Acoustic analysis of the effect of personal protective equipment on speech understanding: lessons for clinical environments

• Published in: International journal of audiology 2023-07, Vol.62 (7), p.682-687
• Main Authors: Mcleod, Robert W. J., Gallagher, Maria, Hall, Andy, Bant, Sarah P., Culling, John F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustics; communication; Covid-19; COVID-19 - prevention & control; Humans; mask; Noise - adverse effects; Noise - prevention & control; Personal Protective Equipment; Speech Intelligibility
• ISSN: 1499-2027; 1708-8186
• DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2070780

The use of various types of filtering facepiece class 3 (FFP3) mask have become commonplace since the Covid-19 outbreak. These have been evaluated in terms of efficacy regarding aerosol filtration but less emphasis has been placed on the acoustic effects of such masks and their consequences for clinical communication. A microphone 65 cm from a sound-producing Head and Torso Simulator (wearing the masks) was used to measure attenuation via a tone sweep. Predicted impact on speech reception in noise was assessed by weighting the attenuations of cochlear excitation patterns by the frequency importance function of the Speech Intelligibility Index. We evaluated acoustic attenuation properties of seven FFP3 masks and a Type IIR surgical mask (as a comparator). The Type IIR mask had the smallest impact on SNR (2.6 dB with visor). Most FFP3s with an addition of a visor (if not already face covering) impacted SNR by approximately 6 dB. The 3 M 6000 was significantly worse (15.8 dB). Mouth-and-nose covering FFP3s masks had similar effects on SNR (≈6.2 dB with visor). The Tecmen TM-H2 had several advantages over other masks evaluated. It was reusable, allowed lipreading clues and the attenuation was similar to other FFP3s.