Loading…
Attainments during the COVID-19: a comparative survey study on ideal anatomy education from the students’ perspective
Purpose Anatomy, one of the cornerstone branches of medical education, is one of the rare areas, where the traditional method remains the most efficient education method despite technological developments. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it impossible for the traditional method to continue a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) 2022-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1063-1069 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923 |
container_end_page | 1069 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1063 |
container_title | Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Ortadeveci, Abdullah Ermez, Merve Nur Oz, Semih Ozden, Hilmi |
description | Purpose
Anatomy, one of the cornerstone branches of medical education, is one of the rare areas, where the traditional method remains the most efficient education method despite technological developments. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it impossible for the traditional method to continue and has enabled the integration of different distance learning methods into anatomy education. The aim of our study is to perform comparative evaluation of three education methods (traditional, asynchronous online, synchronous online) from the students’ perspective.
Methods
In our study, a questionnaire form was sent to Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine students (
n
= 168) via Google forms. The students were asked to rank the anatomy education types from the most appropriate to the least appropriate in the proposals. The questionnaire consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions in addition to 15 proposals questioning demographic information, student autonomy, efficiency, and preference.
Results
According to the results obtained, the students stated that the most efficient method (in terms of both theoretical "50%" and practical "55.4%") is the traditional method. In addition, when it comes to preference, students who preferred one of the distance online education types (asynchronous or synchronous) for theoretical anatomy constituted the majority (59.5%). The traditional method was rated as the least appropriate in terms of accessing course resources (42.3%).
Conclusions
According to our study, while face-to-face education is still indispensable for the practical part of the ideal anatomy education, the theoretical part can be carried out remotely by strengthening it with some activities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00276-022-02978-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684098032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2693174155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuAGzfVnPSSxN0w3gYGZqNuQ9qm2mF6MUlHuvM1fD2fxHQqKC5chBMO3_8R8iN0CuQCCGGXlhDKkoBQ6o9gPBB7aAKUiYDHwPZ_3Q_RkbVrQkgMwCfobeacKutK187ivDNl_Yzdi8bz1dPiOgBxhRXOmqpVRrlyq7HtzFb32Lou73FT4zLXaoNVrVxT9VjnXeY5vy9MU-1EAznIP98_cKuNbXU2iI7RQaE2Vp98zyl6vL15mN8Hy9XdYj5bBlkYCxewBEQuIE0FoyIFnvJMgUrDNKY6YirlqkiAKxJSAKARo7QgIiEq5FkRaUHDKTofva1pXjttnaxKm-nNRtW66aykCY-I4F7g0bM_6LrpTO1f5ykRAosgjj1FRyozjbVGF7I1ZaVML4HIoQs5diF9F3LXhRQ-FI4h2w4_rM2P-p_UFxrZjWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693174155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attainments during the COVID-19: a comparative survey study on ideal anatomy education from the students’ perspective</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ortadeveci, Abdullah ; Ermez, Merve Nur ; Oz, Semih ; Ozden, Hilmi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ortadeveci, Abdullah ; Ermez, Merve Nur ; Oz, Semih ; Ozden, Hilmi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Anatomy, one of the cornerstone branches of medical education, is one of the rare areas, where the traditional method remains the most efficient education method despite technological developments. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it impossible for the traditional method to continue and has enabled the integration of different distance learning methods into anatomy education. The aim of our study is to perform comparative evaluation of three education methods (traditional, asynchronous online, synchronous online) from the students’ perspective.
Methods
In our study, a questionnaire form was sent to Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine students (
n
= 168) via Google forms. The students were asked to rank the anatomy education types from the most appropriate to the least appropriate in the proposals. The questionnaire consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions in addition to 15 proposals questioning demographic information, student autonomy, efficiency, and preference.
Results
According to the results obtained, the students stated that the most efficient method (in terms of both theoretical "50%" and practical "55.4%") is the traditional method. In addition, when it comes to preference, students who preferred one of the distance online education types (asynchronous or synchronous) for theoretical anatomy constituted the majority (59.5%). The traditional method was rated as the least appropriate in terms of accessing course resources (42.3%).
Conclusions
According to our study, while face-to-face education is still indispensable for the practical part of the ideal anatomy education, the theoretical part can be carried out remotely by strengthening it with some activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1279-8517</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0930-1038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1279-8517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00276-022-02978-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Education ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Multiple choice ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Questionnaires ; Radiology ; Students ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.), 2022-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1063-1069</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6575-5699</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ortadeveci, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ermez, Merve Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oz, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozden, Hilmi</creatorcontrib><title>Attainments during the COVID-19: a comparative survey study on ideal anatomy education from the students’ perspective</title><title>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Surg Radiol Anat</addtitle><description>Purpose
Anatomy, one of the cornerstone branches of medical education, is one of the rare areas, where the traditional method remains the most efficient education method despite technological developments. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it impossible for the traditional method to continue and has enabled the integration of different distance learning methods into anatomy education. The aim of our study is to perform comparative evaluation of three education methods (traditional, asynchronous online, synchronous online) from the students’ perspective.
Methods
In our study, a questionnaire form was sent to Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine students (
n
= 168) via Google forms. The students were asked to rank the anatomy education types from the most appropriate to the least appropriate in the proposals. The questionnaire consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions in addition to 15 proposals questioning demographic information, student autonomy, efficiency, and preference.
Results
According to the results obtained, the students stated that the most efficient method (in terms of both theoretical "50%" and practical "55.4%") is the traditional method. In addition, when it comes to preference, students who preferred one of the distance online education types (asynchronous or synchronous) for theoretical anatomy constituted the majority (59.5%). The traditional method was rated as the least appropriate in terms of accessing course resources (42.3%).
Conclusions
According to our study, while face-to-face education is still indispensable for the practical part of the ideal anatomy education, the theoretical part can be carried out remotely by strengthening it with some activities.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1279-8517</issn><issn>0930-1038</issn><issn>1279-8517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuAGzfVnPSSxN0w3gYGZqNuQ9qm2mF6MUlHuvM1fD2fxHQqKC5chBMO3_8R8iN0CuQCCGGXlhDKkoBQ6o9gPBB7aAKUiYDHwPZ_3Q_RkbVrQkgMwCfobeacKutK187ivDNl_Yzdi8bz1dPiOgBxhRXOmqpVRrlyq7HtzFb32Lou73FT4zLXaoNVrVxT9VjnXeY5vy9MU-1EAznIP98_cKuNbXU2iI7RQaE2Vp98zyl6vL15mN8Hy9XdYj5bBlkYCxewBEQuIE0FoyIFnvJMgUrDNKY6YirlqkiAKxJSAKARo7QgIiEq5FkRaUHDKTofva1pXjttnaxKm-nNRtW66aykCY-I4F7g0bM_6LrpTO1f5ykRAosgjj1FRyozjbVGF7I1ZaVML4HIoQs5diF9F3LXhRQ-FI4h2w4_rM2P-p_UFxrZjWA</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Ortadeveci, Abdullah</creator><creator>Ermez, Merve Nur</creator><creator>Oz, Semih</creator><creator>Ozden, Hilmi</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6575-5699</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Attainments during the COVID-19: a comparative survey study on ideal anatomy education from the students’ perspective</title><author>Ortadeveci, Abdullah ; Ermez, Merve Nur ; Oz, Semih ; Ozden, Hilmi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ortadeveci, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ermez, Merve Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oz, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozden, Hilmi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ortadeveci, Abdullah</au><au>Ermez, Merve Nur</au><au>Oz, Semih</au><au>Ozden, Hilmi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attainments during the COVID-19: a comparative survey study on ideal anatomy education from the students’ perspective</atitle><jtitle>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.)</jtitle><stitle>Surg Radiol Anat</stitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1063</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1063-1069</pages><issn>1279-8517</issn><issn>0930-1038</issn><eissn>1279-8517</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Anatomy, one of the cornerstone branches of medical education, is one of the rare areas, where the traditional method remains the most efficient education method despite technological developments. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it impossible for the traditional method to continue and has enabled the integration of different distance learning methods into anatomy education. The aim of our study is to perform comparative evaluation of three education methods (traditional, asynchronous online, synchronous online) from the students’ perspective.
Methods
In our study, a questionnaire form was sent to Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine students (
n
= 168) via Google forms. The students were asked to rank the anatomy education types from the most appropriate to the least appropriate in the proposals. The questionnaire consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions in addition to 15 proposals questioning demographic information, student autonomy, efficiency, and preference.
Results
According to the results obtained, the students stated that the most efficient method (in terms of both theoretical "50%" and practical "55.4%") is the traditional method. In addition, when it comes to preference, students who preferred one of the distance online education types (asynchronous or synchronous) for theoretical anatomy constituted the majority (59.5%). The traditional method was rated as the least appropriate in terms of accessing course resources (42.3%).
Conclusions
According to our study, while face-to-face education is still indispensable for the practical part of the ideal anatomy education, the theoretical part can be carried out remotely by strengthening it with some activities.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s00276-022-02978-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6575-5699</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1279-8517 |
ispartof | Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.), 2022-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1063-1069 |
issn | 1279-8517 0930-1038 1279-8517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684098032 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Anatomy Coronaviruses COVID-19 Education Imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multiple choice Original Article Orthopedics Questionnaires Radiology Students Surgery |
title | Attainments during the COVID-19: a comparative survey study on ideal anatomy education from the students’ perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A56%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attainments%20during%20the%20COVID-19:%20a%20comparative%20survey%20study%20on%20ideal%20anatomy%20education%20from%20the%20students%E2%80%99%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20and%20radiologic%20anatomy%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=Ortadeveci,%20Abdullah&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1063&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1063-1069&rft.issn=1279-8517&rft.eissn=1279-8517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00276-022-02978-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2693174155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-7619d91bb9729b18b8ca1ab3b52e47ab8af618a03211124722f0960a38cf4e923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693174155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |