdjpMzwfewHPyfVmPYtgZCX3fYgQ6-m2Ibj9CBrbsI317vQ3R3cX67-pVdXf_8vTq9yjQXsspsbgXV1jR1XVBm8qbMGwNgOJSaScMqDrwyUgMQY2tmeWWFzstCggRalYIfoh_73G3w9yPEQfVt1NB1tQM_RsUKwYRkySZ68oFu_Bhc-l1SZSKclCyp5V6lTmIMYNU2tH0dJkWJ2q1A7QaudgNX_1aQXhy_5o5ND-bdv808AbEHj20H0__y1OXZ-T74L0Jzk2E</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Yu, Rentao</creator><creator>Chen, Shuang</creator><creator>Pan, Yun</creator><creator>Ma, Chunrong</creator><creator>Hu, Li</creator><creator>Chen, Aijun</creator><creator>Wei, Bin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-9274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</title><author>Yu, Rentao ; Chen, Shuang ; Pan, Yun ; Ma, Chunrong ; Hu, Li ; Chen, Aijun ; Wei, Bin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>body surface area detached</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>cyclosporine</topic><topic>Cyclosporins</topic><topic>Disseminated infection</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Inhibitor drugs</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>SCORTEN</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Skin diseases</topic><topic>Stevens–Johnson syndrome</topic><topic>Toxic epidermal necrolysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rentao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Bin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Rentao</au><au>Chen, Shuang</au><au>Pan, Yun</au><au>Ma, Chunrong</au><au>Hu, Li</au><au>Chen, Aijun</au><au>Wei, Bin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>629-636</pages><issn>0385-2407</issn><eissn>1346-8138</eissn><abstract>The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side‐effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re‐epithelialized area than patients in the non‐cyclosporine group (p &lt; 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non‐cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17–3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re‐epithelialization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35437858</pmid><doi>10.1111/1346-8138.16369</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-9274</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0385-2407
ispartof Journal of dermatology, 2022-06, Vol.49 (6), p.629-636
issn 0385-2407
1346-8138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652582197
source Wiley
subjects body surface area detached
Clinical outcomes
cyclosporine
Cyclosporins
Disseminated infection
Drug dosages
Glucocorticoids
Immunoglobulin G
Inhibitor drugs
Intravenous administration
Patients
Risk factors
SCORTEN
Side effects
Skin diseases
Stevens–Johnson syndrome
Toxic epidermal necrolysis
title Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20use%20of%20cyclosporine%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20Stevens%E2%80%93Johnson%20syndrome/toxic%20epidermal%20necrolysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Yu,%20Rentao&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=629-636&rft.issn=0385-2407&rft.eissn=1346-8138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1346-8138.16369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672193072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3589-f4f51cfdbaa612d4b74bdeed3e7c28d293e39d8cee0dfa2f39f5c4768e8e19753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672193072&rft_id=info:pmid/35437858&rfr_iscdi=true