Loading…

Sex, and Other Important Things: Tracking Ratios of Ecologically Significant Categories

The ratio of males and females in a population (the sex ratio) has been documented as an important factor in calibrating mating behaviors. This implies mental processes of attention, perception, categorization, and memory to obtain these environmental sex ratios. Although recent work has indicated t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. General 2022-11, Vol.151 (11), p.2720-2729
Main Authors: Brase, Gary L., Brandner, Jordann L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 2729
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2720
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. General
container_volume 151
creator Brase, Gary L.
Brandner, Jordann L.
description The ratio of males and females in a population (the sex ratio) has been documented as an important factor in calibrating mating behaviors. This implies mental processes of attention, perception, categorization, and memory to obtain these environmental sex ratios. Although recent work has indicated that sex ratio information can be processed quickly, accurately, and with little effort, there are still open questions about whether sex ratio information is cognitively privileged or prioritized, relative to other environmental information. The present experiments used an ensemble coding paradigm with larger, more complex matrices of stimuli and with a more feasible range of ratios (between 7:13 to 13:7) than many prior studies on sex ratio perception. Experiment 1 found that sex ratio estimates are sensitive to actual seen ratios (of a 4 × 5 matrix of faces, shown for about 500 ms), and that those judgments are more accurate than similarly presented ensemble coding judgments for vehicles (ratios of cars and truck) or for animals (ratios of cats and dogs). Experiment 2 found that sex ratio estimates and hair color ratio estimates are about equal in accuracy. These results together suggest that faces are a privileged content for frequency tracking, relative to other aspects of the environment. Further research can extend this work by disambiguating factors such as complexity and discriminability of various facial cues and the stage of processing at which those cues are being used.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xge0001227
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2680237525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2726977626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-a67bd7b662d72d382cbb5f756fab5e94d20ee6c8153e52fc44ca983ddd8a80a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtrGzEQAGBRGqjr9NJfIMgllG6ix-qxvRWTNgaDIXbpUcxqtWsl69VWkiH-913jQCCHzGVm4JthYBD6SskNJVzdPneOEEIZUx_QjFa8KtgUH9GMkEoWvCzFJ_Q5pccJEa7lDP3duOfvGIYGr_PORbzcjyFmGDLe7vzQpR94G8E-TSV-gOxDwqHFdzb0ofMW-v6IN74bfDs108wCsutC9C5doosW-uS-vOQ5-vPrbru4L1br38vFz1UBrNS5AKnqRtVSskaxhmtm61q0SsgWauGqsmHEOWk1FdwJ1tqytFBp3jSNBk1A8zm6Pu8dY_h3cCmbvU_W9T0MLhySYVITxpVgYqJXb-hjOMRhus4wxWSllGTyXSVVpWklyWnXt7OyMaQUXWvG6PcQj4YSc_qEef3EhG_OGEYwYzpaiNnb3iV7iNEN-WQNFdRQerqE8P8U64qd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679819605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex, and Other Important Things: Tracking Ratios of Ecologically Significant Categories</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Brase, Gary L. ; Brandner, Jordann L.</creator><contributor>Cowan, Nelson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brase, Gary L. ; Brandner, Jordann L. ; Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><description>The ratio of males and females in a population (the sex ratio) has been documented as an important factor in calibrating mating behaviors. This implies mental processes of attention, perception, categorization, and memory to obtain these environmental sex ratios. Although recent work has indicated that sex ratio information can be processed quickly, accurately, and with little effort, there are still open questions about whether sex ratio information is cognitively privileged or prioritized, relative to other environmental information. The present experiments used an ensemble coding paradigm with larger, more complex matrices of stimuli and with a more feasible range of ratios (between 7:13 to 13:7) than many prior studies on sex ratio perception. Experiment 1 found that sex ratio estimates are sensitive to actual seen ratios (of a 4 × 5 matrix of faces, shown for about 500 ms), and that those judgments are more accurate than similarly presented ensemble coding judgments for vehicles (ratios of cars and truck) or for animals (ratios of cats and dogs). Experiment 2 found that sex ratio estimates and hair color ratio estimates are about equal in accuracy. These results together suggest that faces are a privileged content for frequency tracking, relative to other aspects of the environment. Further research can extend this work by disambiguating factors such as complexity and discriminability of various facial cues and the stage of processing at which those cues are being used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xge0001227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Processes ; Environmental impact ; Experiments ; Female ; Human ; Male ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2022-11, Vol.151 (11), p.2720-2729</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9613-5529</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Cowan, Nelson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brase, Gary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandner, Jordann L.</creatorcontrib><title>Sex, and Other Important Things: Tracking Ratios of Ecologically Significant Categories</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><description>The ratio of males and females in a population (the sex ratio) has been documented as an important factor in calibrating mating behaviors. This implies mental processes of attention, perception, categorization, and memory to obtain these environmental sex ratios. Although recent work has indicated that sex ratio information can be processed quickly, accurately, and with little effort, there are still open questions about whether sex ratio information is cognitively privileged or prioritized, relative to other environmental information. The present experiments used an ensemble coding paradigm with larger, more complex matrices of stimuli and with a more feasible range of ratios (between 7:13 to 13:7) than many prior studies on sex ratio perception. Experiment 1 found that sex ratio estimates are sensitive to actual seen ratios (of a 4 × 5 matrix of faces, shown for about 500 ms), and that those judgments are more accurate than similarly presented ensemble coding judgments for vehicles (ratios of cars and truck) or for animals (ratios of cats and dogs). Experiment 2 found that sex ratio estimates and hair color ratio estimates are about equal in accuracy. These results together suggest that faces are a privileged content for frequency tracking, relative to other aspects of the environment. Further research can extend this work by disambiguating factors such as complexity and discriminability of various facial cues and the stage of processing at which those cues are being used.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtrGzEQAGBRGqjr9NJfIMgllG6ix-qxvRWTNgaDIXbpUcxqtWsl69VWkiH-913jQCCHzGVm4JthYBD6SskNJVzdPneOEEIZUx_QjFa8KtgUH9GMkEoWvCzFJ_Q5pccJEa7lDP3duOfvGIYGr_PORbzcjyFmGDLe7vzQpR94G8E-TSV-gOxDwqHFdzb0ofMW-v6IN74bfDs108wCsutC9C5doosW-uS-vOQ5-vPrbru4L1br38vFz1UBrNS5AKnqRtVSskaxhmtm61q0SsgWauGqsmHEOWk1FdwJ1tqytFBp3jSNBk1A8zm6Pu8dY_h3cCmbvU_W9T0MLhySYVITxpVgYqJXb-hjOMRhus4wxWSllGTyXSVVpWklyWnXt7OyMaQUXWvG6PcQj4YSc_qEef3EhG_OGEYwYzpaiNnb3iV7iNEN-WQNFdRQerqE8P8U64qd</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Brase, Gary L.</creator><creator>Brandner, Jordann L.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9613-5529</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Sex, and Other Important Things: Tracking Ratios of Ecologically Significant Categories</title><author>Brase, Gary L. ; Brandner, Jordann L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-a67bd7b662d72d382cbb5f756fab5e94d20ee6c8153e52fc44ca983ddd8a80a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brase, Gary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandner, Jordann L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brase, Gary L.</au><au>Brandner, Jordann L.</au><au>Cowan, Nelson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex, and Other Important Things: Tracking Ratios of Ecologically Significant Categories</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2720</spage><epage>2729</epage><pages>2720-2729</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><abstract>The ratio of males and females in a population (the sex ratio) has been documented as an important factor in calibrating mating behaviors. This implies mental processes of attention, perception, categorization, and memory to obtain these environmental sex ratios. Although recent work has indicated that sex ratio information can be processed quickly, accurately, and with little effort, there are still open questions about whether sex ratio information is cognitively privileged or prioritized, relative to other environmental information. The present experiments used an ensemble coding paradigm with larger, more complex matrices of stimuli and with a more feasible range of ratios (between 7:13 to 13:7) than many prior studies on sex ratio perception. Experiment 1 found that sex ratio estimates are sensitive to actual seen ratios (of a 4 × 5 matrix of faces, shown for about 500 ms), and that those judgments are more accurate than similarly presented ensemble coding judgments for vehicles (ratios of cars and truck) or for animals (ratios of cats and dogs). Experiment 2 found that sex ratio estimates and hair color ratio estimates are about equal in accuracy. These results together suggest that faces are a privileged content for frequency tracking, relative to other aspects of the environment. Further research can extend this work by disambiguating factors such as complexity and discriminability of various facial cues and the stage of processing at which those cues are being used.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/xge0001227</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9613-5529</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-3445
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2022-11, Vol.151 (11), p.2720-2729
issn 0096-3445
1939-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2680237525
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Animal reproduction
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Processes
Environmental impact
Experiments
Female
Human
Male
Tracking
title Sex, and Other Important Things: Tracking Ratios of Ecologically Significant Categories
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex,%20and%20Other%20Important%20Things:%20Tracking%20Ratios%20of%20Ecologically%20Significant%20Categories&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Brase,%20Gary%20L.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2720&rft.epage=2729&rft.pages=2720-2729&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xge0001227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2726977626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-a67bd7b662d72d382cbb5f756fab5e94d20ee6c8153e52fc44ca983ddd8a80a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679819605&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true