Loading…

Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm

To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2022-09, Vol.317, p.115300-115300, Article 115300
Main Authors: Casas-Monroy, Oscar, Kydd, Jocelyn, Rozon, Robin M., Bailey, Sarah A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893
container_end_page 115300
container_issue
container_start_page 115300
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 317
creator Casas-Monroy, Oscar
Kydd, Jocelyn
Rozon, Robin M.
Bailey, Sarah A.
description To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675580812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479722008738</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671270644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFu1DAUhiMEokPhCCAvWZDh2Y6dREJCVUUBqRKb7i3Hfhk8SuLBLzNVuQG36IZbsOoBOAQnwdMZ2MLKsvW975ffXxTPOSw5cP16vVzjtBvttBQgxJJzJQEeFAsOrSobLeFhsQAJvKzqtj4pnhCtAUAKXj8uTqTSQnKhF8XtGREShWnF5s_INpj6mLLVIYs96-M2sTD54OwcdsjsZIcbCsQ87oJDykBinR0GSzO7tjMm5uK4GcK9YIxTmGPK7lf5eaLgcX9hMa3sFGikrL5PpfAVWbLTCtmvb985sDmyNwrubn_-GJ8Wj3o7ED47nqfF1cW7q_MP5eWn9x_Pzy5LV1VqLmXLPe-l9r5qUPUdB1SqaVEqV3sL0tUOUOiuqcB23vtaY9Vx50HpyjatPC1eHrSbFL9skWYzBnKYfzZh3JIRus4-aLj4H5SLGnRVZVQdUJciUcLebFIYbboxHMy-RrM2xxrNvkZzqDHPvThGbLsR_d-pP71l4O0BwLySXcBkyAXMS_choZuNj-EfEb8BeZG10w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671270644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to &lt;50 μm</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Casas-Monroy, Oscar ; Kydd, Jocelyn ; Rozon, Robin M. ; Bailey, Sarah A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casas-Monroy, Oscar ; Kydd, Jocelyn ; Rozon, Robin M. ; Bailey, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><description>To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to &lt;50 μm in minimum dimension (e.g., phytoplankton, including autotrophs, heterotrophs or mixotrophs), using field and laboratory tests. Comparisons were conducted on (treated) ballast water discharge samples collected across Canada during three consecutive years (2017–2019). During seven tests in 2019, paired ballast water uptake samples were also obtained, facilitating measurements before and after treatment was applied. Indicative analysis devices also were challenged with natural environmental samples containing different organism abundance levels, ranging from low (nominally &lt;10 cells mL−1) to high (nominally &gt;150 cells mL−1) during laboratory tests. While the indicative analysis devices examined during this research produced numeric estimates having weak correlations with the standard reference method, categorical outcomes (above/below the D-2 standard) had high agreement (89% or better) when assessing ballast water samples, but lower agreement (67% or poorer) during laboratory tests. There was a relatively high rate of false negative results measured by all devices during laboratory tests. Results provided by indicative analysis devices had higher uncertainty when organism abundances in ballast samples are below and close to the D-2 standards. •Indicative devices had weak correlation with microscopy based on numeric estimates.•Categorical outcomes had high agreement for ballast water samples.•Uncertainty was higher for abundances below and close to the D-2 standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35623126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic invasive species ; Autotrophs ; ballast water ; Ballast water management ; Ballast water treatment ; Canada ; compliance ; Compliance monitoring devices ; environmental management ; Heterotrophs ; microscopy ; Phytoplankton ; uncertainty ; water management ; water uptake</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-09, Vol.317, p.115300-115300, Article 115300</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3635-919X ; 0000-0002-1916-7017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kydd, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozon, Robin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to &lt;50 μm</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to &lt;50 μm in minimum dimension (e.g., phytoplankton, including autotrophs, heterotrophs or mixotrophs), using field and laboratory tests. Comparisons were conducted on (treated) ballast water discharge samples collected across Canada during three consecutive years (2017–2019). During seven tests in 2019, paired ballast water uptake samples were also obtained, facilitating measurements before and after treatment was applied. Indicative analysis devices also were challenged with natural environmental samples containing different organism abundance levels, ranging from low (nominally &lt;10 cells mL−1) to high (nominally &gt;150 cells mL−1) during laboratory tests. While the indicative analysis devices examined during this research produced numeric estimates having weak correlations with the standard reference method, categorical outcomes (above/below the D-2 standard) had high agreement (89% or better) when assessing ballast water samples, but lower agreement (67% or poorer) during laboratory tests. There was a relatively high rate of false negative results measured by all devices during laboratory tests. Results provided by indicative analysis devices had higher uncertainty when organism abundances in ballast samples are below and close to the D-2 standards. •Indicative devices had weak correlation with microscopy based on numeric estimates.•Categorical outcomes had high agreement for ballast water samples.•Uncertainty was higher for abundances below and close to the D-2 standard.</description><subject>Aquatic invasive species</subject><subject>Autotrophs</subject><subject>ballast water</subject><subject>Ballast water management</subject><subject>Ballast water treatment</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Compliance monitoring devices</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>Heterotrophs</subject><subject>microscopy</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>water management</subject><subject>water uptake</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFu1DAUhiMEokPhCCAvWZDh2Y6dREJCVUUBqRKb7i3Hfhk8SuLBLzNVuQG36IZbsOoBOAQnwdMZ2MLKsvW975ffXxTPOSw5cP16vVzjtBvttBQgxJJzJQEeFAsOrSobLeFhsQAJvKzqtj4pnhCtAUAKXj8uTqTSQnKhF8XtGREShWnF5s_INpj6mLLVIYs96-M2sTD54OwcdsjsZIcbCsQ87oJDykBinR0GSzO7tjMm5uK4GcK9YIxTmGPK7lf5eaLgcX9hMa3sFGikrL5PpfAVWbLTCtmvb985sDmyNwrubn_-GJ8Wj3o7ED47nqfF1cW7q_MP5eWn9x_Pzy5LV1VqLmXLPe-l9r5qUPUdB1SqaVEqV3sL0tUOUOiuqcB23vtaY9Vx50HpyjatPC1eHrSbFL9skWYzBnKYfzZh3JIRus4-aLj4H5SLGnRVZVQdUJciUcLebFIYbboxHMy-RrM2xxrNvkZzqDHPvThGbLsR_d-pP71l4O0BwLySXcBkyAXMS_choZuNj-EfEb8BeZG10w</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</creator><creator>Kydd, Jocelyn</creator><creator>Rozon, Robin M.</creator><creator>Bailey, Sarah A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-919X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1916-7017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to &lt;50 μm</title><author>Casas-Monroy, Oscar ; Kydd, Jocelyn ; Rozon, Robin M. ; Bailey, Sarah A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic invasive species</topic><topic>Autotrophs</topic><topic>ballast water</topic><topic>Ballast water management</topic><topic>Ballast water treatment</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Compliance monitoring devices</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>Heterotrophs</topic><topic>microscopy</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>water management</topic><topic>water uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kydd, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozon, Robin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casas-Monroy, Oscar</au><au>Kydd, Jocelyn</au><au>Rozon, Robin M.</au><au>Bailey, Sarah A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to &lt;50 μm</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>317</volume><spage>115300</spage><epage>115300</epage><pages>115300-115300</pages><artnum>115300</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>To minimize the global transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced the standard in Regulation D-2 to limit the number of viable organisms in ballast water discharged by ships. To meet the standard, many ships are installing ballast water management systems. Concurrently, regulators are looking for indicative analysis devices able to assess compliance with Regulation D-2, producing rapid, accurate and reliable results while being easy to operate. The purpose of this research is to compare four indicative analysis devices against detailed microscopy for measuring the size class of organisms ≥10 to &lt;50 μm in minimum dimension (e.g., phytoplankton, including autotrophs, heterotrophs or mixotrophs), using field and laboratory tests. Comparisons were conducted on (treated) ballast water discharge samples collected across Canada during three consecutive years (2017–2019). During seven tests in 2019, paired ballast water uptake samples were also obtained, facilitating measurements before and after treatment was applied. Indicative analysis devices also were challenged with natural environmental samples containing different organism abundance levels, ranging from low (nominally &lt;10 cells mL−1) to high (nominally &gt;150 cells mL−1) during laboratory tests. While the indicative analysis devices examined during this research produced numeric estimates having weak correlations with the standard reference method, categorical outcomes (above/below the D-2 standard) had high agreement (89% or better) when assessing ballast water samples, but lower agreement (67% or poorer) during laboratory tests. There was a relatively high rate of false negative results measured by all devices during laboratory tests. Results provided by indicative analysis devices had higher uncertainty when organism abundances in ballast samples are below and close to the D-2 standards. •Indicative devices had weak correlation with microscopy based on numeric estimates.•Categorical outcomes had high agreement for ballast water samples.•Uncertainty was higher for abundances below and close to the D-2 standard.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35623126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-919X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1916-7017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2022-09, Vol.317, p.115300-115300, Article 115300
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675580812
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Aquatic invasive species
Autotrophs
ballast water
Ballast water management
Ballast water treatment
Canada
compliance
Compliance monitoring devices
environmental management
Heterotrophs
microscopy
Phytoplankton
uncertainty
water management
water uptake
title Assessing the performance of four indicative analysis devices for ballast water compliance monitoring, considering organisms in the size range ≥10 to <50 μm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A03%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20performance%20of%20four%20indicative%20analysis%20devices%20for%20ballast%20water%20compliance%20monitoring,%20considering%20organisms%20in%20the%20size%20range%20%E2%89%A510%20to%20%3C50%C2%A0%CE%BCm&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Casas-Monroy,%20Oscar&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=317&rft.spage=115300&rft.epage=115300&rft.pages=115300-115300&rft.artnum=115300&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671270644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-391d1f36dd48e5fb10e5589e35c7da03c7c0e26b840abddd76e4b1cd0564a893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671270644&rft_id=info:pmid/35623126&rfr_iscdi=true