Loading…
Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm
To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental management 2022-09, Vol.317, p.115300-115300, Article 115300 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893 |
container_end_page | 115300 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115300 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 317 |
creator | Casas-Monroy, Oscar Kydd, Jocelyn Rozon, Robin M. Bailey, Sarah A. |
description | To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675580812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479722008738</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671270644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFu1DAUhiMEokPhCCAvWZDh2Y6dREJCVUUBqRKb7i3Hfhk8SuLBLzNVuQG36IZbsOoBOAQnwdMZ2MLKsvW975ffXxTPOSw5cP16vVzjtBvttBQgxJJzJQEeFAsOrSobLeFhsQAJvKzqtj4pnhCtAUAKXj8uTqTSQnKhF8XtGREShWnF5s_INpj6mLLVIYs96-M2sTD54OwcdsjsZIcbCsQ87oJDykBinR0GSzO7tjMm5uK4GcK9YIxTmGPK7lf5eaLgcX9hMa3sFGikrL5PpfAVWbLTCtmvb985sDmyNwrubn_-GJ8Wj3o7ED47nqfF1cW7q_MP5eWn9x_Pzy5LV1VqLmXLPe-l9r5qUPUdB1SqaVEqV3sL0tUOUOiuqcB23vtaY9Vx50HpyjatPC1eHrSbFL9skWYzBnKYfzZh3JIRus4-aLj4H5SLGnRVZVQdUJciUcLebFIYbboxHMy-RrM2xxrNvkZzqDHPvThGbLsR_d-pP71l4O0BwLySXcBkyAXMS_choZuNj-EfEb8BeZG10w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671270644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Casas-Monroy, Oscar ; Kydd, Jocelyn ; Rozon, Robin M. ; Bailey, Sarah A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casas-Monroy, Oscar ; Kydd, Jocelyn ; Rozon, Robin M. ; Bailey, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><description>To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to <50 μm in minimum dimension (e.g., phytoplankton, including autotrophs, heterotrophs or mixotrophs), using field and laboratory tests. Comparisons were conducted on (treated) ballast water discharge samples collected across Canada during three consecutive years (2017–2019). During seven tests in 2019, paired ballast water uptake samples were also obtained, facilitating measurements before and after treatment was applied. Indicative analysis devices also were challenged with natural environmental samples containing different organism abundance levels, ranging from low (nominally <10 cells mL−1) to high (nominally >150 cells mL−1) during laboratory tests. While the indicative analysis devices examined during this research produced numeric estimates having weak correlations with the standard reference method, categorical outcomes (above/below the D-2 standard) had high agreement (89% or better) when assessing ballast water samples, but lower agreement (67% or poorer) during laboratory tests. There was a relatively high rate of false negative results measured by all devices during laboratory tests. Results provided by indicative analysis devices had higher uncertainty when organism abundances in ballast samples are below and close to the D-2 standards.
•Indicative devices had weak correlation with microscopy based on numeric estimates.•Categorical outcomes had high agreement for ballast water samples.•Uncertainty was higher for abundances below and close to the D-2 standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35623126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic invasive species ; Autotrophs ; ballast water ; Ballast water management ; Ballast water treatment ; Canada ; compliance ; Compliance monitoring devices ; environmental management ; Heterotrophs ; microscopy ; Phytoplankton ; uncertainty ; water management ; water uptake</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-09, Vol.317, p.115300-115300, Article 115300</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3635-919X ; 0000-0002-1916-7017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kydd, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozon, Robin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to <50 μm in minimum dimension (e.g., phytoplankton, including autotrophs, heterotrophs or mixotrophs), using field and laboratory tests. Comparisons were conducted on (treated) ballast water discharge samples collected across Canada during three consecutive years (2017–2019). During seven tests in 2019, paired ballast water uptake samples were also obtained, facilitating measurements before and after treatment was applied. Indicative analysis devices also were challenged with natural environmental samples containing different organism abundance levels, ranging from low (nominally <10 cells mL−1) to high (nominally >150 cells mL−1) during laboratory tests. While the indicative analysis devices examined during this research produced numeric estimates having weak correlations with the standard reference method, categorical outcomes (above/below the D-2 standard) had high agreement (89% or better) when assessing ballast water samples, but lower agreement (67% or poorer) during laboratory tests. There was a relatively high rate of false negative results measured by all devices during laboratory tests. Results provided by indicative analysis devices had higher uncertainty when organism abundances in ballast samples are below and close to the D-2 standards.
•Indicative devices had weak correlation with microscopy based on numeric estimates.•Categorical outcomes had high agreement for ballast water samples.•Uncertainty was higher for abundances below and close to the D-2 standard.</description><subject>Aquatic invasive species</subject><subject>Autotrophs</subject><subject>ballast water</subject><subject>Ballast water management</subject><subject>Ballast water treatment</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Compliance monitoring devices</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>Heterotrophs</subject><subject>microscopy</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>water management</subject><subject>water uptake</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFu1DAUhiMEokPhCCAvWZDh2Y6dREJCVUUBqRKb7i3Hfhk8SuLBLzNVuQG36IZbsOoBOAQnwdMZ2MLKsvW975ffXxTPOSw5cP16vVzjtBvttBQgxJJzJQEeFAsOrSobLeFhsQAJvKzqtj4pnhCtAUAKXj8uTqTSQnKhF8XtGREShWnF5s_INpj6mLLVIYs96-M2sTD54OwcdsjsZIcbCsQ87oJDykBinR0GSzO7tjMm5uK4GcK9YIxTmGPK7lf5eaLgcX9hMa3sFGikrL5PpfAVWbLTCtmvb985sDmyNwrubn_-GJ8Wj3o7ED47nqfF1cW7q_MP5eWn9x_Pzy5LV1VqLmXLPe-l9r5qUPUdB1SqaVEqV3sL0tUOUOiuqcB23vtaY9Vx50HpyjatPC1eHrSbFL9skWYzBnKYfzZh3JIRus4-aLj4H5SLGnRVZVQdUJciUcLebFIYbboxHMy-RrM2xxrNvkZzqDHPvThGbLsR_d-pP71l4O0BwLySXcBkyAXMS_choZuNj-EfEb8BeZG10w</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</creator><creator>Kydd, Jocelyn</creator><creator>Rozon, Robin M.</creator><creator>Bailey, Sarah A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-919X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1916-7017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm</title><author>Casas-Monroy, Oscar ; Kydd, Jocelyn ; Rozon, Robin M. ; Bailey, Sarah A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic invasive species</topic><topic>Autotrophs</topic><topic>ballast water</topic><topic>Ballast water management</topic><topic>Ballast water treatment</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Compliance monitoring devices</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>Heterotrophs</topic><topic>microscopy</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>water management</topic><topic>water uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kydd, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozon, Robin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</au><au>Kydd, Jocelyn</au><au>Rozon, Robin M.</au><au>Bailey, Sarah A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>317</volume><spage>115300</spage><epage>115300</epage><pages>115300-115300</pages><artnum>115300</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to <50 μm in minimum dimension (e.g., phytoplankton, including autotrophs, heterotrophs or mixotrophs), using field and laboratory tests. Comparisons were conducted on (treated) ballast water discharge samples collected across Canada during three consecutive years (2017–2019). During seven tests in 2019, paired ballast water uptake samples were also obtained, facilitating measurements before and after treatment was applied. Indicative analysis devices also were challenged with natural environmental samples containing different organism abundance levels, ranging from low (nominally <10 cells mL−1) to high (nominally >150 cells mL−1) during laboratory tests. While the indicative analysis devices examined during this research produced numeric estimates having weak correlations with the standard reference method, categorical outcomes (above/below the D-2 standard) had high agreement (89% or better) when assessing ballast water samples, but lower agreement (67% or poorer) during laboratory tests. There was a relatively high rate of false negative results measured by all devices during laboratory tests. Results provided by indicative analysis devices had higher uncertainty when organism abundances in ballast samples are below and close to the D-2 standards.
•Indicative devices had weak correlation with microscopy based on numeric estimates.•Categorical outcomes had high agreement for ballast water samples.•Uncertainty was higher for abundances below and close to the D-2 standard.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35623126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-919X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1916-7017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2022-09, Vol.317, p.115300-115300, Article 115300 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675580812 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Aquatic invasive species Autotrophs ballast water Ballast water management Ballast water treatment Canada compliance Compliance monitoring devices environmental management Heterotrophs microscopy Phytoplankton uncertainty water management water uptake |
title | Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A03%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20performance%20of%20four%20indicative%20analysis%20devices%20for%20ballast%20water%20compliance%20monitoring,%20considering%20organisms%20in%20the%20size%20range%20%E2%89%A510%20to%20%3C50%C2%A0%CE%BCm&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Casas-Monroy,%20Oscar&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=317&rft.spage=115300&rft.epage=115300&rft.pages=115300-115300&rft.artnum=115300&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671270644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671270644&rft_id=info:pmid/35623126&rfr_iscdi=true |