Loading…
Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions
Aims To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion. Methods Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.72-80 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3 |
container_end_page | 80 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Orthodontics & craniofacial research |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Saadeh, Maria E. Ghafari, Joseph G. |
description | Aims
To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion.
Methods
Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables.
Results
PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%.
Conclusion
The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ocr.12580 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2655561492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760790276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoVqsH_4AEvOhh23xve5RiVSgUxJ5DNptASnZTk26l_97o1h4E38sMvA_DMADcYDTC-cZBxxEmfIJOwAUWCBeCMnp69JQPwGVKa4QIIkScgwHlrEScsQswX7XOhti47R4GCzfKq63ycBd81xio2hqmLlqls49GQdfCnYoudAk2ygetfZdcaNMVOLPKJ3N90CFYzZ_eZy_FYvn8OntcFJpyigqBNWVmwi2uxFQQJBijhtSlQVTVtCKmVDh_OeZ1KTQylouaslpohkqLKkuH4L7P3cTw0Zm0lY1L2nivWpNLSSI45wKzKcno3R90HbrY5naSlAKVU5QlUw89pWNIKRorN9E1Ku4lRvJ7XJnHlT_jZvb2kNhVjamP5O-aGRj3wKfzZv9_klzO3vrIL32igfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760790276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Saadeh, Maria E. ; Ghafari, Joseph G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saadeh, Maria E. ; Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion.
Methods
Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables.
Results
PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%.
Conclusion
The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-6335</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12580</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35470544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Dental occlusion ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II ; Odontometry ; Orthodontics ; palatal surface ; palatal volume ; Palate ; Phenotypes ; Surface area ; three‐dimensional</subject><ispartof>Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.72-80</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0094-3570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saadeh, Maria E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><title>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</title><title>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</title><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><description>Aims
To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion.
Methods
Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables.
Results
PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%.
Conclusion
The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.</description><subject>Dental occlusion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</subject><subject>Odontometry</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>palatal surface</subject><subject>palatal volume</subject><subject>Palate</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>three‐dimensional</subject><issn>1601-6335</issn><issn>1601-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoVqsH_4AEvOhh23xve5RiVSgUxJ5DNptASnZTk26l_97o1h4E38sMvA_DMADcYDTC-cZBxxEmfIJOwAUWCBeCMnp69JQPwGVKa4QIIkScgwHlrEScsQswX7XOhti47R4GCzfKq63ycBd81xio2hqmLlqls49GQdfCnYoudAk2ygetfZdcaNMVOLPKJ3N90CFYzZ_eZy_FYvn8OntcFJpyigqBNWVmwi2uxFQQJBijhtSlQVTVtCKmVDh_OeZ1KTQylouaslpohkqLKkuH4L7P3cTw0Zm0lY1L2nivWpNLSSI45wKzKcno3R90HbrY5naSlAKVU5QlUw89pWNIKRorN9E1Ku4lRvJ7XJnHlT_jZvb2kNhVjamP5O-aGRj3wKfzZv9_klzO3vrIL32igfs</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Saadeh, Maria E.</creator><creator>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-3570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</title><author>Saadeh, Maria E. ; Ghafari, Joseph G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dental occlusion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</topic><topic>Odontometry</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>palatal surface</topic><topic>palatal volume</topic><topic>Palate</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>three‐dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saadeh, Maria E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saadeh, Maria E.</au><au>Ghafari, Joseph G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</atitle><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>72-80</pages><issn>1601-6335</issn><eissn>1601-6343</eissn><abstract>Aims
To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion.
Methods
Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables.
Results
PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%.
Conclusion
The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35470544</pmid><doi>10.1111/ocr.12580</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-3570</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1601-6335 |
ispartof | Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.72-80 |
issn | 1601-6335 1601-6343 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2655561492 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Dental occlusion Female Humans Male Malocclusion Malocclusion, Angle Class II Odontometry Orthodontics palatal surface palatal volume Palate Phenotypes Surface area three‐dimensional |
title | Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uniformity%20of%20palatal%20volume%20and%20surface%20area%20in%20various%20malocclusions&rft.jtitle=Orthodontics%20&%20craniofacial%20research&rft.au=Saadeh,%20Maria%20E.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=72-80&rft.issn=1601-6335&rft.eissn=1601-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ocr.12580&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760790276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760790276&rft_id=info:pmid/35470544&rfr_iscdi=true |