Loading…

Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions

Aims To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion. Methods Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.72-80
Main Authors: Saadeh, Maria E., Ghafari, Joseph G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3
container_end_page 80
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
container_title Orthodontics & craniofacial research
container_volume 26
creator Saadeh, Maria E.
Ghafari, Joseph G.
description Aims To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion. Methods Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables. Results PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%. Conclusion The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ocr.12580
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2655561492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760790276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoVqsH_4AEvOhh23xve5RiVSgUxJ5DNptASnZTk26l_97o1h4E38sMvA_DMADcYDTC-cZBxxEmfIJOwAUWCBeCMnp69JQPwGVKa4QIIkScgwHlrEScsQswX7XOhti47R4GCzfKq63ycBd81xio2hqmLlqls49GQdfCnYoudAk2ygetfZdcaNMVOLPKJ3N90CFYzZ_eZy_FYvn8OntcFJpyigqBNWVmwi2uxFQQJBijhtSlQVTVtCKmVDh_OeZ1KTQylouaslpohkqLKkuH4L7P3cTw0Zm0lY1L2nivWpNLSSI45wKzKcno3R90HbrY5naSlAKVU5QlUw89pWNIKRorN9E1Ku4lRvJ7XJnHlT_jZvb2kNhVjamP5O-aGRj3wKfzZv9_klzO3vrIL32igfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760790276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Saadeh, Maria E. ; Ghafari, Joseph G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saadeh, Maria E. ; Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion. Methods Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables. Results PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%. Conclusion The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-6335</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12580</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35470544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Dental occlusion ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II ; Odontometry ; Orthodontics ; palatal surface ; palatal volume ; Palate ; Phenotypes ; Surface area ; three‐dimensional</subject><ispartof>Orthodontics &amp; craniofacial research, 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.72-80</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0094-3570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saadeh, Maria E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><title>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</title><title>Orthodontics &amp; craniofacial research</title><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><description>Aims To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion. Methods Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables. Results PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%. Conclusion The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.</description><subject>Dental occlusion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</subject><subject>Odontometry</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>palatal surface</subject><subject>palatal volume</subject><subject>Palate</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>three‐dimensional</subject><issn>1601-6335</issn><issn>1601-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoVqsH_4AEvOhh23xve5RiVSgUxJ5DNptASnZTk26l_97o1h4E38sMvA_DMADcYDTC-cZBxxEmfIJOwAUWCBeCMnp69JQPwGVKa4QIIkScgwHlrEScsQswX7XOhti47R4GCzfKq63ycBd81xio2hqmLlqls49GQdfCnYoudAk2ygetfZdcaNMVOLPKJ3N90CFYzZ_eZy_FYvn8OntcFJpyigqBNWVmwi2uxFQQJBijhtSlQVTVtCKmVDh_OeZ1KTQylouaslpohkqLKkuH4L7P3cTw0Zm0lY1L2nivWpNLSSI45wKzKcno3R90HbrY5naSlAKVU5QlUw89pWNIKRorN9E1Ku4lRvJ7XJnHlT_jZvb2kNhVjamP5O-aGRj3wKfzZv9_klzO3vrIL32igfs</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Saadeh, Maria E.</creator><creator>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-3570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</title><author>Saadeh, Maria E. ; Ghafari, Joseph G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dental occlusion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II</topic><topic>Odontometry</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>palatal surface</topic><topic>palatal volume</topic><topic>Palate</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>three‐dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saadeh, Maria E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthodontics &amp; craniofacial research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saadeh, Maria E.</au><au>Ghafari, Joseph G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions</atitle><jtitle>Orthodontics &amp; craniofacial research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>72-80</pages><issn>1601-6335</issn><eissn>1601-6343</eissn><abstract>Aims To assess palatal volume, surface area and linear dimensions across sagittal and vertical components of malocclusion. Methods Pre‐treatment cephalographs and dental casts of 178 non‐growing patients (88 males, 90 females, age 25.81 ± 8.23 years) were used for classification in sagittal malocclusion groups: Class I (n = 48), Class II division 1 (n = 42), Class II division 2 (n = 40) and Class III (n = 48); and in vertical divergence groups based on the MP/SN angle: hypodivergent (n = 35), normodivergent (n = 95) and hyperdivergent (n = 48). Dental casts were scanned and palatal measurements recorded: palatal width, depth and interdental distances; palatal surface area (PSA, mm2) and volume (PV, mm3). A 3‐way ANOVA was used to compare palatal dimensions across groups. Pearson product‐moment correlations were employed to assess associations among variables. Results PSA and PV (in both sex groups) were not statistically significantly different across sagittal malocclusions and vertical patterns. Significant differences were depicted more among the vertical divergence groups than sagittal groups. Correlations between PSA and PV and palatal dimensions were low to moderate. Predictability of PSA and PV ranged between 15 and 18%. Conclusion The finding of similar palatal volume and surface area, on average, across malocclusions possibly underscores the limitations of environmental influences within the inherited orofacial phenotype. The vertical facial pattern seems to be more interactive with palatal dimensions than sagittal relations. Studies of palatal changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments are warranted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35470544</pmid><doi>10.1111/ocr.12580</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-3570</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1601-6335
ispartof Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.72-80
issn 1601-6335
1601-6343
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2655561492
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Dental occlusion
Female
Humans
Male
Malocclusion
Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Odontometry
Orthodontics
palatal surface
palatal volume
Palate
Phenotypes
Surface area
three‐dimensional
title Uniformity of palatal volume and surface area in various malocclusions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uniformity%20of%20palatal%20volume%20and%20surface%20area%20in%20various%20malocclusions&rft.jtitle=Orthodontics%20&%20craniofacial%20research&rft.au=Saadeh,%20Maria%20E.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=72-80&rft.issn=1601-6335&rft.eissn=1601-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ocr.12580&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760790276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-61c34e85f1b696206443e2d7e03ad3b2e7a185f515d76c0ef56d34d6c407f0bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760790276&rft_id=info:pmid/35470544&rfr_iscdi=true