Loading…
Multisensor Hydrologic Assessment of a Freshwater Wetland
This article evaluates the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and visible/infrared (VIR) satellite imagery for mapping the extent of standing water in the Peace-Athabasca Delta during spring and summer of 1998. SAR images contain data about the geometric and electrical characteristics of the obje...
Saved in:
Published in: | Remote sensing of environment 2001-02, Vol.75 (2), p.162-173 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703 |
container_end_page | 173 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Remote sensing of environment |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Töyrä, Jessika Pietroniro, Alain Martz, Lawrence W. |
description | This article evaluates the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and visible/infrared (VIR) satellite imagery for mapping the extent of standing water in the Peace-Athabasca Delta during spring and summer of 1998. SAR images contain data about the geometric and electrical characteristics of the objects, while VIR images contain information about the reflectivity of objects. Radar pulses can also penetrate vegetation to some degree depending on the wavelength and vegetation thickness. It is hypothesized that since Radarsat and SPOT images contain complementary information, flood mapping will be more efficient when the two image types are used in combination. Radarsat SAR and SPOT multispectral imagery from May 1998 and July 1998 were used for the flood mapping. A Radarsat S2 image (27.5° incidence angle) was obtained for May 1998. To evaluate the incidence angle effect on flood mapping, a Radarsat S1 image (27.5° incidence angle) and a Radarsat S7 image (47.0° incidence angle) were obtained for July 1998. The Radarsat scenes were calibrated and filtered, and all imagery were orthorectified to minimize geometric distortion. A Mahalanobis distance algorithm was used to classify the SPOT scenes, the Radarsat scenes, and a combination of the two into open water, flooded vegetation, and nonflooded land. The results indicate that flood mapping in both spring and summer conditions has significantly higher accuracy when Radarsat and SPOT imagery are used in combination, rather than separately. However, it is important to use Radarsat imagery acquired at low incidence angles. Classification of the SPOT scene combined with the Radarsat S1 scene achieved significantly better results than those obtained when the SPOT scene was classified in combination with the Radarsat S7 scene. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00164-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26799457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425700001644</els_id><sourcerecordid>26799457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfQSgIog_VS5s06ZOM4Zww8UHFx5ClV410reY6Zd_ezA1f93Tc8fvfHT_GTjlcceDF9RNALlKRSXUBcAlxFLs9NuBalSkoEPts8I8csiOijwhJrfiAlQ_LpveELXUhma6q0DXdm3fJiAiJFtj2SVcnNpkEpPcf22NIXrFvbFsds4PaNoQn2zpkL5Pb5_E0nT3e3Y9Hs9SKDPrU1VrpQonKauVUWWdalq6qtHWl5FxnWueYcawLWwglwYmiBOSFnTvAfK4gH7Lzzd7P0H0tkXqz8OSwiT9gtySTFaoshVQ7Qa60EBzyCMoN6EJHFLA2n8EvbFgZDmZt1PwZNWtdBsD8GTUi5s62Byw529TBts7Tf1hLBTyL1M2Gwijl22Mw5Dy2Disf0PWm6vyOO78Sboiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17844103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multisensor Hydrologic Assessment of a Freshwater Wetland</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Töyrä, Jessika ; Pietroniro, Alain ; Martz, Lawrence W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Töyrä, Jessika ; Pietroniro, Alain ; Martz, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><description>This article evaluates the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and visible/infrared (VIR) satellite imagery for mapping the extent of standing water in the Peace-Athabasca Delta during spring and summer of 1998. SAR images contain data about the geometric and electrical characteristics of the objects, while VIR images contain information about the reflectivity of objects. Radar pulses can also penetrate vegetation to some degree depending on the wavelength and vegetation thickness. It is hypothesized that since Radarsat and SPOT images contain complementary information, flood mapping will be more efficient when the two image types are used in combination. Radarsat SAR and SPOT multispectral imagery from May 1998 and July 1998 were used for the flood mapping. A Radarsat S2 image (27.5° incidence angle) was obtained for May 1998. To evaluate the incidence angle effect on flood mapping, a Radarsat S1 image (27.5° incidence angle) and a Radarsat S7 image (47.0° incidence angle) were obtained for July 1998. The Radarsat scenes were calibrated and filtered, and all imagery were orthorectified to minimize geometric distortion. A Mahalanobis distance algorithm was used to classify the SPOT scenes, the Radarsat scenes, and a combination of the two into open water, flooded vegetation, and nonflooded land. The results indicate that flood mapping in both spring and summer conditions has significantly higher accuracy when Radarsat and SPOT imagery are used in combination, rather than separately. However, it is important to use Radarsat imagery acquired at low incidence angles. Classification of the SPOT scene combined with the Radarsat S1 scene achieved significantly better results than those obtained when the SPOT scene was classified in combination with the Radarsat S7 scene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00164-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSEEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; Canada, Alberta, Peace-Athabasca Delta ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Internal geophysics</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2001-02, Vol.75 (2), p.162-173</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=857012$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Töyrä, Jessika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietroniro, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martz, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><title>Multisensor Hydrologic Assessment of a Freshwater Wetland</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>This article evaluates the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and visible/infrared (VIR) satellite imagery for mapping the extent of standing water in the Peace-Athabasca Delta during spring and summer of 1998. SAR images contain data about the geometric and electrical characteristics of the objects, while VIR images contain information about the reflectivity of objects. Radar pulses can also penetrate vegetation to some degree depending on the wavelength and vegetation thickness. It is hypothesized that since Radarsat and SPOT images contain complementary information, flood mapping will be more efficient when the two image types are used in combination. Radarsat SAR and SPOT multispectral imagery from May 1998 and July 1998 were used for the flood mapping. A Radarsat S2 image (27.5° incidence angle) was obtained for May 1998. To evaluate the incidence angle effect on flood mapping, a Radarsat S1 image (27.5° incidence angle) and a Radarsat S7 image (47.0° incidence angle) were obtained for July 1998. The Radarsat scenes were calibrated and filtered, and all imagery were orthorectified to minimize geometric distortion. A Mahalanobis distance algorithm was used to classify the SPOT scenes, the Radarsat scenes, and a combination of the two into open water, flooded vegetation, and nonflooded land. The results indicate that flood mapping in both spring and summer conditions has significantly higher accuracy when Radarsat and SPOT imagery are used in combination, rather than separately. However, it is important to use Radarsat imagery acquired at low incidence angles. Classification of the SPOT scene combined with the Radarsat S1 scene achieved significantly better results than those obtained when the SPOT scene was classified in combination with the Radarsat S7 scene.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Canada, Alberta, Peace-Athabasca Delta</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfQSgIog_VS5s06ZOM4Zww8UHFx5ClV410reY6Zd_ezA1f93Tc8fvfHT_GTjlcceDF9RNALlKRSXUBcAlxFLs9NuBalSkoEPts8I8csiOijwhJrfiAlQ_LpveELXUhma6q0DXdm3fJiAiJFtj2SVcnNpkEpPcf22NIXrFvbFsds4PaNoQn2zpkL5Pb5_E0nT3e3Y9Hs9SKDPrU1VrpQonKauVUWWdalq6qtHWl5FxnWueYcawLWwglwYmiBOSFnTvAfK4gH7Lzzd7P0H0tkXqz8OSwiT9gtySTFaoshVQ7Qa60EBzyCMoN6EJHFLA2n8EvbFgZDmZt1PwZNWtdBsD8GTUi5s62Byw529TBts7Tf1hLBTyL1M2Gwijl22Mw5Dy2Disf0PWm6vyOO78Sboiw</recordid><startdate>20010201</startdate><enddate>20010201</enddate><creator>Töyrä, Jessika</creator><creator>Pietroniro, Alain</creator><creator>Martz, Lawrence W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010201</creationdate><title>Multisensor Hydrologic Assessment of a Freshwater Wetland</title><author>Töyrä, Jessika ; Pietroniro, Alain ; Martz, Lawrence W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Canada, Alberta, Peace-Athabasca Delta</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Töyrä, Jessika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietroniro, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martz, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Töyrä, Jessika</au><au>Pietroniro, Alain</au><au>Martz, Lawrence W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multisensor Hydrologic Assessment of a Freshwater Wetland</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2001-02-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>162-173</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><coden>RSEEA7</coden><abstract>This article evaluates the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and visible/infrared (VIR) satellite imagery for mapping the extent of standing water in the Peace-Athabasca Delta during spring and summer of 1998. SAR images contain data about the geometric and electrical characteristics of the objects, while VIR images contain information about the reflectivity of objects. Radar pulses can also penetrate vegetation to some degree depending on the wavelength and vegetation thickness. It is hypothesized that since Radarsat and SPOT images contain complementary information, flood mapping will be more efficient when the two image types are used in combination. Radarsat SAR and SPOT multispectral imagery from May 1998 and July 1998 were used for the flood mapping. A Radarsat S2 image (27.5° incidence angle) was obtained for May 1998. To evaluate the incidence angle effect on flood mapping, a Radarsat S1 image (27.5° incidence angle) and a Radarsat S7 image (47.0° incidence angle) were obtained for July 1998. The Radarsat scenes were calibrated and filtered, and all imagery were orthorectified to minimize geometric distortion. A Mahalanobis distance algorithm was used to classify the SPOT scenes, the Radarsat scenes, and a combination of the two into open water, flooded vegetation, and nonflooded land. The results indicate that flood mapping in both spring and summer conditions has significantly higher accuracy when Radarsat and SPOT imagery are used in combination, rather than separately. However, it is important to use Radarsat imagery acquired at low incidence angles. Classification of the SPOT scene combined with the Radarsat S1 scene achieved significantly better results than those obtained when the SPOT scene was classified in combination with the Radarsat S7 scene.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00164-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-4257 |
ispartof | Remote sensing of environment, 2001-02, Vol.75 (2), p.162-173 |
issn | 0034-4257 1879-0704 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26799457 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Applied geophysics Canada, Alberta, Peace-Athabasca Delta Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Internal geophysics |
title | Multisensor Hydrologic Assessment of a Freshwater Wetland |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multisensor%20Hydrologic%20Assessment%20of%20a%20Freshwater%20Wetland&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=T%C3%B6yr%C3%A4,%20Jessika&rft.date=2001-02-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=162-173&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft.coden=RSEEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00164-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26799457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-cf878674da87c79f2859cdd8ac951182883e21ef6a64750c4690e16abc0e3b703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17844103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |