Loading…
Validation of an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device employing a novel method to detect atrial fibrillation
We evaluated the accuracy of a 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device with a new irregular heartbeat (IHB) algorithm for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) during each BP measurement. Ninety patients with a history of elevated BP and some type of arrhythmia (mean age 63.2 ± 10.3 ye...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hypertension research 2022-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1345-1352 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We evaluated the accuracy of a 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device with a new irregular heartbeat (IHB) algorithm for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) during each BP measurement. Ninety patients with a history of elevated BP and some type of arrhythmia (mean age 63.2 ± 10.3 years; 94% with hypertension; 81% with previously diagnosed AF) simultaneously underwent evaluation by 24-hr ABPM with the IHB algorithm and 24-hr Holter electrocardiography (ECG). Among the 3,347 valid readings, 843 readings were considered to indicate an IHB. Among these IHB readings, 195 readings were found to have an AF rhythm by 24-hr Holter ECG. The IHB algorithm showed 100% sensitivity and 79.4% specificity for accurately detecting AF rhythm. An IHB was detected in 12.1% of the measurements during normal rhythm, 48.8% of those during atrial premature complex, and 54.4% of those during ventricular premature complex. The percentage of IHBs detected during normal rhythm was higher in the daytime than at nighttime (16.3% vs. 4.5%, respectively), suggesting that daytime physical activity sometimes induces a false detection of IHBs. The optimal IHB parameters for suggesting potential AF were (1) an IHB burden defined as a percentage of IHB-positive readings in total valid BP measurements >22.5% (84.6% sensitivity, 85.1% specificity; AUC 0.906, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0916-9636 1348-4214 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41440-022-00925-0 |