Estimating the 3‐D location of impacted maxillary canines: A CBCT‐based analysis of severity of impaction

• Published in: Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2023-02, Vol.26 (1), p.81-90
• Main Authors: Ross, Greg, Abu Arqub, Sarah, Mehta, Shivam, Vishwanath, Meenakshi, Tadinada, Aditya, Yadav, Sumit, Upadhyay, Madhur
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: CBCT; classification system; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods; Cuspid - diagnostic imaging; Female; Humans; impacted maxillary canines; Incisor; Male; Maxilla; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging; Regression analysis; severity; Tooth Root; Tooth, Impacted - diagnostic imaging
• ISSN: 1601-6335; 1601-6343
• DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12581

Objectives The objective of the study was to quantify the 3‐D location of impacted canines by measuring their linear and angular deviations in relation to adjacent structures and further evaluate impaction severity. Methods CBCT images of 314 impacted canines were analysed in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. Linear and angular measurements were recorded. Canine inclination was identified in coronal and sagittal planes. An evaluation system was constructed for analysis. Upright canine was considered as the appropriate position for fully erupted maxillary canine. Outcomes were compared between right and left sides and by gender. For categorical variables, chi‐square tests were used while Mann‐Whitney U test was used for continuous variables. Regression models were used to measure severity. Results Impactions were greater in females (119/207; 57.5%). No significant differences between unilateral (100/207; 49.3%) and bilateral (107/207; 51.7%) (P > 0.05). Out of 314 impactions, 105 (33.4%) were mild, 118 (37.58%) moderate and 91 (28.98%) severe. Severe impactions were primarily buccal (44/ 91; 48.3%), in the occlusal ½ of the adjacent incisor root (38/ 91, 41.7%), mesial to the distal border of central incisor (47/91, 51.6%), with sagittal angle value + >45 ̊ (46/ 91, 50.5%) and mesial tip + >30 ̊ (86/ 91, 94.5%). Conclusions Severely impacted canines had their crowns buccal, closer to occlusal plane and mesial to the distal border of the central incisor with greater than 45‐degree buccal inclination and greater than 30‐degree mesial tip. The sagittal angle can have a significant impact on the severity of impaction. A new classification system was proposed to quantify severity.