Loading…
Comparison of day‐case versus inpatient uni‐compartmental knee replacement
Background Uni‐compartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an alternative to total knee replacement for patients who have isolated compartment osteoarthritis. Studies have demonstrated that UKR can be safely performed as a day‐case procedure without a negative impact on complication rates. The aim of th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Musculoskeletal care 2023-03, Vol.21 (1), p.16-24 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Uni‐compartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an alternative to total knee replacement for patients who have isolated compartment osteoarthritis. Studies have demonstrated that UKR can be safely performed as a day‐case procedure without a negative impact on complication rates. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between day‐case and inpatient UKRs.
Methods
A single surgeon prospective case‐controlled study was performed, comparing data between day‐case UKRs and inpatient UKRs. This included longitudinal analysis of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); including the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Short Form 12‐item Health Survey, EQ‐5D‐5L and the Self‐administered Comorbidity Questionnaire. Post‐operative pain scores (visual analogue scale), unplanned post‐operative hospital reattendance rates and complications were also analysed.
Results
Overall, 100% of day‐case patients were successfully discharged on the same day. Both inpatient (n = 23) and day‐case (n = 23) UKRs demonstrated a significant within group longitudinal improvement of PROM scores (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1478-2189 1557-0681 |
DOI: | 10.1002/msc.1662 |