Loading…
Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task
The working memory Stroop task is to name the color of a rectangular patch with keypress while holding a color word in working memory. Previous studies using this variant of the Stroop task have shown that congruency between the color patch and the color word significantly affects both color naming...
Saved in:
Published in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2022-07, Vol.84 (5), p.1635-1650 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6572e2f457cd1a772d18cce4e331f0de2d7b8963ca4d4076142bca3c65ae3cec3 |
container_end_page | 1650 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1635 |
container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Pan, Yi Zhang, Zheyu Hu, Xinkui Zuo, Wuheng |
description | The working memory Stroop task is to name the color of a rectangular patch with keypress while holding a color word in working memory. Previous studies using this variant of the Stroop task have shown that congruency between the color patch and the color word significantly affects both color naming and working memory, with the worsening of task performance when the color patch is semantically incongruent rather than congruent with the color word. However, it remains unclear with regard to cognitive mechanisms underlying such congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task. By including a control condition among the congruent and incongruent conditions in a working memory Stroop task, the present study showed that nearly all of the working memory Stroop effect can be facilitation, and that interference, if present, is markedly smaller than facilitation in this form of the Stroop effect. There was also a critical contrast between the working memory and classic Stroop effects in terms of facilitation and interference, with larger facilitation and smaller interference in the working memory Stroop effect than in the classic Stroop effect. Moreover, working memory for a color word can be either facilitated or interfered with by the perceptual judgment (color naming) of an interposed color patch during the retention interval, depending on whether the color patch is semantically congruent or incongruent with the color word. Together, these results suggest that both facilitation and interference mechanisms can contribute to the overall congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-022-02494-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2659228714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2659228714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6572e2f457cd1a772d18cce4e331f0de2d7b8963ca4d4076142bca3c65ae3cec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBdS8MabapKTNO2VyPALBoIf4F3o0tPZbW1m0ir792ZuTvDCi5BAnvc9h4eQY0bPQcn0wjMQTMSU83BEJmLYIX2WCYghg9fd7ZuzHjnwfkppAomi-6QHUlIm06xPLh_xo_JVWzWTyNhm4jpszDLCskTT-qhqovYNo0_rZiuixtq6ZfTUOmsXUZv72SHZK_O5x6PNPSAvN9fPw7t49HB7P7waxQYUbeNEKo68FFKZguVK8YKlxqBAAFbSAnmhxmmWgMlFIahKmOBjk4NJZI5g0MCAnK17F86-d-hbXVfe4HyeN2g7r3kiM85TxURAT_-gU9u5JmwXqJRJzgTLAsXXlHHWe4elXriqzt1SM6pXevVarw569bdeDSF0sqnuxjUW28iPzwDAGvDhq5mg-539T-0XvjeFGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681521419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Pan, Yi ; Zhang, Zheyu ; Hu, Xinkui ; Zuo, Wuheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yi ; Zhang, Zheyu ; Hu, Xinkui ; Zuo, Wuheng</creatorcontrib><description>The working memory Stroop task is to name the color of a rectangular patch with keypress while holding a color word in working memory. Previous studies using this variant of the Stroop task have shown that congruency between the color patch and the color word significantly affects both color naming and working memory, with the worsening of task performance when the color patch is semantically incongruent rather than congruent with the color word. However, it remains unclear with regard to cognitive mechanisms underlying such congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task. By including a control condition among the congruent and incongruent conditions in a working memory Stroop task, the present study showed that nearly all of the working memory Stroop effect can be facilitation, and that interference, if present, is markedly smaller than facilitation in this form of the Stroop effect. There was also a critical contrast between the working memory and classic Stroop effects in terms of facilitation and interference, with larger facilitation and smaller interference in the working memory Stroop effect than in the classic Stroop effect. Moreover, working memory for a color word can be either facilitated or interfered with by the perceptual judgment (color naming) of an interposed color patch during the retention interval, depending on whether the color patch is semantically congruent or incongruent with the color word. Together, these results suggest that both facilitation and interference mechanisms can contribute to the overall congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02494-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35501589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Evidence ; Memorization ; Memory ; Names ; Naming ; Psychological Studies ; Psychology ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Short Term Memory ; Whole language approach</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022-07, Vol.84 (5), p.1635-1650</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6572e2f457cd1a772d18cce4e331f0de2d7b8963ca4d4076142bca3c65ae3cec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2681521419/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2681521419?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880,74093,74269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501589$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zheyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xinkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Wuheng</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>The working memory Stroop task is to name the color of a rectangular patch with keypress while holding a color word in working memory. Previous studies using this variant of the Stroop task have shown that congruency between the color patch and the color word significantly affects both color naming and working memory, with the worsening of task performance when the color patch is semantically incongruent rather than congruent with the color word. However, it remains unclear with regard to cognitive mechanisms underlying such congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task. By including a control condition among the congruent and incongruent conditions in a working memory Stroop task, the present study showed that nearly all of the working memory Stroop effect can be facilitation, and that interference, if present, is markedly smaller than facilitation in this form of the Stroop effect. There was also a critical contrast between the working memory and classic Stroop effects in terms of facilitation and interference, with larger facilitation and smaller interference in the working memory Stroop effect than in the classic Stroop effect. Moreover, working memory for a color word can be either facilitated or interfered with by the perceptual judgment (color naming) of an interposed color patch during the retention interval, depending on whether the color patch is semantically congruent or incongruent with the color word. Together, these results suggest that both facilitation and interference mechanisms can contribute to the overall congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Memorization</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Names</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Psychological Studies</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Whole language approach</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBdS8MabapKTNO2VyPALBoIf4F3o0tPZbW1m0ir792ZuTvDCi5BAnvc9h4eQY0bPQcn0wjMQTMSU83BEJmLYIX2WCYghg9fd7ZuzHjnwfkppAomi-6QHUlIm06xPLh_xo_JVWzWTyNhm4jpszDLCskTT-qhqovYNo0_rZiuixtq6ZfTUOmsXUZv72SHZK_O5x6PNPSAvN9fPw7t49HB7P7waxQYUbeNEKo68FFKZguVK8YKlxqBAAFbSAnmhxmmWgMlFIahKmOBjk4NJZI5g0MCAnK17F86-d-hbXVfe4HyeN2g7r3kiM85TxURAT_-gU9u5JmwXqJRJzgTLAsXXlHHWe4elXriqzt1SM6pXevVarw569bdeDSF0sqnuxjUW28iPzwDAGvDhq5mg-539T-0XvjeFGQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Pan, Yi</creator><creator>Zhang, Zheyu</creator><creator>Hu, Xinkui</creator><creator>Zuo, Wuheng</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task</title><author>Pan, Yi ; Zhang, Zheyu ; Hu, Xinkui ; Zuo, Wuheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6572e2f457cd1a772d18cce4e331f0de2d7b8963ca4d4076142bca3c65ae3cec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Memorization</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Names</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Psychological Studies</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Whole language approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zheyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xinkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Wuheng</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Yi</au><au>Zhang, Zheyu</au><au>Hu, Xinkui</au><au>Zuo, Wuheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1635</spage><epage>1650</epage><pages>1635-1650</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>The working memory Stroop task is to name the color of a rectangular patch with keypress while holding a color word in working memory. Previous studies using this variant of the Stroop task have shown that congruency between the color patch and the color word significantly affects both color naming and working memory, with the worsening of task performance when the color patch is semantically incongruent rather than congruent with the color word. However, it remains unclear with regard to cognitive mechanisms underlying such congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task. By including a control condition among the congruent and incongruent conditions in a working memory Stroop task, the present study showed that nearly all of the working memory Stroop effect can be facilitation, and that interference, if present, is markedly smaller than facilitation in this form of the Stroop effect. There was also a critical contrast between the working memory and classic Stroop effects in terms of facilitation and interference, with larger facilitation and smaller interference in the working memory Stroop effect than in the classic Stroop effect. Moreover, working memory for a color word can be either facilitated or interfered with by the perceptual judgment (color naming) of an interposed color patch during the retention interval, depending on whether the color patch is semantically congruent or incongruent with the color word. Together, these results suggest that both facilitation and interference mechanisms can contribute to the overall congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35501589</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-022-02494-3</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022-07, Vol.84 (5), p.1635-1650 |
issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2659228714 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Evidence Memorization Memory Names Naming Psychological Studies Psychology Semantics Semiotics Short Term Memory Whole language approach |
title | Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20congruency%20effects%20in%20the%20working%20memory%20Stroop%20task&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Pan,%20Yi&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1635&rft.epage=1650&rft.pages=1635-1650&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-022-02494-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2659228714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6572e2f457cd1a772d18cce4e331f0de2d7b8963ca4d4076142bca3c65ae3cec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681521419&rft_id=info:pmid/35501589&rfr_iscdi=true |