Loading…

Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment

The hip abductor muscles control the pelvis in the frontal plane and allow the maintenance of trunk position and dynamic balance during weight-bearing activities. To compare the side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment with regards to torque production and myolectric ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2022-04, Vol.30, p.181-186
Main Authors: de Castro, Marcelo P., Sanchotene, Cristiano G., Costa, Guilherme V., Lopes, Cristiano M.S., Hubert, Marcel, de Brito Fontana, Heiliane, Ruschel, Caroline
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993
container_end_page 186
container_issue
container_start_page 181
container_title Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
container_volume 30
creator de Castro, Marcelo P.
Sanchotene, Cristiano G.
Costa, Guilherme V.
Lopes, Cristiano M.S.
Hubert, Marcel
de Brito Fontana, Heiliane
Ruschel, Caroline
description The hip abductor muscles control the pelvis in the frontal plane and allow the maintenance of trunk position and dynamic balance during weight-bearing activities. To compare the side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment with regards to torque production and myolectric activity. Concentric and eccentric hip abductor peak torque and total work, and myoelectric activity of the tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus muscles were measured during maximal isokinetic tests for hip abductor strength in the side-lying and standing positions. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare variables between the positions. Peak torque values did not differ between side-lying and standing positions for both concentric and eccentric contraction modes (p > .05). During standing position, greater concentric total work was observed (p = .013). This position resulted in a lower activity of the tensor fascia lata muscle (p = .005) compared to side lying position. Myoelectric activity of gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus was similar between positions (p > .05). Both positions presented similar peak torque values and, during the standing position, a greater concentric total work and lesser activation of the tensor fascia lata was observed. Standing position can be used when emphasis on the superior portion of gluteus maximus over the tensor fascia lata is intended. •Standing can be used when emphasis on the superior gluteus over the tensor fascia lata is intended.•Side-lying and standing positions are comparable in terms of peak torque values.•Maximal hip abductor concentric work is greater during standing compared to side-lying position.•Reduced activity of the tensor fascia lata is achieved at standing position.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2659229269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1360859222000274</els_id><sourcerecordid>2659229269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMovn_AhfTSTY95dIcJuJHBFwhudOEqJJ1qzTCdtKmMMn9vmlGXQlF1C25dqEPIGaMzRpm8XM6WdsgzTjmf0VKM7ZBD1gpeKz4Xu0ULSet5q_gBOUJcUkpVw9U-ORBtW7RUh-R1EYfRJI8xVBbyF0Co0DuoVxsf3ioTXIW59GkZI_rsY8Cqj6l692NlrFt3uSyYE4S3_F4ZREAcIOQTstebFcLpzzwmL7c3z4v7-vHp7mFx_Vh3opW5dsI2klolbOuAcWiZYn1vZEMF4w6aObdtw6Ep0hnmJHfU0uKSvXWWKiWOycU2d0zxYw2Y9eCxg9XKBIhr1FwWAFxxOVn51tqliJig12Pyg0kbzaiekOqlnpDqCammpRgrR-c_-Ws7gPs7-WVYDFdbA5QvPz0kjZ2H0IHzCbqsXfT_5X8DhR2JRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659229269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>de Castro, Marcelo P. ; Sanchotene, Cristiano G. ; Costa, Guilherme V. ; Lopes, Cristiano M.S. ; Hubert, Marcel ; de Brito Fontana, Heiliane ; Ruschel, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>de Castro, Marcelo P. ; Sanchotene, Cristiano G. ; Costa, Guilherme V. ; Lopes, Cristiano M.S. ; Hubert, Marcel ; de Brito Fontana, Heiliane ; Ruschel, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>The hip abductor muscles control the pelvis in the frontal plane and allow the maintenance of trunk position and dynamic balance during weight-bearing activities. To compare the side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment with regards to torque production and myolectric activity. Concentric and eccentric hip abductor peak torque and total work, and myoelectric activity of the tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus muscles were measured during maximal isokinetic tests for hip abductor strength in the side-lying and standing positions. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare variables between the positions. Peak torque values did not differ between side-lying and standing positions for both concentric and eccentric contraction modes (p &gt; .05). During standing position, greater concentric total work was observed (p = .013). This position resulted in a lower activity of the tensor fascia lata muscle (p = .005) compared to side lying position. Myoelectric activity of gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus was similar between positions (p &gt; .05). Both positions presented similar peak torque values and, during the standing position, a greater concentric total work and lesser activation of the tensor fascia lata was observed. Standing position can be used when emphasis on the superior portion of gluteus maximus over the tensor fascia lata is intended. •Standing can be used when emphasis on the superior gluteus over the tensor fascia lata is intended.•Side-lying and standing positions are comparable in terms of peak torque values.•Maximal hip abductor concentric work is greater during standing compared to side-lying position.•Reduced activity of the tensor fascia lata is achieved at standing position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-8592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35500969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Buttocks ; Electromyography ; Gluteal muscles ; Hip ; Humans ; Isokinetic dynamometry ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Standing Position ; Tensor fascia lata ; Thigh</subject><ispartof>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2022-04, Vol.30, p.181-186</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4263-850X ; 0000-0002-4416-853X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35500969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Castro, Marcelo P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchotene, Cristiano G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Guilherme V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Cristiano M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Brito Fontana, Heiliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruschel, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment</title><title>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</title><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><description>The hip abductor muscles control the pelvis in the frontal plane and allow the maintenance of trunk position and dynamic balance during weight-bearing activities. To compare the side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment with regards to torque production and myolectric activity. Concentric and eccentric hip abductor peak torque and total work, and myoelectric activity of the tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus muscles were measured during maximal isokinetic tests for hip abductor strength in the side-lying and standing positions. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare variables between the positions. Peak torque values did not differ between side-lying and standing positions for both concentric and eccentric contraction modes (p &gt; .05). During standing position, greater concentric total work was observed (p = .013). This position resulted in a lower activity of the tensor fascia lata muscle (p = .005) compared to side lying position. Myoelectric activity of gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus was similar between positions (p &gt; .05). Both positions presented similar peak torque values and, during the standing position, a greater concentric total work and lesser activation of the tensor fascia lata was observed. Standing position can be used when emphasis on the superior portion of gluteus maximus over the tensor fascia lata is intended. •Standing can be used when emphasis on the superior gluteus over the tensor fascia lata is intended.•Side-lying and standing positions are comparable in terms of peak torque values.•Maximal hip abductor concentric work is greater during standing compared to side-lying position.•Reduced activity of the tensor fascia lata is achieved at standing position.</description><subject>Buttocks</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Gluteal muscles</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isokinetic dynamometry</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Standing Position</subject><subject>Tensor fascia lata</subject><subject>Thigh</subject><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMovn_AhfTSTY95dIcJuJHBFwhudOEqJJ1qzTCdtKmMMn9vmlGXQlF1C25dqEPIGaMzRpm8XM6WdsgzTjmf0VKM7ZBD1gpeKz4Xu0ULSet5q_gBOUJcUkpVw9U-ORBtW7RUh-R1EYfRJI8xVBbyF0Co0DuoVxsf3ioTXIW59GkZI_rsY8Cqj6l692NlrFt3uSyYE4S3_F4ZREAcIOQTstebFcLpzzwmL7c3z4v7-vHp7mFx_Vh3opW5dsI2klolbOuAcWiZYn1vZEMF4w6aObdtw6Ep0hnmJHfU0uKSvXWWKiWOycU2d0zxYw2Y9eCxg9XKBIhr1FwWAFxxOVn51tqliJig12Pyg0kbzaiekOqlnpDqCammpRgrR-c_-Ws7gPs7-WVYDFdbA5QvPz0kjZ2H0IHzCbqsXfT_5X8DhR2JRg</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>de Castro, Marcelo P.</creator><creator>Sanchotene, Cristiano G.</creator><creator>Costa, Guilherme V.</creator><creator>Lopes, Cristiano M.S.</creator><creator>Hubert, Marcel</creator><creator>de Brito Fontana, Heiliane</creator><creator>Ruschel, Caroline</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4263-850X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4416-853X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment</title><author>de Castro, Marcelo P. ; Sanchotene, Cristiano G. ; Costa, Guilherme V. ; Lopes, Cristiano M.S. ; Hubert, Marcel ; de Brito Fontana, Heiliane ; Ruschel, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Buttocks</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Gluteal muscles</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isokinetic dynamometry</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Standing Position</topic><topic>Tensor fascia lata</topic><topic>Thigh</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Castro, Marcelo P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchotene, Cristiano G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Guilherme V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Cristiano M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Brito Fontana, Heiliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruschel, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Castro, Marcelo P.</au><au>Sanchotene, Cristiano G.</au><au>Costa, Guilherme V.</au><au>Lopes, Cristiano M.S.</au><au>Hubert, Marcel</au><au>de Brito Fontana, Heiliane</au><au>Ruschel, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>181</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>181-186</pages><issn>1360-8592</issn><eissn>1532-9283</eissn><abstract>The hip abductor muscles control the pelvis in the frontal plane and allow the maintenance of trunk position and dynamic balance during weight-bearing activities. To compare the side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment with regards to torque production and myolectric activity. Concentric and eccentric hip abductor peak torque and total work, and myoelectric activity of the tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus muscles were measured during maximal isokinetic tests for hip abductor strength in the side-lying and standing positions. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare variables between the positions. Peak torque values did not differ between side-lying and standing positions for both concentric and eccentric contraction modes (p &gt; .05). During standing position, greater concentric total work was observed (p = .013). This position resulted in a lower activity of the tensor fascia lata muscle (p = .005) compared to side lying position. Myoelectric activity of gluteus medius, and inferior and superior portions of the gluteus maximus was similar between positions (p &gt; .05). Both positions presented similar peak torque values and, during the standing position, a greater concentric total work and lesser activation of the tensor fascia lata was observed. Standing position can be used when emphasis on the superior portion of gluteus maximus over the tensor fascia lata is intended. •Standing can be used when emphasis on the superior gluteus over the tensor fascia lata is intended.•Side-lying and standing positions are comparable in terms of peak torque values.•Maximal hip abductor concentric work is greater during standing compared to side-lying position.•Reduced activity of the tensor fascia lata is achieved at standing position.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35500969</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4263-850X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4416-853X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-8592
ispartof Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2022-04, Vol.30, p.181-186
issn 1360-8592
1532-9283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2659229269
source Elsevier
subjects Buttocks
Electromyography
Gluteal muscles
Hip
Humans
Isokinetic dynamometry
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Standing Position
Tensor fascia lata
Thigh
title Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A41%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20side-lying%20and%20standing%20positions%20for%20hip%20abductor%20strength%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bodywork%20and%20movement%20therapies&rft.au=de%20Castro,%20Marcelo%20P.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=181-186&rft.issn=1360-8592&rft.eissn=1532-9283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2659229269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d3b460b93b5de12e5191ffa640312de482b542e4de4da1d62d0b0e516fbdb0993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659229269&rft_id=info:pmid/35500969&rfr_iscdi=true