Loading…

Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review

A social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest policy and economics 2022-08, Vol.141, p.102762, Article 102762
Main Authors: Sanz-Hernández, Alexia, Jiménez-Caballero, Paula, Zarauz, Irene
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102762
container_title Forest policy and economics
container_volume 141
creator Sanz-Hernández, Alexia
Jiménez-Caballero, Paula
Zarauz, Irene
description A social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention bioeconomy and gender/women in their title, abstract, keywords or text; 127 documents were identified as having high (19) or medium (108) gender-oriented centrality. The literature is fragmented but six cross-sectional key themes have been identified: Gender and social impacts of the bioeconomy; gender equality as a goal and a just policy; gender differences in perceptions, discourses and strategies relating to the bioeconomy; women as potential stakeholders and actors in the transition towards bioeconomy; frameworks, strategies, and tools to connect gender and the bioeconomy; and gender inequalities and geography. Moreover, they show hardly any connection with the three predominant social currents in the struggle for gender equality: grassroots social movements, ecofeminism, and intersectionality. The paper concludes by identifying key pathways for future research to address current gaps. We suggest integrating a feminist metatheoretical base with an integrative ontology, an epistemology that recognises its own partiality and situationality, and a methodology sensitive to the specificities of the contexts which are committed to the goal of transforming women's everyday contexts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675576769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389934122000740</els_id><sourcerecordid>2675576769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxdZuumYR5M0LoRBdBQG3Og6tOktZGiTMcko8--N1rWr--CcA-dD6JqSFSVU3u5WQ4j7MK4YYay8mJLsBC1oo1iliCCnZeeNrjSv6Tm6SGlHCFWE8gXabsD3EHHre_wVJvDYeZysA5_d4CweXYbY5kMEHDzuXAAbfJiOd3iN0zFlmNpcZBE-HXxdorOhHRNc_c0len96fHt4rravm5eH9bayvBG5EkrQTtZdL8upes2EJIqojjadho7omtp64KQlSlghpOZcqIbpoat7rrS1fIlu5tx9DB8HSNlMLlkYx9ZDOCTDpBJCSVWsS1TPUhtDShEGs49uauPRUGJ-4JmdmeGZH3hmhlds97MNSo1SLZpfJhZ6F8Fm0wf3f8A3saF4_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675576769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia ; Jiménez-Caballero, Paula ; Zarauz, Irene</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia ; Jiménez-Caballero, Paula ; Zarauz, Irene</creatorcontrib><description>A social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention bioeconomy and gender/women in their title, abstract, keywords or text; 127 documents were identified as having high (19) or medium (108) gender-oriented centrality. The literature is fragmented but six cross-sectional key themes have been identified: Gender and social impacts of the bioeconomy; gender equality as a goal and a just policy; gender differences in perceptions, discourses and strategies relating to the bioeconomy; women as potential stakeholders and actors in the transition towards bioeconomy; frameworks, strategies, and tools to connect gender and the bioeconomy; and gender inequalities and geography. Moreover, they show hardly any connection with the three predominant social currents in the struggle for gender equality: grassroots social movements, ecofeminism, and intersectionality. The paper concludes by identifying key pathways for future research to address current gaps. We suggest integrating a feminist metatheoretical base with an integrative ontology, an epistemology that recognises its own partiality and situationality, and a methodology sensitive to the specificities of the contexts which are committed to the goal of transforming women's everyday contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>bioeconomics ; Feminist perspectives ; forest policy ; Gender ; geography ; Inclusive bioeconomy ; stakeholders ; Systematic review ; vision</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2022-08, Vol.141, p.102762, Article 102762</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Caballero, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarauz, Irene</creatorcontrib><title>Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>A social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention bioeconomy and gender/women in their title, abstract, keywords or text; 127 documents were identified as having high (19) or medium (108) gender-oriented centrality. The literature is fragmented but six cross-sectional key themes have been identified: Gender and social impacts of the bioeconomy; gender equality as a goal and a just policy; gender differences in perceptions, discourses and strategies relating to the bioeconomy; women as potential stakeholders and actors in the transition towards bioeconomy; frameworks, strategies, and tools to connect gender and the bioeconomy; and gender inequalities and geography. Moreover, they show hardly any connection with the three predominant social currents in the struggle for gender equality: grassroots social movements, ecofeminism, and intersectionality. The paper concludes by identifying key pathways for future research to address current gaps. We suggest integrating a feminist metatheoretical base with an integrative ontology, an epistemology that recognises its own partiality and situationality, and a methodology sensitive to the specificities of the contexts which are committed to the goal of transforming women's everyday contexts.</description><subject>bioeconomics</subject><subject>Feminist perspectives</subject><subject>forest policy</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>geography</subject><subject>Inclusive bioeconomy</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>vision</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxdZuumYR5M0LoRBdBQG3Og6tOktZGiTMcko8--N1rWr--CcA-dD6JqSFSVU3u5WQ4j7MK4YYay8mJLsBC1oo1iliCCnZeeNrjSv6Tm6SGlHCFWE8gXabsD3EHHre_wVJvDYeZysA5_d4CweXYbY5kMEHDzuXAAbfJiOd3iN0zFlmNpcZBE-HXxdorOhHRNc_c0len96fHt4rravm5eH9bayvBG5EkrQTtZdL8upes2EJIqojjadho7omtp64KQlSlghpOZcqIbpoat7rrS1fIlu5tx9DB8HSNlMLlkYx9ZDOCTDpBJCSVWsS1TPUhtDShEGs49uauPRUGJ-4JmdmeGZH3hmhlds97MNSo1SLZpfJhZ6F8Fm0wf3f8A3saF4_w</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia</creator><creator>Jiménez-Caballero, Paula</creator><creator>Zarauz, Irene</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review</title><author>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia ; Jiménez-Caballero, Paula ; Zarauz, Irene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>bioeconomics</topic><topic>Feminist perspectives</topic><topic>forest policy</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>geography</topic><topic>Inclusive bioeconomy</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Caballero, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarauz, Irene</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanz-Hernández, Alexia</au><au>Jiménez-Caballero, Paula</au><au>Zarauz, Irene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>102762</spage><pages>102762-</pages><artnum>102762</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>A social vision is slowly emerging of the bioeconomy as an avenue towards sustainability. This paper presents a systematic review of the existing literature on the connection between gender (as a social dimension) and bioeconomy. We have reviewed 244 scientific publications which explicitly mention bioeconomy and gender/women in their title, abstract, keywords or text; 127 documents were identified as having high (19) or medium (108) gender-oriented centrality. The literature is fragmented but six cross-sectional key themes have been identified: Gender and social impacts of the bioeconomy; gender equality as a goal and a just policy; gender differences in perceptions, discourses and strategies relating to the bioeconomy; women as potential stakeholders and actors in the transition towards bioeconomy; frameworks, strategies, and tools to connect gender and the bioeconomy; and gender inequalities and geography. Moreover, they show hardly any connection with the three predominant social currents in the struggle for gender equality: grassroots social movements, ecofeminism, and intersectionality. The paper concludes by identifying key pathways for future research to address current gaps. We suggest integrating a feminist metatheoretical base with an integrative ontology, an epistemology that recognises its own partiality and situationality, and a methodology sensitive to the specificities of the contexts which are committed to the goal of transforming women's everyday contexts.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-9341
ispartof Forest policy and economics, 2022-08, Vol.141, p.102762, Article 102762
issn 1389-9341
1872-7050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675576769
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects bioeconomics
Feminist perspectives
forest policy
Gender
geography
Inclusive bioeconomy
stakeholders
Systematic review
vision
title Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20and%20women%20in%20scientific%20literature%20on%20bioeconomy:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Sanz-Hern%C3%A1ndez,%20Alexia&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=102762&rft.pages=102762-&rft.artnum=102762&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2675576769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5751b64bd63857d92560707b18b9eb0941c4f30a075c55693357829fb4d379cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675576769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true