Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): Guidelines are important but proper implementation is essential

With the retrospective approach, a much larger patient population can be studied in a “real life” setting, as the patients and the health care professionals will not have known that they would be part of the study. Furthermore, errors and misses in the individual data sets are typically more frequen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2022-09, Vol.80, p.110882-110882, Article 110882
Main Authors: Raeder, Johan C., White, Paul F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analgesics
Anesthesia
Clinical outcomes
Disease prevention
Health care
Hospitals
Length of stay
Narcotics
Patient safety
Patient satisfaction
Quality control
Recovery (Medical)
Success
Surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:With the retrospective approach, a much larger patient population can be studied in a “real life” setting, as the patients and the health care professionals will not have known that they would be part of the study. Furthermore, errors and misses in the individual data sets are typically more frequent than with a conventional prospective study design. Dong and colleagues performed a large retrospective quality assurance assessment of an ERAS protocol for kidney donor nephrectomy, which was implemented during a 9 year period at the UCLA Medical Center [3]. [...]less than 60% of the patients studied received IV ketorolac.
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110882