Loading…

Is what you see what you get? The relationship between field observed and laboratory observed aphid parasitism rates in canola fields

Background Estimating parasitoid abundance in the field can be difficult, even more so when attempting to quantify parasitism rates and the ecosystem service of biological control that parasitoids can provide. To understand how ‘field observed’ parasitism rates (in‐field mummy counts) of the green p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pest management science 2022-08, Vol.78 (8), p.3596-3607
Main Authors: Ward, Samantha Elizabeth, Umina, Paul A., Parry, Hazel, Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber, Cheng, Xuan, Heddle, Thomas, Holloway, Joanne C., Langley, Caitlin, Severtson, Dustin, Helden, Maarten Van, Hoffmann, Ary A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03
container_end_page 3607
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3596
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 78
creator Ward, Samantha Elizabeth
Umina, Paul A.
Parry, Hazel
Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber
Cheng, Xuan
Heddle, Thomas
Holloway, Joanne C.
Langley, Caitlin
Severtson, Dustin
Helden, Maarten Van
Hoffmann, Ary A.
description Background Estimating parasitoid abundance in the field can be difficult, even more so when attempting to quantify parasitism rates and the ecosystem service of biological control that parasitoids can provide. To understand how ‘field observed’ parasitism rates (in‐field mummy counts) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) translate to ‘laboratory observed’ parasitism rates (laboratory‐reared parasitoid counts), field work was undertaken in Australian canola fields, over the winter growing season. Results Overall, laboratory observed parasitism was on average 2.4 times higher than field observed parasitism, with rates an average of four‐fold higher in fields from South Australia. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates (OPRs) of M. persicae varied considerably across regions, but less so among fields within regions. As crop growth stage progressed, the incidence of field observed mummies increased. The incidence of total parasitoids reared also increased with crop growth stage, averaging 3.4% during flowering and reaching 14.4% during podding/senescing. Although there was a greater diversity of reared parasitoid species at later crop growth stages, the laboratory OPR was unaffected by parasitoid species. Diaeretiella rapae was the most commonly reared parasitoid, increasing in absolute abundance with crop growth stage. Conclusion These findings indicate that field mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of parasitism within canola fields. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates of Myzus persicae varied considerably, indicating that mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of aphid parasitism in canola fields.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ps.7002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2668218337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2668218337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10dtqFEEQBuBGFBOj-AbS4IVC2NiHOVRfiQQ1gYCCEbwbaqZr3A6z02PXjMs-QN7bjptEEbyqPnz8FPxCPNfqRCtl3kx8Uuf5QBzq0lSrwjl4eH-GbwfiCfOVUso5Zx6LA1tWqlAFHIrrc5bbNc5yFxfJRH8u32l-Ky_XJBMNOIc48jpMsqV5SzTKPtDgZWyZ0k_yEkcvB2xjwjmm3V_v0zp4OWFCDnPgjcyAWIZRdjjGAfc5_FQ86nFgenY7j8TXD-8vT89WF58-np--u1h1tgazws50urC2ND12DmqPdY-F0w4UuB5a01f5U2kP3lsES1RmDrpHVBZaZY_E633ulOKPhXhuNoE7GgYcKS7cmKoCo8HaOtOX_9CruKQxb5cVAJSZVlm92qsuReZEfTOlsMG0a7RqbpppJm5umsnyxW3e0m7I37u7KjI43oNtGGj3v5zm85ffcb8A4ISXKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2688856686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is what you see what you get? The relationship between field observed and laboratory observed aphid parasitism rates in canola fields</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth ; Umina, Paul A. ; Parry, Hazel ; Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber ; Cheng, Xuan ; Heddle, Thomas ; Holloway, Joanne C. ; Langley, Caitlin ; Severtson, Dustin ; Helden, Maarten Van ; Hoffmann, Ary A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth ; Umina, Paul A. ; Parry, Hazel ; Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber ; Cheng, Xuan ; Heddle, Thomas ; Holloway, Joanne C. ; Langley, Caitlin ; Severtson, Dustin ; Helden, Maarten Van ; Hoffmann, Ary A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Estimating parasitoid abundance in the field can be difficult, even more so when attempting to quantify parasitism rates and the ecosystem service of biological control that parasitoids can provide. To understand how ‘field observed’ parasitism rates (in‐field mummy counts) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) translate to ‘laboratory observed’ parasitism rates (laboratory‐reared parasitoid counts), field work was undertaken in Australian canola fields, over the winter growing season. Results Overall, laboratory observed parasitism was on average 2.4 times higher than field observed parasitism, with rates an average of four‐fold higher in fields from South Australia. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates (OPRs) of M. persicae varied considerably across regions, but less so among fields within regions. As crop growth stage progressed, the incidence of field observed mummies increased. The incidence of total parasitoids reared also increased with crop growth stage, averaging 3.4% during flowering and reaching 14.4% during podding/senescing. Although there was a greater diversity of reared parasitoid species at later crop growth stages, the laboratory OPR was unaffected by parasitoid species. Diaeretiella rapae was the most commonly reared parasitoid, increasing in absolute abundance with crop growth stage. Conclusion These findings indicate that field mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of parasitism within canola fields. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates of Myzus persicae varied considerably, indicating that mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of aphid parasitism in canola fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.7002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35604048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Aphididae ; Aphidiinae ; Biological control ; Canola ; Crop growth ; Crops ; Ecosystem services ; Flowering ; Growing season ; Growth stage ; hymenoptera ; Laboratories ; Myzus persicae ; Parasitism ; Parasitoids ; Pest control ; Species diversity</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2022-08, Vol.78 (8), p.3596-3607</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3400-8900 ; 0000-0003-2742-4201 ; 0000-0002-1835-3571 ; 0000-0002-6747-3182 ; 0000-0002-7548-9299</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35604048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umina, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heddle, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Joanne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langley, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severtson, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helden, Maarten Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Ary A.</creatorcontrib><title>Is what you see what you get? The relationship between field observed and laboratory observed aphid parasitism rates in canola fields</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>Background Estimating parasitoid abundance in the field can be difficult, even more so when attempting to quantify parasitism rates and the ecosystem service of biological control that parasitoids can provide. To understand how ‘field observed’ parasitism rates (in‐field mummy counts) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) translate to ‘laboratory observed’ parasitism rates (laboratory‐reared parasitoid counts), field work was undertaken in Australian canola fields, over the winter growing season. Results Overall, laboratory observed parasitism was on average 2.4 times higher than field observed parasitism, with rates an average of four‐fold higher in fields from South Australia. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates (OPRs) of M. persicae varied considerably across regions, but less so among fields within regions. As crop growth stage progressed, the incidence of field observed mummies increased. The incidence of total parasitoids reared also increased with crop growth stage, averaging 3.4% during flowering and reaching 14.4% during podding/senescing. Although there was a greater diversity of reared parasitoid species at later crop growth stages, the laboratory OPR was unaffected by parasitoid species. Diaeretiella rapae was the most commonly reared parasitoid, increasing in absolute abundance with crop growth stage. Conclusion These findings indicate that field mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of parasitism within canola fields. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates of Myzus persicae varied considerably, indicating that mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of aphid parasitism in canola fields.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Aphidiinae</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Canola</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Growth stage</subject><subject>hymenoptera</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Myzus persicae</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Parasitoids</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10dtqFEEQBuBGFBOj-AbS4IVC2NiHOVRfiQQ1gYCCEbwbaqZr3A6z02PXjMs-QN7bjptEEbyqPnz8FPxCPNfqRCtl3kx8Uuf5QBzq0lSrwjl4eH-GbwfiCfOVUso5Zx6LA1tWqlAFHIrrc5bbNc5yFxfJRH8u32l-Ky_XJBMNOIc48jpMsqV5SzTKPtDgZWyZ0k_yEkcvB2xjwjmm3V_v0zp4OWFCDnPgjcyAWIZRdjjGAfc5_FQ86nFgenY7j8TXD-8vT89WF58-np--u1h1tgazws50urC2ND12DmqPdY-F0w4UuB5a01f5U2kP3lsES1RmDrpHVBZaZY_E633ulOKPhXhuNoE7GgYcKS7cmKoCo8HaOtOX_9CruKQxb5cVAJSZVlm92qsuReZEfTOlsMG0a7RqbpppJm5umsnyxW3e0m7I37u7KjI43oNtGGj3v5zm85ffcb8A4ISXKg</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth</creator><creator>Umina, Paul A.</creator><creator>Parry, Hazel</creator><creator>Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber</creator><creator>Cheng, Xuan</creator><creator>Heddle, Thomas</creator><creator>Holloway, Joanne C.</creator><creator>Langley, Caitlin</creator><creator>Severtson, Dustin</creator><creator>Helden, Maarten Van</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Ary A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-8900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1835-3571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-3182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-9299</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Is what you see what you get? The relationship between field observed and laboratory observed aphid parasitism rates in canola fields</title><author>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth ; Umina, Paul A. ; Parry, Hazel ; Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber ; Cheng, Xuan ; Heddle, Thomas ; Holloway, Joanne C. ; Langley, Caitlin ; Severtson, Dustin ; Helden, Maarten Van ; Hoffmann, Ary A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Aphidiinae</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Canola</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Growth stage</topic><topic>hymenoptera</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Myzus persicae</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Parasitoids</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umina, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heddle, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Joanne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langley, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severtson, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helden, Maarten Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Ary A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, Samantha Elizabeth</au><au>Umina, Paul A.</au><au>Parry, Hazel</au><au>Balfour‐Cunningham, Amber</au><au>Cheng, Xuan</au><au>Heddle, Thomas</au><au>Holloway, Joanne C.</au><au>Langley, Caitlin</au><au>Severtson, Dustin</au><au>Helden, Maarten Van</au><au>Hoffmann, Ary A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is what you see what you get? The relationship between field observed and laboratory observed aphid parasitism rates in canola fields</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3596</spage><epage>3607</epage><pages>3596-3607</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>Background Estimating parasitoid abundance in the field can be difficult, even more so when attempting to quantify parasitism rates and the ecosystem service of biological control that parasitoids can provide. To understand how ‘field observed’ parasitism rates (in‐field mummy counts) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) translate to ‘laboratory observed’ parasitism rates (laboratory‐reared parasitoid counts), field work was undertaken in Australian canola fields, over the winter growing season. Results Overall, laboratory observed parasitism was on average 2.4 times higher than field observed parasitism, with rates an average of four‐fold higher in fields from South Australia. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates (OPRs) of M. persicae varied considerably across regions, but less so among fields within regions. As crop growth stage progressed, the incidence of field observed mummies increased. The incidence of total parasitoids reared also increased with crop growth stage, averaging 3.4% during flowering and reaching 14.4% during podding/senescing. Although there was a greater diversity of reared parasitoid species at later crop growth stages, the laboratory OPR was unaffected by parasitoid species. Diaeretiella rapae was the most commonly reared parasitoid, increasing in absolute abundance with crop growth stage. Conclusion These findings indicate that field mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of parasitism within canola fields. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Total field observed and laboratory observed parasitism rates of Myzus persicae varied considerably, indicating that mummy counts alone do not provide a clear representation of aphid parasitism in canola fields.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>35604048</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.7002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-8900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1835-3571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-3182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-9299</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2022-08, Vol.78 (8), p.3596-3607
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2668218337
source Wiley
subjects Abundance
Aphididae
Aphidiinae
Biological control
Canola
Crop growth
Crops
Ecosystem services
Flowering
Growing season
Growth stage
hymenoptera
Laboratories
Myzus persicae
Parasitism
Parasitoids
Pest control
Species diversity
title Is what you see what you get? The relationship between field observed and laboratory observed aphid parasitism rates in canola fields
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A13%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20what%20you%20see%20what%20you%20get?%20The%20relationship%20between%20field%20observed%20and%20laboratory%20observed%20aphid%20parasitism%20rates%20in%20canola%20fields&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Ward,%20Samantha%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3596&rft.epage=3607&rft.pages=3596-3607&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.7002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2668218337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-ac2c143352fac987da7fa49198089f8b2f633501d8dd3a83ee514381faa038b03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2688856686&rft_id=info:pmid/35604048&rfr_iscdi=true