Preparation and properties investigation of biodegradable poly (glycerol sebacate‐co‐gelatin) containing nanoclay and graphene oxide for soft tissue engineering applications

• Published in: Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2022-10, Vol.110 (10), p.2241-2257
• Main Authors: Golbaten‐Mofrad, Hooman, Salehi, Mohammad Hadi, Jafari, Seyed Hassan, Goodarzi, Vahabodin, Entezari, Maliheh, Hashemi, Mehrdad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: biocompatibility; Biodegradability; biodegradable elastomer; Biodegradation; Biological analysis; Biological properties; Biomedical materials; Cell proliferation; Cell viability; Contact angle; Copolymers; Elastomers; Feasibility studies; Functional groups; Gelatin; Glycerol; Graphene; Hybrid composites; Hydrophilicity; Hydrophobicity; Materials research; Materials science; Mutagenesis; Nanocomposites; Nanoparticles; poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS); Soft tissues; Storage modulus; Swelling ratio; Tissue engineering
• ISSN: 1552-4973; 1552-4981
• DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35073

This study has attempted to systematically investigate the influence of nanoclay and graphene oxide (GO) on thermal, mechanical, hydrophobic, and, most importantly, biological properties of poly(glycerol sebacate)/gelatin (PGS/gel) nanocomposites. The PGS/gel copolymer nanocomposites were successfully synthesized via in situ polymerization, approved by rudimentary characterization methods. The nanofillers were appropriately dispersed within the elastomeric matrix according to morphological studies. Also, the fillers posed as a hydrophobic entity that slightly decreased the hydrophilic properties of PGS/gel. This could be sensed clearly in hybrid composite due to the robust network of GO and clay. Water contact angle values for gelatin‐contained nanocomposites were reported in the range of 38.42° to 66.7°, indicating the hydrophilic nature of the prepared samples. Thermal and mechanical studies of nanocomposites displayed rather contradicting results as the former improved while a slight decrease in the latter was noticed compared to the pristine specimens. In dry conditions, their storage modulus was in the range of 0.94–6.4 MPa, making them suitable for mimicking some soft tissues. The swelling ratio for nanocomposites containing nanoparticles was associated with an ascending trend so that GO improved the swelling rate by up to 45%. Biological analyses, such as Ames and in vitro cell viability tests, exhibited promising outcomes. As for the mutagenesis effect, the PGS and hybrid samples showed negative results. The presence of functional groups on the nanofillers' surface positively influenced the cells' metabolic activity as well as its attachment to the matrix. After 7 days, the cell proliferation rate resulted in an 82% improvement for the GO‐containing nanocomposite, significantly higher than its neat counterpart (65%). This study has shown the feasibility of the prepared bio‐elastomer nanocomposites for diverse tissue engineering applications.