Loading…
Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic
Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The liter...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of transportation engineering 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.31-38 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493 |
container_end_page | 38 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Journal of transportation engineering |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Khatib, Zaher Chang, Kang-tsung Ou, Yanmei |
description | Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31) |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26815708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>65934554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oXgh20X1nCRtVkFwzKkTRcGJ4k1IswQq3TqTFtm_N6V-gBfmIjkkz3mTPIQcIRwjpHgyGD9OpkMQjMUZFy8DCoBDpOIUBwyHW6SHGWdxwlm6TXo_2C7Z8_4toFwA7ZHz2XKtdO2jykbjlSo3vvDRa7Uy0WPtGl03zoSzVXRXLUxpFmFX1eajWJho7pS1hd4nO1aV3hx8rX3ydDmdT67j2_ur2WR8GysOvI6NpSxPKF3kCCCESjnkuUDNmbC5zg0zmDHQVitINRfITK40ojUjSDDnGeuToy537ar3xvhaLguvTVmqlakaL2k6wkTAKICHf8C3qnHha4FhnCZJBjRAZx2kXeW9M1auXbFUbiMRZGtXytaubLXJVpts7cpgV6JkGPqfu34V3vB7wc38YXoxg4BSAe3AdmLY1d_R_yZ_At-fhTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234255902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</title><source>American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals</source><creator>Khatib, Zaher ; Chang, Kang-tsung ; Ou, Yanmei</creator><creatorcontrib>Khatib, Zaher ; Chang, Kang-tsung ; Ou, Yanmei</creatorcontrib><description>Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-947X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JTPEDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Land use ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; Traffic ; Transportation ; Zoning</subject><ispartof>Journal of transportation engineering, 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.31-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers Jan/Feb 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khatib, Zaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kang-tsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Yanmei</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</title><title>Journal of transportation engineering</title><description>Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.</description><subject>Land use</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Traffic</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Zoning</subject><issn>0733-947X</issn><issn>1943-5436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oXgh20X1nCRtVkFwzKkTRcGJ4k1IswQq3TqTFtm_N6V-gBfmIjkkz3mTPIQcIRwjpHgyGD9OpkMQjMUZFy8DCoBDpOIUBwyHW6SHGWdxwlm6TXo_2C7Z8_4toFwA7ZHz2XKtdO2jykbjlSo3vvDRa7Uy0WPtGl03zoSzVXRXLUxpFmFX1eajWJho7pS1hd4nO1aV3hx8rX3ydDmdT67j2_ur2WR8GysOvI6NpSxPKF3kCCCESjnkuUDNmbC5zg0zmDHQVitINRfITK40ojUjSDDnGeuToy537ar3xvhaLguvTVmqlakaL2k6wkTAKICHf8C3qnHha4FhnCZJBjRAZx2kXeW9M1auXbFUbiMRZGtXytaubLXJVpts7cpgV6JkGPqfu34V3vB7wc38YXoxg4BSAe3AdmLY1d_R_yZ_At-fhTY</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Khatib, Zaher</creator><creator>Chang, Kang-tsung</creator><creator>Ou, Yanmei</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</title><author>Khatib, Zaher ; Chang, Kang-tsung ; Ou, Yanmei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Land use</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Traffic</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Zoning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khatib, Zaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kang-tsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Yanmei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of transportation engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khatib, Zaher</au><au>Chang, Kang-tsung</au><au>Ou, Yanmei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of transportation engineering</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>31-38</pages><issn>0733-947X</issn><eissn>1943-5436</eissn><coden>JTPEDI</coden><abstract>Because a statewide transportation planning model covers a much larger area than an urban transportation planning model, land-use inventories and a household survey, which are often used to collect socioeconomic and traffic data for a UTP model, are prohibitively expensive for a STP model. The literature suggests alternatives of using the geography of census such as census tracts or block groups as Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and using decennial Census for the socioeconomic data needed for statewide traffic demand modeling. The use of these alternatives raises new research questions for transportation planners. Which level of the census geography is better for statewide planning? Where should the centroids of TAZs be located given that the TAZs are heterogeneous in land-use activities? How much difference will the change of TAZ size and centroid location make in the results? Would the difference justify the extra effort in using more detailed TAZs and network? The primary purpose of this study is to determine how different TAZ structures and different roadway network details affect the ability of a STP model to replicate annual average daily traffic counts on the network. Idaho statewide traffic demand model is adopted as a case study. Results of this study can provide transportation planners a quantitative guide in selecting a zoning system for their statewide traffic demand models.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-947X |
ispartof | Journal of transportation engineering, 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.31-38 |
issn | 0733-947X 1943-5436 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26815708 |
source | American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals |
subjects | Land use TECHNICAL PAPERS Traffic Transportation Zoning |
title | Impacts of Analysis Zone Structures on Modeled Statewide Traffic |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Analysis%20Zone%20Structures%20on%20Modeled%20Statewide%20Traffic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20transportation%20engineering&rft.au=Khatib,%20Zaher&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=31-38&rft.issn=0733-947X&rft.eissn=1943-5436&rft.coden=JTPEDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:1(31)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E65934554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-ef23b522db10077a640bb71c437fbcbe3e1930cfca06c4713ebac11fe8051b493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234255902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |