Time to Contrast Models of Timing: The Structure of Temporal Memory

In the study of animal timing over the last 100 years, we identify three different periods, each characterized by a distinct activity. In the first period, researchers brought timing into the laboratory and explored its multiple expressions empirically. In the second period, the growing body of empi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral neuroscience 2022-10, Vol.136 (5), p.404-417
Main Authors: Machado, Armando, Carvalho, Marilia Pinheiro de, Vasconcelos, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal
Animal Learning
Animal Motivation
Expectancy
Expectations
Memory
Simulation
Theoretical Orientation
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the study of animal timing over the last 100 years, we identify three different periods, each characterized by a distinct activity. In the first period, researchers brought timing into the laboratory and explored its multiple expressions empirically. In the second period, the growing body of empirical findings inspired researchers to develop a plethora of timing models that vary in theoretical orientation, scope, depth, and quantitative explicitness. We argue that it is now the time to advance towards a third period, wherein researchers select models by comparing them with one another and with data. We make our case by contrasting how the scalar expectancy theory and the learning-to-time model conceive of temporal memory and learning both in concurrent timing tasks and in retrospective timing tasks. We identify four problems related to the structure of temporal memory and to the rules of temporal learning that challenge these models and that should drive the next steps in modeling the timing abilities of animals.
ISSN:0735-7044
1939-0084
DOI:10.1037/bne0000521