Loading…

Application of the Validated Social Assessment Instrument for Liver Transplantation Candidates

The use of appropriate instruments for social assessment in health aims at both the participation of the subject and effectiveness in resolving demands. The objective of this study was to characterize the population assessed by the Validated Social Assessment Instrument and its implications; a descr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transplantation proceedings 2022-06, Vol.54 (5), p.1290-1294
Main Authors: de Almeida Serrano, Luzia Cristina, Pereira, Vinícius Araújo, de Jesus, Giovanni Amadeu, Virches, Adriano, da Silva, Renato Ferreira, Duca, William José, da Silva, Rita De Cássia Martins Alves, Júnior, Paulo César Arroyo, Sciarra, Adília Maria Pires, Rondina, Ana Maria Ferreira, Lemes, Jemima Domingos, Bento, Giuliano Ancelmo, Myazaki, Eliane Tiemi
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of appropriate instruments for social assessment in health aims at both the participation of the subject and effectiveness in resolving demands. The objective of this study was to characterize the population assessed by the Validated Social Assessment Instrument and its implications; a descriptive, documental study with participant and dialectical observation. The data survey were taken from the social assessments applied from July 2020 to June 2021 in a transplant center in northwestern São Paulo state in Brazil. Descriptive statistics were performed. The 65 social evaluations of candidates for liver transplantation (LTx) have presented the following sociodemographic characteristics: male sex (n = 47; 72.3%); mean age of 55.05 years (range: 24-75 years old); with a partner (n = 50; 76.9%); low education level (n = 30; 46.2%); and coming from the state of São Paulo (n = 54; 83.1). Of those evaluated, 48 candidates (74%) were professionally inactive and 37 (56.9%) received assistance or social security benefits; 62 (95.4%) had a family caregiver; 61 (93.9%) had a resolutive compliance family response; 57 (87.7%) had facilitated accessibility; 59 (90.8%) met satisfactory housing standards; and 60 (92.3%) had full acceptance for LTx. The 65 candidates’ (100%) social opinions were favorable, and 21 (32.3%) had some limitations and required further assistance. All of them received basic and specific social orientations, and 25 (38.5%) required social referrals. The variables have allowed a view at the totality of the social being in addition to widening the subject's participation in order to identify the real demands and facilitate the monitoring of actions, thus contributing for favorable conditions for treatment.
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.067