Correlation between overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity: a retrospective study

• Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2023-04, Vol.34 (4), p.867-875
• Main Authors: Huang, Ting-Xuan, Lo, Tsia-Shu, Tseng, Hsiao-Jung, Lin, Yi-Hao, Liang, Ching-Chung, Hsieh, Wu-Chiao
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bladder; Female; Gynecology; Hospitals; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Obstetrics; Original Article; Patients; Pelvic organ prolapse; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - complications; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - diagnosis; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - epidemiology; Urinary incontinence; Urination; Urodynamics; Urogenital system; Urology
• ISSN: 0937-3462; 1433-3023
• DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05274-7

Introduction The primary objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO) in female patients who were referred for urodynamic study (UDS) because of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The secondary objective is to determine the subjective and objective differences between female OAB patients with and without DO. Materials and methods All female patients who underwent UDS for LUTS between June 2016 and September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Personal history, medical history, physical examination, and validated questionnaires were collected. One-hour pad test and multichannel urodynamic study was performed. All statistical analyses were conducted by SAS 9.4. P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 4184 female patients underwent UDS because of LUTS between June 2016 and September 2019; 1524 patients were analyzed for OAB or DO. The occurrence of OAB was 36.4%. The overall incidence of DO in OAB patients was 15.5%; 9.5% of all patients had DO findings on UDS, and 4.6% were incidental findings. There were significant differences among mean age, parity, ICIQ-UI SF, OABSS, POPDI-6, and all UDS parameters (except for maximal urethral pressure and pressure transmission ratio) between patients with and without DO. In patients with DO, there were no significant differences among age, parity, and BMI with or without OAB symptoms. However, there were significant differences among mean OABSS, ICIQ-UI SF, UDI-6, POPDI-6, IIQ-7, and pad test. Conclusions Patients with DO are associated with older age, increased parity, greater urine leakage, and worse storage and micturition functions on UDS. Combinations of subjective and objective measurements are better predictive models for OAB patients.