Loading…

Social Media vs. Mass Media: Mitigating the Suspicion of Ulterior Motives in Public Health Communication

Two experiments examined if persuasive effectiveness of health messages varies as a function of the communication channel (Facebook vs. news website), and if so, why. Specifically, we examined perceived ulterior motives of the communicator as an explanation for why public health campaigns may be les...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health communication 2023-09, Vol.38 (11), p.2450-2460
Main Authors: Lee, Eun-Ju, Kim, Hyun Suk, Joo, Min Hwi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633
container_end_page 2460
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2450
container_title Health communication
container_volume 38
creator Lee, Eun-Ju
Kim, Hyun Suk
Joo, Min Hwi
description Two experiments examined if persuasive effectiveness of health messages varies as a function of the communication channel (Facebook vs. news website), and if so, why. Specifically, we examined perceived ulterior motives of the communicator as an explanation for why public health campaigns may be less effective when conveyed via mass-directed (vs. interpersonal) channels, and further investigated if message recipients' health interest moderates such channel effects, if any. In Study 1 (N = 103), reading a medical news reporter's Facebook post on dental health (vs. a news article consisting of the identical content) lowered the participants' suspicion of ulterior motives of the source, which then promoted message-consistent attitudes and behavioral intention. Such effects, however, emerged only for those more interested in health. Using a different topic (a low-carb, high-fat diet), Study 2 (N = 338) replicated Study 1 findings, confirming the conditional persuasive advantages of social media over mass media as a health campaign channel.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10410236.2022.2074781
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2669501948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2669501948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi1ERUvhJ4AsceGyqb-9ywkUAUVq1EqlZ8v2ehtXXjvY3qL-exwl5cCBy3xIz7wzmheAdxitMOrRBUYMI0LFiiBCWpBM9vgFOMOckk4iIl-2ujHdHjoFr0t5QAhxwcgrcEq5wIhzdga2t8l6HeDGjV7Dx7KCG13Kof0EN776e119vId16-DtUnbe-hRhmuBdqC77lOEmVf_oCvQR3iwmeAsvnQ51C9dpnpfobRNI8Q04mXQo7u0xn4O7b19_ri-7q-vvP9ZfrjrLGK6dGTAXEx-dEE46KZARQnBCJbXSWcMpnohzmmKKDMbSMNQPkzFa8JE6Kyg9Bx8Purucfi2uVDX7Yl0IOrq0FEWEGDjCA-sb-uEf9CEtObbrFOkFowNnA2oUP1A2p1Kym9Qu-1nnJ4WR2luhnq1QeyvU0Yo29_6ovpjZjX-nnn_fgM8HwMcp5Vn_TjmMquqnkPKUdbS-KPr_HX8A3OeWnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864395490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Media vs. Mass Media: Mitigating the Suspicion of Ulterior Motives in Public Health Communication</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Lee, Eun-Ju ; Kim, Hyun Suk ; Joo, Min Hwi</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun-Ju ; Kim, Hyun Suk ; Joo, Min Hwi</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments examined if persuasive effectiveness of health messages varies as a function of the communication channel (Facebook vs. news website), and if so, why. Specifically, we examined perceived ulterior motives of the communicator as an explanation for why public health campaigns may be less effective when conveyed via mass-directed (vs. interpersonal) channels, and further investigated if message recipients' health interest moderates such channel effects, if any. In Study 1 (N = 103), reading a medical news reporter's Facebook post on dental health (vs. a news article consisting of the identical content) lowered the participants' suspicion of ulterior motives of the source, which then promoted message-consistent attitudes and behavioral intention. Such effects, however, emerged only for those more interested in health. Using a different topic (a low-carb, high-fat diet), Study 2 (N = 338) replicated Study 1 findings, confirming the conditional persuasive advantages of social media over mass media as a health campaign channel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-0236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7027</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2074781</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35610554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Campaigns ; Communication ; Dental health ; Diet ; Digital media ; Health education ; Health information ; Health promotion ; High fat diet ; Low fat diet ; Mass media ; Messages ; Motivation ; News ; News media ; Nutrient deficiency ; Persuasion ; Public health ; Social media ; Social networks</subject><ispartof>Health communication, 2023-09, Vol.38 (11), p.2450-2460</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9803-314X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,30986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610554$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Min Hwi</creatorcontrib><title>Social Media vs. Mass Media: Mitigating the Suspicion of Ulterior Motives in Public Health Communication</title><title>Health communication</title><addtitle>Health Commun</addtitle><description>Two experiments examined if persuasive effectiveness of health messages varies as a function of the communication channel (Facebook vs. news website), and if so, why. Specifically, we examined perceived ulterior motives of the communicator as an explanation for why public health campaigns may be less effective when conveyed via mass-directed (vs. interpersonal) channels, and further investigated if message recipients' health interest moderates such channel effects, if any. In Study 1 (N = 103), reading a medical news reporter's Facebook post on dental health (vs. a news article consisting of the identical content) lowered the participants' suspicion of ulterior motives of the source, which then promoted message-consistent attitudes and behavioral intention. Such effects, however, emerged only for those more interested in health. Using a different topic (a low-carb, high-fat diet), Study 2 (N = 338) replicated Study 1 findings, confirming the conditional persuasive advantages of social media over mass media as a health campaign channel.</description><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Dental health</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health information</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>High fat diet</subject><subject>Low fat diet</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Messages</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Persuasion</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><issn>1041-0236</issn><issn>1532-7027</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi1ERUvhJ4AsceGyqb-9ywkUAUVq1EqlZ8v2ehtXXjvY3qL-exwl5cCBy3xIz7wzmheAdxitMOrRBUYMI0LFiiBCWpBM9vgFOMOckk4iIl-2ujHdHjoFr0t5QAhxwcgrcEq5wIhzdga2t8l6HeDGjV7Dx7KCG13Kof0EN776e119vId16-DtUnbe-hRhmuBdqC77lOEmVf_oCvQR3iwmeAsvnQ51C9dpnpfobRNI8Q04mXQo7u0xn4O7b19_ri-7q-vvP9ZfrjrLGK6dGTAXEx-dEE46KZARQnBCJbXSWcMpnohzmmKKDMbSMNQPkzFa8JE6Kyg9Bx8Purucfi2uVDX7Yl0IOrq0FEWEGDjCA-sb-uEf9CEtObbrFOkFowNnA2oUP1A2p1Kym9Qu-1nnJ4WR2luhnq1QeyvU0Yo29_6ovpjZjX-nnn_fgM8HwMcp5Vn_TjmMquqnkPKUdbS-KPr_HX8A3OeWnA</recordid><startdate>20230919</startdate><enddate>20230919</enddate><creator>Lee, Eun-Ju</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun Suk</creator><creator>Joo, Min Hwi</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-314X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230919</creationdate><title>Social Media vs. Mass Media: Mitigating the Suspicion of Ulterior Motives in Public Health Communication</title><author>Lee, Eun-Ju ; Kim, Hyun Suk ; Joo, Min Hwi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Dental health</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health information</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>High fat diet</topic><topic>Low fat diet</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Messages</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Persuasion</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Min Hwi</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Eun-Ju</au><au>Kim, Hyun Suk</au><au>Joo, Min Hwi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Media vs. Mass Media: Mitigating the Suspicion of Ulterior Motives in Public Health Communication</atitle><jtitle>Health communication</jtitle><addtitle>Health Commun</addtitle><date>2023-09-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2450</spage><epage>2460</epage><pages>2450-2460</pages><issn>1041-0236</issn><eissn>1532-7027</eissn><abstract>Two experiments examined if persuasive effectiveness of health messages varies as a function of the communication channel (Facebook vs. news website), and if so, why. Specifically, we examined perceived ulterior motives of the communicator as an explanation for why public health campaigns may be less effective when conveyed via mass-directed (vs. interpersonal) channels, and further investigated if message recipients' health interest moderates such channel effects, if any. In Study 1 (N = 103), reading a medical news reporter's Facebook post on dental health (vs. a news article consisting of the identical content) lowered the participants' suspicion of ulterior motives of the source, which then promoted message-consistent attitudes and behavioral intention. Such effects, however, emerged only for those more interested in health. Using a different topic (a low-carb, high-fat diet), Study 2 (N = 338) replicated Study 1 findings, confirming the conditional persuasive advantages of social media over mass media as a health campaign channel.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>35610554</pmid><doi>10.1080/10410236.2022.2074781</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-314X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1041-0236
ispartof Health communication, 2023-09, Vol.38 (11), p.2450-2460
issn 1041-0236
1532-7027
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2669501948
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis
subjects Campaigns
Communication
Dental health
Diet
Digital media
Health education
Health information
Health promotion
High fat diet
Low fat diet
Mass media
Messages
Motivation
News
News media
Nutrient deficiency
Persuasion
Public health
Social media
Social networks
title Social Media vs. Mass Media: Mitigating the Suspicion of Ulterior Motives in Public Health Communication
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A32%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Media%20vs.%20Mass%20Media:%20Mitigating%20the%20Suspicion%20of%20Ulterior%20Motives%20in%20Public%20Health%20Communication&rft.jtitle=Health%20communication&rft.au=Lee,%20Eun-Ju&rft.date=2023-09-19&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2450&rft.epage=2460&rft.pages=2450-2460&rft.issn=1041-0236&rft.eissn=1532-7027&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10410236.2022.2074781&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2669501948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b9156f5de66e7e760b66652373c7ecb531f2eea3130b117b4089fbba65d3ec633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864395490&rft_id=info:pmid/35610554&rfr_iscdi=true