Loading…

Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic

Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The liter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of transportation engineering 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.31-38
Main Authors: Khatib, Zaher, Chang, Kang-tsung, Ou, Yanmei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Journal of transportation engineering
container_volume 127
creator Khatib, Zaher
Chang, Kang-tsung
Ou, Yanmei
description Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26815708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>65934554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oXgh20X1nCRtVkFwzKkTRcGJ4k1IswQq3TqTFtm_N6V-gBfmIjkkz3mTPIQcIRwjpHgyGD9OpkMQjMUZFy8DCoBDpOIUBwyHW6SHGWdxwlm6TXo_2C7Z8_4toFwA7ZHz2XKtdO2jykbjlSo3vvDRa7Uy0WPtGl03zoSzVXRXLUxpFmFX1eajWJho7pS1hd4nO1aV3hx8rX3ydDmdT67j2_ur2WR8GysOvI6NpSxPKF3kCCCESjnkuUDNmbC5zg0zmDHQVitINRfITK40ojUjSDDnGeuToy537ar3xvhaLguvTVmqlakaL2k6wkTAKICHf8C3qnHha4FhnCZJBjRAZx2kXeW9M1auXbFUbiMRZGtXytaubLXJVpts7cpgV6JkGPqfu34V3vB7wc38YXoxg4BSAe3AdmLY1d_R_yZ_At-fhTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234255902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</title><source>American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals</source><creator>Khatib, Zaher ; Chang, Kang-tsung ; Ou, Yanmei</creator><creatorcontrib>Khatib, Zaher ; Chang, Kang-tsung ; Ou, Yanmei</creatorcontrib><description>Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-947X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JTPEDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Land use ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; Traffic ; Transportation ; Zoning</subject><ispartof>Journal of transportation engineering, 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.31-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers Jan/Feb 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khatib, Zaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kang-tsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Yanmei</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</title><title>Journal of transportation engineering</title><description>Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.</description><subject>Land use</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Traffic</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Zoning</subject><issn>0733-947X</issn><issn>1943-5436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oXgh20X1nCRtVkFwzKkTRcGJ4k1IswQq3TqTFtm_N6V-gBfmIjkkz3mTPIQcIRwjpHgyGD9OpkMQjMUZFy8DCoBDpOIUBwyHW6SHGWdxwlm6TXo_2C7Z8_4toFwA7ZHz2XKtdO2jykbjlSo3vvDRa7Uy0WPtGl03zoSzVXRXLUxpFmFX1eajWJho7pS1hd4nO1aV3hx8rX3ydDmdT67j2_ur2WR8GysOvI6NpSxPKF3kCCCESjnkuUDNmbC5zg0zmDHQVitINRfITK40ojUjSDDnGeuToy537ar3xvhaLguvTVmqlakaL2k6wkTAKICHf8C3qnHha4FhnCZJBjRAZx2kXeW9M1auXbFUbiMRZGtXytaubLXJVpts7cpgV6JkGPqfu34V3vB7wc38YXoxg4BSAe3AdmLY1d_R_yZ_At-fhTY</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Khatib, Zaher</creator><creator>Chang, Kang-tsung</creator><creator>Ou, Yanmei</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</title><author>Khatib, Zaher ; Chang, Kang-tsung ; Ou, Yanmei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Land use</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Traffic</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Zoning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khatib, Zaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kang-tsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Yanmei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of transportation engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khatib, Zaher</au><au>Chang, Kang-tsung</au><au>Ou, Yanmei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of transportation engineering</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>31-38</pages><issn>0733-947X</issn><eissn>1943-5436</eissn><coden>JTPEDI</coden><abstract>Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-947X
ispartof Journal of transportation engineering, 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.31-38
issn 0733-947X
1943-5436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26815708
source American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals
subjects Land use
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Traffic
Transportation
Zoning
title Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Analysis%20Zone%20Structures%20on%20Modeled%20Statewide%20Traffic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20transportation%20engineering&rft.au=Khatib,%20Zaher&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=31-38&rft.issn=0733-947X&rft.eissn=1943-5436&rft.coden=JTPEDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E65934554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234255902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true