Loading…

A comparative study of dietary fiber content, In vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non–pigmented traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.)

[Display omitted] •Dietary fiber (DF) content is higher in pigmented rice than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower starch digestibility than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower expected glycemic index values than non-pigmented rice.•Climatic variations of rice cultivation do not af...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food research international 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111389-111389, Article 111389
Main Authors: Rebeira, S.P., Prasantha, B.D.R., Jayatilake, D.V., Dunuwila, G.R., Piyasiri, C.H., Herath, H.M.K.W.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33
container_end_page 111389
container_issue
container_start_page 111389
container_title Food research international
container_volume 157
creator Rebeira, S.P.
Prasantha, B.D.R.
Jayatilake, D.V.
Dunuwila, G.R.
Piyasiri, C.H.
Herath, H.M.K.W.P.
description [Display omitted] •Dietary fiber (DF) content is higher in pigmented rice than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower starch digestibility than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower expected glycemic index values than non-pigmented rice.•Climatic variations of rice cultivation do not affect the DF content of rice.•There is no difference between the DF content of traditional and improved rice. Thirty-two traditional and newly improved pigmented and non-pigmented rice varieties were evaluated for their eating and cooking quality and dietary fiber (DF) content. Seasonal variability of DF content, in–vitro starch digestion rate (DR) and expected glycemic index (eGI) were evaluated using selected representative samples. Rice varieties were categorized either high or intermediate amylose content but with hard, medium or soft gel consistency. Average insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) content ranged between 1.13–6.76% and 0.03–1.00%, respectively. Pigmented rice reported significantly higher IDF content compared to non–pigmented rice and also showed a significant statistical correlation (r > 0.56, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111389
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681818367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096399692200446X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2681818367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtqHDEQhpsQQya2jxDQ0oF0R1I_tQrG5GEY8CZeCz2qxzXplsaSZmC8yh1yIZ_FJ4lmxpBl0EJQ9f0_VfUXxQdGK0ZZ93ldjd7bALHilPOKMVYP4k2xYENflz1r2rfFgoquLoXoxLvifYxrSmnX9mJRPF8T4-eNCirhDkhMW7snfiQWIamwJyNqCBlxCVz6RG4d2WEKPoMqmIeMrSAm1Dhh2hPlbEb9L3Qr8rhVx5p5yN4mQcDMmXjw3uBqzm5gjwLn3cvvP_9qKSiLCb1T07GP8yb4XW4ENECu7sL-SZF4GFeRZfXxojgb1RTh8vU_L-6_ff1586Nc3n2_vblelqZueCq11qIBzYUAy8DaztJG66ZngtdguRGtasbR9LVoOkMHsEIbMdjWKCYYh7o-L65Ovnmax21eWs4YDUyTcuC3UfJuYPnVXZ_R9oSa4GMMMMpNwDlfUzIqD4nJtXxNTB4Sk6fEsu7LSQd5jx1CkNEgOAMWA5gkrcf_OPwF7F2o1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681818367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of dietary fiber content, In vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non–pigmented traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rebeira, S.P. ; Prasantha, B.D.R. ; Jayatilake, D.V. ; Dunuwila, G.R. ; Piyasiri, C.H. ; Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rebeira, S.P. ; Prasantha, B.D.R. ; Jayatilake, D.V. ; Dunuwila, G.R. ; Piyasiri, C.H. ; Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Dietary fiber (DF) content is higher in pigmented rice than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower starch digestibility than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower expected glycemic index values than non-pigmented rice.•Climatic variations of rice cultivation do not affect the DF content of rice.•There is no difference between the DF content of traditional and improved rice. Thirty-two traditional and newly improved pigmented and non-pigmented rice varieties were evaluated for their eating and cooking quality and dietary fiber (DF) content. Seasonal variability of DF content, in–vitro starch digestion rate (DR) and expected glycemic index (eGI) were evaluated using selected representative samples. Rice varieties were categorized either high or intermediate amylose content but with hard, medium or soft gel consistency. Average insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) content ranged between 1.13–6.76% and 0.03–1.00%, respectively. Pigmented rice reported significantly higher IDF content compared to non–pigmented rice and also showed a significant statistical correlation (r &gt; 0.56, P &lt; 0.01) between IDF and pigmentation. There was no seasonal variation observed in rice DF content between two cropping seasons. Pigmented rice varieties showed significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) starch digestibility and glycemic index values (DR:58.8–66.5; eGI:71.9–76.2) than non–pigmented rice (DR:69.1–71.5; eGI:77.6–79.0). Pigmented rice showed significantly higher negative correlation (r &gt; -0.68, P &lt; 0.01) with DR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cooking quality ; Dietary fiber ; Glycemic index ; Pigmented rice ; Starch digestibility</subject><ispartof>Food research international, 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111389-111389, Article 111389</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3134-0756</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rebeira, S.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasantha, B.D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayatilake, D.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunuwila, G.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piyasiri, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of dietary fiber content, In vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non–pigmented traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.)</title><title>Food research international</title><description>[Display omitted] •Dietary fiber (DF) content is higher in pigmented rice than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower starch digestibility than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower expected glycemic index values than non-pigmented rice.•Climatic variations of rice cultivation do not affect the DF content of rice.•There is no difference between the DF content of traditional and improved rice. Thirty-two traditional and newly improved pigmented and non-pigmented rice varieties were evaluated for their eating and cooking quality and dietary fiber (DF) content. Seasonal variability of DF content, in–vitro starch digestion rate (DR) and expected glycemic index (eGI) were evaluated using selected representative samples. Rice varieties were categorized either high or intermediate amylose content but with hard, medium or soft gel consistency. Average insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) content ranged between 1.13–6.76% and 0.03–1.00%, respectively. Pigmented rice reported significantly higher IDF content compared to non–pigmented rice and also showed a significant statistical correlation (r &gt; 0.56, P &lt; 0.01) between IDF and pigmentation. There was no seasonal variation observed in rice DF content between two cropping seasons. Pigmented rice varieties showed significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) starch digestibility and glycemic index values (DR:58.8–66.5; eGI:71.9–76.2) than non–pigmented rice (DR:69.1–71.5; eGI:77.6–79.0). Pigmented rice showed significantly higher negative correlation (r &gt; -0.68, P &lt; 0.01) with DR.</description><subject>Cooking quality</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Glycemic index</subject><subject>Pigmented rice</subject><subject>Starch digestibility</subject><issn>0963-9969</issn><issn>1873-7145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtqHDEQhpsQQya2jxDQ0oF0R1I_tQrG5GEY8CZeCz2qxzXplsaSZmC8yh1yIZ_FJ4lmxpBl0EJQ9f0_VfUXxQdGK0ZZ93ldjd7bALHilPOKMVYP4k2xYENflz1r2rfFgoquLoXoxLvifYxrSmnX9mJRPF8T4-eNCirhDkhMW7snfiQWIamwJyNqCBlxCVz6RG4d2WEKPoMqmIeMrSAm1Dhh2hPlbEb9L3Qr8rhVx5p5yN4mQcDMmXjw3uBqzm5gjwLn3cvvP_9qKSiLCb1T07GP8yb4XW4ENECu7sL-SZF4GFeRZfXxojgb1RTh8vU_L-6_ff1586Nc3n2_vblelqZueCq11qIBzYUAy8DaztJG66ZngtdguRGtasbR9LVoOkMHsEIbMdjWKCYYh7o-L65Ovnmax21eWs4YDUyTcuC3UfJuYPnVXZ_R9oSa4GMMMMpNwDlfUzIqD4nJtXxNTB4Sk6fEsu7LSQd5jx1CkNEgOAMWA5gkrcf_OPwF7F2o1w</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Rebeira, S.P.</creator><creator>Prasantha, B.D.R.</creator><creator>Jayatilake, D.V.</creator><creator>Dunuwila, G.R.</creator><creator>Piyasiri, C.H.</creator><creator>Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-0756</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>A comparative study of dietary fiber content, In vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non–pigmented traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.)</title><author>Rebeira, S.P. ; Prasantha, B.D.R. ; Jayatilake, D.V. ; Dunuwila, G.R. ; Piyasiri, C.H. ; Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cooking quality</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Glycemic index</topic><topic>Pigmented rice</topic><topic>Starch digestibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rebeira, S.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasantha, B.D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayatilake, D.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunuwila, G.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piyasiri, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rebeira, S.P.</au><au>Prasantha, B.D.R.</au><au>Jayatilake, D.V.</au><au>Dunuwila, G.R.</au><au>Piyasiri, C.H.</au><au>Herath, H.M.K.W.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of dietary fiber content, In vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non–pigmented traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.)</atitle><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>111389</spage><epage>111389</epage><pages>111389-111389</pages><artnum>111389</artnum><issn>0963-9969</issn><eissn>1873-7145</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Dietary fiber (DF) content is higher in pigmented rice than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower starch digestibility than non-pigmented rice.•Pigmented rice has lower expected glycemic index values than non-pigmented rice.•Climatic variations of rice cultivation do not affect the DF content of rice.•There is no difference between the DF content of traditional and improved rice. Thirty-two traditional and newly improved pigmented and non-pigmented rice varieties were evaluated for their eating and cooking quality and dietary fiber (DF) content. Seasonal variability of DF content, in–vitro starch digestion rate (DR) and expected glycemic index (eGI) were evaluated using selected representative samples. Rice varieties were categorized either high or intermediate amylose content but with hard, medium or soft gel consistency. Average insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) content ranged between 1.13–6.76% and 0.03–1.00%, respectively. Pigmented rice reported significantly higher IDF content compared to non–pigmented rice and also showed a significant statistical correlation (r &gt; 0.56, P &lt; 0.01) between IDF and pigmentation. There was no seasonal variation observed in rice DF content between two cropping seasons. Pigmented rice varieties showed significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) starch digestibility and glycemic index values (DR:58.8–66.5; eGI:71.9–76.2) than non–pigmented rice (DR:69.1–71.5; eGI:77.6–79.0). Pigmented rice showed significantly higher negative correlation (r &gt; -0.68, P &lt; 0.01) with DR.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111389</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-0756</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-9969
ispartof Food research international, 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111389-111389, Article 111389
issn 0963-9969
1873-7145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681818367
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Cooking quality
Dietary fiber
Glycemic index
Pigmented rice
Starch digestibility
title A comparative study of dietary fiber content, In vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non–pigmented traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A15%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20dietary%20fiber%20content,%20In%20vitro%20starch%20digestibility%20and%20cooking%20quality%20characteristics%20of%20pigmented%20and%20non%E2%80%93pigmented%20traditional%20and%20improved%20rice%20(Oryza%20sativa%20L.)&rft.jtitle=Food%20research%20international&rft.au=Rebeira,%20S.P.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=111389&rft.epage=111389&rft.pages=111389-111389&rft.artnum=111389&rft.issn=0963-9969&rft.eissn=1873-7145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111389&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681818367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-bbb94eb299ed1edd6d04bb471923ed2c95a4ffc73946c08ed9bc98d5ca1912e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681818367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true