Loading…

Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands

•Number of thought probes may effect measurement of mind wandering during a task.•Number of thought probes differentially effect mind wandering based on task demands.•More thought probes result in more mind wandering during a working memory task.•More thought probes result in less mind wandering dur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Consciousness and cognition 2022-08, Vol.103, p.103355-103355, Article 103355
Main Authors: Greve, Maren, Was, Christopher A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3
container_end_page 103355
container_issue
container_start_page 103355
container_title Consciousness and cognition
container_volume 103
creator Greve, Maren
Was, Christopher A.
description •Number of thought probes may effect measurement of mind wandering during a task.•Number of thought probes differentially effect mind wandering based on task demands.•More thought probes result in more mind wandering during a working memory task.•More thought probes result in less mind wandering during a video lecture.•Thought probes interact with attentional control demands, influence mind wandering. Mind wandering is a topic of great interest in many areas, but as with all psychological constructs, the interpretation of experimental results might depend on the way it is measured. A common way of measuring mind wandering in experiments is with self-report thought probes. An important question with this methodology is if the probe itself may be influencing participants’ mind wandering. Previous research suggests that multiple thought probes throughout a task may lead to less mind wandering. However, in some studies (e.g., Schubert et al, 2019) the probes occurred during a recorded lecture video and in the others (e.g., Seli et al, 2016) the probes occurred during a sustained attention to response task (SART). What is missing in the current literature is a comparison of the effect the number of thought probes has on mind wandering during a task that requires a greater deal of thought control throughout the task to perform well, such as a complex span task or working memory. As such, in the two experiments presented here we randomly assigned participants to one of four conditions. Conditions contained a minimum of one and a maximum of six probes. In the first experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered less during an operation span task, supporting our hypothesis. In the second experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered more during a video lecture. The results suggest that thought probes interact with attentional control demands to influence mind wandering.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2679702700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053810022000873</els_id><sourcerecordid>2679702700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoPPPTopWsebdJeBFl8wYoXBW9hNpkuWdpkTbqK_94s9eJFGJhhvgczHyGXjC4YZfJ6uzDBm7BZcMp5XglR10dkxmhLSy6UPD7MtSgbRukpOUtpSyltVFXPyPuz87b4Am8xOr8pdjGsMRWQq0hhHw0WoSuGvySLO_Q2FcEXMI7oR5enfMIYQ5_BIRPTOTnpoE948dvn5O3-7nX5WK5eHp6Wt6vScNmOJYCRbQUGTAWVVYbXQDk0iuVXVLWuaMasBNFxJhlHKa0Q1Ig1qLpRLaCYk6vJN1_-scc06sElg30PHsM-aS5Vq7IXpZlaTVQTQ0oRO72LboD4rRnVhyD1Vk9B6kOQegoyy24mGeY3Ph1GnYxDb9C6iGbUNrj_DX4AHkd-Pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679702700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Greve, Maren ; Was, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greve, Maren ; Was, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Number of thought probes may effect measurement of mind wandering during a task.•Number of thought probes differentially effect mind wandering based on task demands.•More thought probes result in more mind wandering during a working memory task.•More thought probes result in less mind wandering during a video lecture.•Thought probes interact with attentional control demands, influence mind wandering. Mind wandering is a topic of great interest in many areas, but as with all psychological constructs, the interpretation of experimental results might depend on the way it is measured. A common way of measuring mind wandering in experiments is with self-report thought probes. An important question with this methodology is if the probe itself may be influencing participants’ mind wandering. Previous research suggests that multiple thought probes throughout a task may lead to less mind wandering. However, in some studies (e.g., Schubert et al, 2019) the probes occurred during a recorded lecture video and in the others (e.g., Seli et al, 2016) the probes occurred during a sustained attention to response task (SART). What is missing in the current literature is a comparison of the effect the number of thought probes has on mind wandering during a task that requires a greater deal of thought control throughout the task to perform well, such as a complex span task or working memory. As such, in the two experiments presented here we randomly assigned participants to one of four conditions. Conditions contained a minimum of one and a maximum of six probes. In the first experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered less during an operation span task, supporting our hypothesis. In the second experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered more during a video lecture. The results suggest that thought probes interact with attentional control demands to influence mind wandering.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attention ; Mind wandering ; Operation span ; Thought probes ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Consciousness and cognition, 2022-08, Vol.103, p.103355-103355, Article 103355</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4778-7088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greve, Maren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Was, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands</title><title>Consciousness and cognition</title><description>•Number of thought probes may effect measurement of mind wandering during a task.•Number of thought probes differentially effect mind wandering based on task demands.•More thought probes result in more mind wandering during a working memory task.•More thought probes result in less mind wandering during a video lecture.•Thought probes interact with attentional control demands, influence mind wandering. Mind wandering is a topic of great interest in many areas, but as with all psychological constructs, the interpretation of experimental results might depend on the way it is measured. A common way of measuring mind wandering in experiments is with self-report thought probes. An important question with this methodology is if the probe itself may be influencing participants’ mind wandering. Previous research suggests that multiple thought probes throughout a task may lead to less mind wandering. However, in some studies (e.g., Schubert et al, 2019) the probes occurred during a recorded lecture video and in the others (e.g., Seli et al, 2016) the probes occurred during a sustained attention to response task (SART). What is missing in the current literature is a comparison of the effect the number of thought probes has on mind wandering during a task that requires a greater deal of thought control throughout the task to perform well, such as a complex span task or working memory. As such, in the two experiments presented here we randomly assigned participants to one of four conditions. Conditions contained a minimum of one and a maximum of six probes. In the first experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered less during an operation span task, supporting our hypothesis. In the second experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered more during a video lecture. The results suggest that thought probes interact with attentional control demands to influence mind wandering.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Mind wandering</subject><subject>Operation span</subject><subject>Thought probes</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>1053-8100</issn><issn>1090-2376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoPPPTopWsebdJeBFl8wYoXBW9hNpkuWdpkTbqK_94s9eJFGJhhvgczHyGXjC4YZfJ6uzDBm7BZcMp5XglR10dkxmhLSy6UPD7MtSgbRukpOUtpSyltVFXPyPuz87b4Am8xOr8pdjGsMRWQq0hhHw0WoSuGvySLO_Q2FcEXMI7oR5enfMIYQ5_BIRPTOTnpoE948dvn5O3-7nX5WK5eHp6Wt6vScNmOJYCRbQUGTAWVVYbXQDk0iuVXVLWuaMasBNFxJhlHKa0Q1Ig1qLpRLaCYk6vJN1_-scc06sElg30PHsM-aS5Vq7IXpZlaTVQTQ0oRO72LboD4rRnVhyD1Vk9B6kOQegoyy24mGeY3Ph1GnYxDb9C6iGbUNrj_DX4AHkd-Pg</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Greve, Maren</creator><creator>Was, Christopher A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-7088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands</title><author>Greve, Maren ; Was, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Mind wandering</topic><topic>Operation span</topic><topic>Thought probes</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greve, Maren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Was, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greve, Maren</au><au>Was, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands</atitle><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>103355</spage><epage>103355</epage><pages>103355-103355</pages><artnum>103355</artnum><issn>1053-8100</issn><eissn>1090-2376</eissn><abstract>•Number of thought probes may effect measurement of mind wandering during a task.•Number of thought probes differentially effect mind wandering based on task demands.•More thought probes result in more mind wandering during a working memory task.•More thought probes result in less mind wandering during a video lecture.•Thought probes interact with attentional control demands, influence mind wandering. Mind wandering is a topic of great interest in many areas, but as with all psychological constructs, the interpretation of experimental results might depend on the way it is measured. A common way of measuring mind wandering in experiments is with self-report thought probes. An important question with this methodology is if the probe itself may be influencing participants’ mind wandering. Previous research suggests that multiple thought probes throughout a task may lead to less mind wandering. However, in some studies (e.g., Schubert et al, 2019) the probes occurred during a recorded lecture video and in the others (e.g., Seli et al, 2016) the probes occurred during a sustained attention to response task (SART). What is missing in the current literature is a comparison of the effect the number of thought probes has on mind wandering during a task that requires a greater deal of thought control throughout the task to perform well, such as a complex span task or working memory. As such, in the two experiments presented here we randomly assigned participants to one of four conditions. Conditions contained a minimum of one and a maximum of six probes. In the first experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered less during an operation span task, supporting our hypothesis. In the second experiment, we found that participants who had received fewer probes mind wandered more during a video lecture. The results suggest that thought probes interact with attentional control demands to influence mind wandering.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-7088</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8100
ispartof Consciousness and cognition, 2022-08, Vol.103, p.103355-103355, Article 103355
issn 1053-8100
1090-2376
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2679702700
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Attention
Mind wandering
Operation span
Thought probes
Working memory
title Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mind%20wandering%20probes%20as%20a%20source%20of%20mind%20wandering%20depends%20on%20attention%20control%20demands&rft.jtitle=Consciousness%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Greve,%20Maren&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=103355&rft.epage=103355&rft.pages=103355-103355&rft.artnum=103355&rft.issn=1053-8100&rft.eissn=1090-2376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2679702700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-aac694acac4a4d7c25a02a87120274b404acd6a3f21612e66d330c3ba75879ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679702700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true