A generative adversarial inpainting network to enhance prediction of periodontal clinical attachment level

• Published in: Journal of dentistry 2022-08, Vol.123, p.104211-104211, Article 104211
• Main Authors: Kearney, Vasant P., Yansane, Alfa-Ibrahim M., Brandon, Ryan G., Vaderhobli, Ram, Lin, Guo-Hao, Hekmatian, Hamid, Deng, Wenxiang, Joshi, Neha, Bhandari, Harsh, Sadat, Ali S., White, Joel M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Anatomy; Artificial intelligence; Artificial neural networks; Attachment; Data integrity; Deep learning; Dentistry; Diagnosis; Error analysis; Generative adversarial networks; Generators; Gum disease; Hypotheses; Hypothesis testing; Machine learning; Medical imaging; Neural networks; Patients; Periodontal disease; Periodontal diseases; Periodontium; Predictions; Radiation; Realism; Statistical analysis
• ISSN: 0300-5712; 1879-176X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104211

ObjectivesBone level as measured by clinical attachment levels (CAL) are critical findings that determine the diagnosis of periodontal disease. Deep learning algorithms are being used to determine CAL which aid in the diagnosis of periodontal disease. However, the limited field-of-view of bitewing x-rays poses a challenge for convolutional neural networks (CNN) because out-of-view anatomy cannot be directly considered. This study presents an inpainting algorithm using generative adversarial networks (GANs) coupled with partial convolutions to predict out-of-view anatomy to enhance CAL prediction accuracy.MethodsRetrospective purposive sampling of cases with healthy periodontium and diseased periodontium with bitewing and periapical radiographs and clinician recorded CAL were utilized. Data utilized was from July 1, 2016 through January 30, 2020. 80,326 images were used for training, 12,901 images were used for validation and 10,687 images were used to compare non-inpainted methods to inpainted methods for CAL predictions. Statistical analyses were mean bias error (MBE), mean absolute error (MAE) and Dunn's pairwise test comparing CAL at p=0.05.ResultsComparator p-values demonstrated statistically significant improvement in CAL prediction accuracy between corresponding inpainted and non-inpainted methods with MAE of 1.04mm and 1.50mm respectively. The Dunn's pairwise test indicated statistically significant improvement in CAL prediction accuracy between inpainted methods compared to their non-inpainted counterparts, with the best performing methods achieving a Dunn's pairwise value of -63.89.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the superiority of using a generative adversarial inpainting network with partial convolutions to predict CAL from bitewing and periapical images.Clinical significanceArtificial intelligence was developed and utilized to predict clinical attachment level compared to clinical measurements. A generative adversarial inpainting network with partial convolutions was developed, tested and validated to predict clinical attachment level. The inpainting approach was found to be superior to non-inpainted methods and within the 1mm clinician-determined measurement standard.